I’m a small landlord in the Boston area and considering offering a rental turnover coordination service for landlords who don’t need full property management.
Think coordinating cleaners/repairs, scheduling vendors, providing access, checking completed work, and keeping the landlord updated.
I’m testing the idea before moving forward. Would you pay for something like this? Would love feedback, especially on what you’d expect to pay. Feel free to DM me too.
Real Estate Agent · Kansas City · Member since 2018 · 4k+ posts · 3k+ votes
2w
Seems interesting. I would check if you need to be licensed, seems like you'd be doing PM work. I've seen PM handle evictions for a fee so similar thing ish
Real Estate Investor · Sacramento, CA · Member since 2010 · 292 posts · 103 votes
2w
all this concern about being licensed! when I look for someone for help I look for reliability, honesty and competency to do the work. I couldn' t care less about a license if they have the other things.
Ypsilanti, MI · Member since 2026 · 1 post · 0 votes
2w
Ideally, I would want this service combined with tenant-placement. The amount I want to spend on turning over that apartment is based on what kind of tenant I can place there after turning it around.
Investor · Pacific Northwest · Member since 2026 · 538 posts · 303 votes
2w
We’ve designed systems around almost this exact problem. The turnover gets treated like a controlled workflow:
tenant-out → property condition captured → scope created → vendors dispatched → access coordinated → work verified with photos/proof → exceptions handled → owner gets status updates → unit is handed back ready for the next tenant.
That matters because the landlord isn’t really paying you to schedule a cleaner. They’re paying you to make the turnover disappear from their workload while still giving them visibility and control.
I’d probably price it as a flat turnover-management fee, with vendor costs passed through separately, rather than hourly billing. Then you can create different service levels depending on whether it’s a simple clean/paint turnover or something involving multiple trades and repairs.
The licensing question Caleb raised is worth checking carefully in Massachusetts, because the exact line between coordination and regulated property-management/brokerage activity matters.
But as a service concept? Absolutely. I think there’s a real product there if you systematize it instead of becoming the landlord’s on-call assistant.
We’ve spent a lot of time designing this kind of operating infrastructure. If you want to compare notes on how I’d structure the workflow, feel free to reach out.
Real Estate Investor · Sacramento, CA · Member since 2010 · 292 posts · 103 votes
2w
I would definitely use such a service. I have actually had "vendors" back out and refuse to work for me because they are afraid of being ripped off by an out of town landlord not paying them for work, but it would be easier if I could say "my turnover coordinator" will meet with you personally, approve any work, then ensure you get paid.
Property Manager · Orange County, CA · Member since 2025 · 36 posts · 9 votes
1w
Owners are not really paying for someone to text a cleaner. They are paying for a controlled turn: keys in, condition captured, scope written, vendors sequenced, access handled, work verified with photos, then a ready-to-show handoff. Flat fee for coordination plus vendor costs passed through usually beats hourly chaos. In California I would also confirm where the service sits relative to licensed PM or brokerage rules before you market it. The product works when the landlord gets status without owning the chase.
Coral Springs, FL · Member since 2018 · 468 posts · 98 votes
1w
the vendor trust thing ed mentioned is huge. i buy tax deed properties in florida and half the battle is getting contractors to even show up when youre an out-of-town name they dont recognize. having someone local who can meet them at the property, verify the work, and make sure they get paid - thats worth paying for right there. flat fee makes way more sense than hourly. hourly just invites scope creep and arguments about what counts as a half hour. one thing id add - photos at every step. before, during, after. thats what keeps everyone honest and gives the landlord something to reference if theres a dispute later.