Property Owners: What's More Important—Rent Price or Tenant Retention?

Property Manager · Covington, KY · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 7 votes

I recently came across an interesting statistic: Renters who are satisfied with maintenance are 57% more likely to plan to renew their lease.

As a property manager, I believe keeping good tenants starts with being responsive and staying ahead of maintenance issues.

A vacant property can cost an investor far more than a timely repair!

Here's my question for fellow investors and landlords:

Would you rather increase rent by $100 and risk losing a great tenant, or keep rent the same for another year to encourage them to stay?

I'm curious how other investors approach this. Let's hear your thoughts!

1 Reply

3,385 views

Most Popular Reply

Rosina Persaud

Member since 2023 · 106 posts · 24 votes

Retention, and it is not close once you run the vacancy math. A good tenant already in place is a known payer. A vacancy is a known loss: the house earns nothing while you turn it, clean it, list it, screen again, and wait for the next move-in. Across our 236 doors in Memphis, turnover and vacancy cost more than repairs — and more than a modest increase is worth if it pushes a paying tenant out. Price the increase against the empty weeks, not against last year's rent. If a small increase risks a move-out, take the renewal and keep the rent coming. Protect the occupied day first.

1 Reply

See this reply in the discussion

23 Replies

Jump to latestLatest

Sort by

Rosina Persaud
Member since 2023 · 106 posts · 24 votes
1d
Retention, and it is not close once you run the vacancy math. A good tenant already in place is a known payer. A vacancy is a known loss: the house earns nothing while you turn it, clean it, list it, screen again, and wait for the next move-in. Across our 236 doors in Memphis, turnover and vacancy cost more than repairs — and more than a modest increase is worth if it pushes a paying tenant out. Price the increase against the empty weeks, not against last year's rent. If a small increase risks a move-out, take the renewal and keep the rent coming. Protect the occupied day first.
1 Reply
- Vicky McIntosh
  OP
  Property Manager · Covington, KY · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 7 votes
  1d
  @Rosina Persaud I completely agree! Keeping a good, paying tenant is often far more valuable than pushing for a small rent increase. Vacancy, turnover, and lost rental income add up quickly. I always encourage owners to look at the bigger picture. The goal isn't just maximizing rent today; it's protecting their investment and building long-term profitability.
  0 Reply
- Rosina Persaud
  Member since 2023 · 106 posts · 24 votes
  8h
  Appreciate that, Vicky — running the empty-weeks math usually settles the rent-versus-retention question fast.
  0 Reply
Ryan SpathBusiness Member
Real Estate Agent · Boise, ID · Member since 2017 · 598 posts · 382 votes
1d
Retention wins, however if you maintain a property well are attentive to the real needs of the home and truly treat this like a business I have personally found that good tenants recognize this and absorb small rental increases.
[email protected]208-600-2814
0 Reply
- Vicky McIntosh
  OP
  Property Manager · Covington, KY · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 7 votes
  1d
  I completely agree, @Ryan Spath! Retention is about more than keeping rent increases reasonable. When owners invest in maintaining their properties and tenants feel heard and valued, it creates a relationship where everyone benefits. I've found that communication and proactive maintenance make a tremendous difference. A well-maintained property and a reliable tenant are both worth protecting!
  1 Reply
Sajjad R.
Real Estate Consultant · WY · Member since 2023 · 20 posts · 6 votes
1d
Vicky, agree, a great tenant leaving usually costs more than a year of that $100. What works well is offering a smaller increase early, around 90 days out, with the renewal already drafted so they can sign that same week. A lot of the move-outs over small increases happen because the notice lands late and the tenant has already started looking. Do you start renewal talks at 60 or 90 days?
0 Reply
- Vicky McIntosh
  OP
  Property Manager · Covington, KY · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 7 votes
  10h
  @Sajjad R. We start the renewal process at 90 days. I believe being proactive and maintaining open communication with tenants makes a significant difference in retention. Giving tenants plenty of notice allows them to plan ahead and helps prevent unnecessary turnover. At the end of the day, keeping a great tenant is often far more valuable to an owner than a small rent increase.
  0 Reply
Jim Johnson
Real Estate Agent · Memphis · Member since 2026 · 614 posts · 356 votes
1d
