What Makes a Multifamily Deal Attractive to Investors? IRR, CF, or Something Else

Question

Hello everyone! I'm a North Jersey-based real estate investor and have been acquiring two-family properties over the past four years, achieving 20%+ IRRs. I've also completed value-add renovations and have been managing the properties myself. (buy & hold)

Lately, I've been seeing more price cuts and attractive opportunities in my market. Unfortunately, my own capital is limited, so I can't pursue all the deals I'm finding.

This has gotten me thinking about raising outside capital to pursue more residential multifamily investments and potentially larger deals.

I'm curious to hear from investors here: What makes a real estate deal attractive enough for you to invest in?

Are you primarily looking for a projected 13–15%+ IRR, or am I thinking about this too technically? How much weight do you place on factors like cash flow, equity multiples, downside protection, the operator's track record, or the overall investment strategy?

Would love to hear how you evaluate these opportunities, especially when investing alongside smaller, local operators.

Thank you!

Kasing Ng · Answer

Hi Beste, congrats on the 20%. That is great.

Quick context: I am a CPA, not an investor, so I am answering as the person LPs ask to sanity-check a deal. When I look at a syndication projection, the headline IRR is the last thing I weight. Your actuals earned trust; a pro-forma number hasn't yet. And a projection is only as good as its two soft spots, the exit cap and rent growth, which drive most of it. So I want to see the deal with the exit cap 50 bps higher and rents slower than planned. A sponsor who shows that downside earns more trust than one waving a clean 15%. After that it's alignment (your own money in the deal, how heavy the fees are, whether the waterfall pays LPs first) and basic cushion (break-even occupancy, DSCR).

One thing most first-time raisers miss: what an LP keeps is the after-tax number, not the IRR on the deck. That year-one depreciation that looks so good is usually suspended under Section 469 for a passive investor, so no current write-off unless they have got other passive income. Then exit brings recapture plus the 3.8% NIIT. Same pre-tax IRR, very different take-home depending on leverage, hold, and state. Hand a prospect an honest after-tax range and you'll stand out, because almost nobody does.

Happy to be a resource as you build the raise.

Joseph Scorese · Answer

Beste, great question. I've been in mortgage lending, private capital, and real estate for over 20 years, and one thing I've learned is that investors look at much more than projected IRR.

A 13–15% IRR sounds attractive, but personally, I'd put just as much weight on consistent cash flow, downside protection, realistic appreciation assumptions, and the operator's track record.

I've seen deals with impressive projected returns fall apart because renovation costs, carrying expenses, or exit valuations weren't realistic.

Your experience acquiring, renovating, and managing two-family properties with 20%+ IRRs is a strong starting point. Investors want to know you can execute, not just put together a good spreadsheet.

I'd also focus on how much capital is at risk, when investors get their money back, and what happens if the market doesn't perform as expected.

At the end of the day, investors aren't just investing in the property. They're investing in the person running the deal.

Joseph V. ScoreseNationwide Direct Private Lender | Built Lending

Aaron Zimmerman · Answer

I look for reasonable projections, track record, and exit cap rate. If you’re projecting same as purchase or lower cap rate, that’s a major red flag

Matthew Morrow · Answer

@Beste Park four years of buying and self-managing two-families is a solid base to build from. If I were looking at a deal like yours, a strong IRR would get my attention, but the downside is what I'd want to understand: what happens if rents stay flat, the refi takes longer than planned, or a big item hits in year one. A track record on smaller deals, honest numbers, and clear communication go a long way with people putting money in. Before you start those conversations, I'd talk with a securities attorney, since how you raise matters as much as what you raise for. Hope some of that helps.

Ametria Chaney · Answer

Congratulations on those actuals, Beste — 20%+ IRRs across your own two-families is exactly the track record future investors will care about most. From where I sit as both an agent and investor, the headline IRR gets the meeting, but cash flow and downside protection close the check. Investors want to know: does it cash flow from day one (or right after the reno), what's the equity cushion if values dip, and when do they get their capital back? Your four years of acquiring, renovating, and self-managing is the real story — lead with that, show conservative numbers, and be upfront about fees and splits. At the end of the day, people invest in the operator, not the spreadsheet.

Muyees Ayilara · Answer

Beste - congrats on 20%+ IRRs, that's solid for buy & hold in NJ.

From what I see with LPs looking at small multifamily deals in FL and NJ:

IRR 13-15% is fine on paper, but most passive investors I talk to care more about 3 things:

Cash flow day 1 - is it actually cash flowing after reno or is it all back-end? A 14% IRR with 0% cash flow for 3 years is tough sell vs 11% with 6% cash on cash from year 1.

Downside - how much equity buffer? If you buy at 75% of ARV vs 90%, that story matters more than IRR model.

Operator - your 4 years + managing yourself is the track record. Most LPs bet on operator, not spreadsheet. Show your last 2 deals, what you projected vs actual.

If you are raising for Jersey City area, I would lead with your 20% actuals, then show conservative underwriting on next one. IRR is technical, cash flow and capital preservation is what gets checks.

Are you looking to JV or syndication model for the next ones?

Michele Balady · Answer

I think projected IRR is important, but it shouldn't be the deciding factor on its own. A 15% projected IRR means very little without understanding the assumptions, holding period, financing structure, and risks behind it.

Personally, I'd pay close attention to the operator's track record, the property's fundamentals, cash flow potential, downside protection, and how realistic the exit strategy is.

I also think transparency matters enormously when outside capital is involved. Investors should understand how their capital is being deployed, how distributions are structured, what fees are involved, and what happens if the project doesn't perform as expected.

One thing I'm curious about: when bringing in outside investors, how do you approach balancing attractive returns with protecting investor capital, particularly in a changing market?

Ashish Acharya · Answer

Beste, I think the shift from using your own capital to bringing in outside investors is where the analysis gets much more interesting.

I'd look beyond the headline IRR and make sure the partnership structure clearly handles capital contributions, distributions, profit and loss allocations, depreciation, and each investor's economic interest.

The after tax return can also look very different from the advertised IRR depending on how depreciation and other tax items are allocated to the investors. Once you have multiple investors, keeping the books and capital accounts clean becomes just as important as finding the deal.

I'd get the CPA involved before raising the first dollar so the economics and tax reporting are designed together rather than trying to fix the structure after closing.

Feel free to DM me, I'd be happy to send over a few resources that might be helpful.

Gianna Fazzalari · Answer

Hi! I’m a licensed real estate agent in New York, however I think I can help.
While IRR (13–15%+) and cash flow are critical, when investing with smaller local operators, the operator's track record and downside protection weigh the most. Having someone with a proven local execution history (like your 4-year North Jersey track record) mitigates execution risk, which matters just as much as the projected numbers.

Ryan Brown · Answer

I’d look at the return relative to the risk, rather than starting with a specific IRR target. The more stable the asset and predictable the cash flow, the lower the return an investor will generally be willing to accept. A deal involving major renovations, lease-up, or more uncertainty needs to offer more upside to justify that risk. A longer timeline before investors receive distributions or get their capital back can also raise their return expectations.

For me, a projected 15% IRR doesn’t mean much without understanding what has to happen to achieve it. Is the return coming from actual operations, or does most of it depend on selling at the right price several years down the road? Those are very different propositions, even if the projected IRRs look identical.

One other important consideration: raising outside capital, especially from passive investors, can bring SEC and state securities requirements into play. Depending on how the offering is structured, there can be restrictions on how you market it, who can participate, and what disclosures and filings are required. Raising from friends and family doesn’t automatically exempt you from those rules, so I’d involve a securities attorney before soliciting investments.

Ultimately, I’d focus on showing investors why the projected return fairly compensates them for the risk, how you’re protecting their capital, and when they can reasonably expect to get it back—not just presenting the highest IRR.

What Makes a Multifamily Deal Attractive to Investors? IRR, CF, or Something Else

What Makes a Multifamily Deal Attractive to Investors? IRR, CF, or Something Else

Most Popular Reply

12 Replies