The Self-Rental Trap: Losses are Passive, Income is Nonpassive

The Self-Rental Trap: Losses are Passive, Income is Nonpassive

Dominick AustriaBusiness Member
Accountant · Las Vegas · Member since 2019 · 47 posts · 18 votes

Congratulations! Your operating business (medical, attorney, cpa, construction, etc) has been growing and you're looking at the next step. It's likely buying a commercial property to use as your office.

Under IRS rules if you rent your commercial real estate to your operating business it's classified as a self-rental. As a self-rental any losses are considered passive and any income is considered nonpassive. This is the self-rental trap. That cost segregation you did on the commercial real estate? Useless until you sell. Unless you have other passive income you will not be able to use the passive losses.

So then how businesses get the benefit of buying commercial real estate. It's through a grouping election. You tell the IRS that you are treating the commercial real estate and your operating business as one economic unit. Now your losses from the CRE can offset your operating business income. That's a win! However, there are certain limitations to grouping.

  • Rental is insubstantial in relation to the operating business; OR

  • Operating business is insubstantial to the rental; OR

  • Same proportionate ownership: each owner of the operating business has the same proportionate ownership in the rental activity

Notice only one of these requirements must be met. The last option is usually the easiest and most direct route.

One last important thing: you have to make this election in the first year you have both properties. There may be late election relief. It's important you work with professionals who know which elections to make and when. Tax preparation and planning is more than putting numbers in a software or spreadsheet..

Disclaimer: This post is for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended to provide tax, legal, or accounting advice. Tax consequences depend on your specific facts and circumstances. Consult with your own qualified tax and legal professionals before taking action.

Intent CPA Solutions, LLC523 Reviews
1Reply
61 views

3 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Henry ClarkPro Member
    Developer · Member since 2020 · 4k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    6h

    OP. Please put $100 on red for me. Your tag line says Las Vegas.

    Since Land can't be depreciated and the Building has a long depreciable life.

    Can they jack up the Rental rate for the building and reduce the "Practices" personal income? Reducing both their practice income and possibly their tax rate.

    On the building ownership side since this is passive, hopefully the Wife is a stay at home mom. Can they do a joint return to reduce the overall tax impact, plus on top of that do the Cost Seg on the Building entity side? Basically, taking a faster bite out of the Building and the Land cost.

    Let me know if I win and I will send the $100.

    Thanks.

    • Dominick AustriaBusiness Member
      OP
      Accountant · Las Vegas · Member since 2019 · 47 posts · 18 votes
      6h

      Come out to Vegas and we'll put $100 on red together.

      Just like all IRS rules the rent has to be fair market value. Lower than FMV, red flag. Jacking up the rental rates, red flag. Also, you're just transferring money from one pocket to the other. It doesn't really have any benefit to do anything other than FMV. If you're plan to sell the CRE or the business you'll want to make sure the rent is FMV to provide trustworthy financials to buyers. Fun fact, I see most clients paying below FMV rather than above FMV.

      Sure, the wife can be REPS but REPS doesn't make the rental automatically nonpassive. You/she still need to materially participate in the rental and likely still need to file a grouping election. Plus if you file a REPS election any prior year suspended losses are still.... suspended. If you have a change in facts in circumstances you can make a grouping election.

      Intent CPA Solutions, LLC523 Reviews
  • Divin KanyamaBusiness Member
    Accountant · Seattle, WA · Member since 2025 · 272 posts · 89 votes
    5h

    @Dominick Austria Great explanation of an issue that is easy to miss until after the property is purchased. Grouping can be a powerful strategy when the ownership, participation, and other requirements are met. I would only add that cost-segregation losses are not necessarily “useless” without it—they may be suspended and used later against passive income or upon a qualifying disposition. Either way, this is why the structure and elections should be reviewed before closing, not after the return is prepared.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.