Is Investing in Mobile Homes Without Land Still Worth It?
Hey BP Fam,
While our main focus is raising capital, our websites consistently generate leads from Mobile Home Sellers throughout GA/SC.
I’m curious to hear from investors who are actively buying and selling mobile homes without land.
At HAS Holdings, we consistently generate several organic mobile-home seller leads each month. Lead generation really isn’t the biggest challenge; it's the Dispo.
When a home doesn’t come with land, the buyer pool can narrow quickly. You may have a perfectly legitimate opportunity, but you still need the right buyer who understands mobile homes, can handle the title and logistics, and—if necessary—has somewhere to move the home.
It's got me questioning whether mobile homes without land are still worth pursuing as a standalone investment strategy, or whether the better move is to tighten the buy box and focus more on homes that come with land.
For those of you actively doing these deals:
Are you still buying mobile homes without land?
How are you building your dispo/buyer network?
Are you primarily selling to park owners, individual buyers, other investors, or movers/dealers?
Have you found certain price points, ages, sizes, or markets that make these considerably easier to move?
Or have you stopped pursuing mobile-home-only deals altogether?
We’re getting leads organically, so I’d hate to walk away from a working lead source. But a lead only has value if there’s a reliable exit strategy on the other side.
I'd appreciate hearing what’s working for people doing these deals today—especially anyone who's solved the disposition side of the equation.
What would you change: the acquisition criteria, the disposition strategy, or the business model altogether?
Thanks for reading!
Avrom