I'd rather keep a reliable tenant for another year than risk losing them over $100. Between vacancy, cleaning, and getting the unit ready for someone new, that extra rent could easily get eaten up. Of course, it depends on the property's expenses, but keeping a good tenant is worth considering before raising the rent.
0 Reply
- Vicky McIntosh
  OP
  Property Manager · Covington, KY · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 7 votes
  10h
  @Jim Johnson I completely agree, Jim! Vacancy, turnover costs, and lost rental income can quickly outweigh a small increase. I always encourage owners to look at the bigger picture. A reliable tenant who pays on time and takes care of the property is an investment worth protecting. Tenant retention should always be part of a smart property management strategy!
  0 Reply
Harrison C.
Member since 2017 · 81 posts · 36 votes
1d
Vicky, one angle nobody has added yet, from renting by the room.
In a house rented by the room, people turn over more often, so the market catches up on its own. When a room comes open, list it at today's price. The residents already there keep their rate at renewal, or get a small bump.
Two reasons. $100 on a $650 room is about a 15% raise, and that lands very differently than $100 on an $1,800 house. And housemates talk. A new person paying more for the same size room is fine, that is the price that day. Raising the long-timer to match tells your best payer the house is worth leaving.
The math I'd run is per room: the days that room would sit empty times its daily rent, plus the clean and the listing time. If that costs more than a year of the increase, keep the rent where it is.
0 Reply
- Vicky McIntosh
  OP
  Property Manager · Covington, KY · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 7 votes
  10h
  Great perspective, @Harrison C.! I agree that renting by the room requires a different approach. Looking at the percentage of the increase rather than just the dollar amount is important. I also believe rewarding reliable, long-term tenants makes good business sense. Too often, owners focus on maximizing rent without considering the actual cost of turnover. Protecting cash flow sometimes means knowing when NOT to raise the rent!
  0 Reply
Lee Futcher
Technology · Vancouver, BC · Member since 2026 · 109 posts · 17 votes
10h
Hi Vicky,
That 57% number says a lot, and it matches what Rosina and Ryan described. Tenants don't decide to renew when the renewal letter arrives. They decide over the whole year, every time something breaks and they see how quickly it gets handled.
One thing that ties your two ideas together: when the renewal goes out, include a short note listing what was fixed or improved during their lease, with the dates. Most tenants have forgotten the furnace that got replaced in January by the time the letter shows up in October. Reminding them puts the increase right next to the care they've received, and a modest bump reads very differently when they can see where the money goes.
Thanks for starting such a practical discussion!
Lee
0 Reply
- Vicky McIntosh
  OP
  Property Manager · Covington, KY · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 7 votes
  10h
  @Lee Futcher, I couldn't agree more! Tenant retention begins long before the renewal letter arrives. Consistent communication, prompt maintenance, and showing tenants that their concerns matter make all the difference. I especially like your suggestion of including a summary of improvements with the renewal. That's a great way to reinforce the value tenants are receiving. Thanks for sharing such a thoughtful perspective!
  0 Reply
Leo SteinBusiness Member
Property Manager · Orange County, CA · Member since 2025 · 269 posts · 55 votes
7h
I would keep the rent flat on a great tenant more often than not. When I run the numbers on a turnover, I count the vacancy weeks, cleaning, paint, listing time, screening, and the risk that the next person pays late or damages the unit. For most single-family rentals that adds up to well over a month of rent, and a $100 monthly increase takes a full year to earn that back.
What I do instead is a modest, planned increase, often $25 to $50, delivered early with a note thanking them for taking care of the place. Tenants who are told early and feel respected usually renew. The ones who get a surprise big jump start looking.
I also check actual market rent every year so I know the gap before deciding. If the gap is big, I step toward market over two renewals rather than one.
Fast maintenance responses matter more than the dollar figure, as you said. Any notice timing or increase limits depend on your state and city, so check local rules. Not legal advice.
Happy to compare notes by message.
[email protected]949-391-1019
Real Property Management Optimal 521 Reviews
Website View Page
0 Reply
- Vicky McIntosh
  OP
  Property Manager · