@Pratik Patel
Pratik, I haven’t personally used Vekser, but I spent some time looking into their model because $50/month for comprehensive property management certainly gets your attention.
I think the important thing is understanding that this appears to be a different model than traditional local property management. They describe themselves as a technology-enabled real estate services platform, using centralized systems and third-party/local service providers to deliver many of the functions a traditional PM handles.
There’s nothing inherently wrong with that. In fact, I think technology is going to continue automating a large portion of property management.
My concern would be the exceptions.
Collecting rent, processing routine maintenance requests, sending notices and coordinating vendors can all be systemized. The real value of an experienced property manager shows up when a $1,500 repair should actually be a $300 repair, a tenant stops paying, an application looks fraudulent, a property isn't leasing, a contractor gives a questionable diagnosis, or you have a situation requiring someone experienced to physically put eyes on the property.
Before signing up, I would ask Vekser very specifically:
- Who is the locally licensed broker/manager responsible for my property?
- Who physically visits the property when judgment is required?
- Are there maintenance markups or other vendor fees?
- Who selects and supervises contractors?
- How are evictions and difficult tenant situations handled?
- What exactly is included in tenant placement and turnover?
- What happens when something falls outside their normal process?
- Can they provide references from owners who have completed an entire lease cycle, including a move-out and security deposit disposition?
I would also read the actual agreement rather than making the decision based on the advertised monthly price.
For an investor comparing Vekser to self-management, I think the model is very interesting. If they can remove 80% of the workload for a reasonable price, there could be real value there.
Comparing it to a really good full-service local property manager is more complicated. You're not just comparing fees; you're comparing who has the experience, authority and local knowledge to make good decisions when things don't go according to plan.
In this business, the routine 90% is pretty easy to systemize. It's the other 10% that can get expensive.