When you buy land, how much do you care about “usable acreage” vs total acreage?
I’ve been thinking about this a lot while looking at different vacant land deals.
A listing might say 10 acres, 20 acres, 40 acres, etc., but that number doesn’t necessarily tell you how much of the property actually works for what you want to do with it.
Once you start layering in things like floodplain, wetlands, drainage, slope, setbacks, easements, access, septic limitations, or zoning requirements, the realistic usable area can look pretty different from the advertised acreage.
And none of those things automatically make a property a bad deal. Sometimes they barely matter depending on the intended use.
But it makes me wonder how other land investors think about it.
When you’re evaluating acreage, do you have a minimum percentage of the property that needs to be realistically usable before you walk away?
Or is it completely dependent on price and what you plan to do with the land?
Would love to hear how others approach it.