Feels like the pre-foreclosure and tax-delinquent lists everyone used to lean on are more picked-over than ever. Most of what I'm putting under contract lately comes through direct relationships — other agents, wholesalers, word of mouth — rather than any list or portal. Anyone else seeing the shift away from "traditional" lead sources toward relationship-driven deal flow?
Virtual Assistant · Egypt · Member since 2026 · 51 posts · 15 votes
2mo
This tracks with what I've seen too: once a list is popular enough that 50 other investors are calling the same names, it stops mattering how 'motivated' the data says someone is. What's worked better is combining fresher, less-picked-over sources (direct county pulls, code violations, less common data cross-references) with consistent outbound instead of relying on any single list. Relationship-driven deal flow is great once it's built, but it usually takes volume of conversations early on to get there; the relationships come from being the person who called first and followed up right, not just networking passively.
Realtor · Willow Grove, PA · Member since 2017 · 974 posts · 641 votes
2mo
Relationships are one of the most valuable parts of real estate. Some of the best opportunities I've seen over the years have come through the people I've met and the relationships I've built. It's one of the things I enjoy about our co-investing club too. Everyone brings different experiences to the conversation, and we all learn from one another.
Investor · Hatboro, PA · Member since 2016 · 2k+ posts · 853 votes
2mo
Good relationships tend to lead to opportunities that never make it to the broader market, and they often come with a lot more context about the deal. Over the years, I've found some of my best deals have come through people rather than lists.
Coral Springs, FL · Member since 2018 · 464 posts · 95 votes
4w
Jack, your observation is exactly right — but I think the answer isn't choosing between lists and relationships. It's a third channel most people overlook.
Lucas mentioned "direct county pulls" — that's the closest hint in this thread. But even pulling county data requires skip tracing, cold calling, mailing 15 postcards per lead, and hoping someone calls back. The relationship-building IS the work, and it's expensive work.
There's a channel where the county already did ALL the work for you: tax deed auctions.
The owner hasn't paid taxes for 1-3 years. The county sent the notices, ran the legal process, and scheduled the auction date. You don't need to skip trace, cold call, or build relationships. The properties go to auction on a specific date, the list is public, and you just show up.
The discount is the real edge. At tax deed auctions in Broward County, properties sell at 50-70% of assessed value. That's not a negotiation — that's the opening bid structure. No agents, no commissions, no concessions, no inspections, no appraisals, no lender requirements. Just cash and a bid.
Broward County Auction #113 is October 26. 16 properties, $200K-$500K assessed values, $100K-$350K opening bids. The spreads are $80K-$300K+ per property.
The competition angle matters too. Most wholesalers are mailing pre-foreclosure lists and hoping for callbacks. They don't understand tax deed auctions because it requires cash and you can't inspect inside. But that's exactly why there's less competition — the barrier to entry (cash + auction knowledge) filters out the tire-kickers.
So to answer your question: the shift away from traditional lead sources is real, but the answer isn't just relationships. It's finding channels where the distress is already verified, the process is transparent, and the discount is structural — not dependent on who you know.
Everyone's right that lists get picked over, but the mechanic most people miss: the list isn't the edge, the reading of it is. A tax-delinquent list is raw data. What turns it into a lead is the second pass - cross-referencing each parcel against the assessor: is the tax bill mailing address different from the property address, how many years delinquent, is there a recent code enforcement case, and does the vesting deed show the same owner as the tax bill. The investors still eating from these lists aren't buying bigger lists, they're buying smaller ones they've actually researched.
Second mechanic: stack signals. Tax delinquency alone is weak - plenty of people pay late and redeem. Tax delinquency plus a water shutoff plus a code violation on the same parcel is a different conversation. Most counties publish all three. Nobody stacks them because it takes an afternoon of spreadsheet work.
Third: the unsexy channel nobody talks about - municipal liens. A small water or sewer lien won't show up on anyone's motivated-seller list, but the owner who owes the city money they can't pay is often the same owner who'll take a low offer. Pull the municipal lien search, not just the tax list.
Lists don't get picked over. Lazy lists get picked over.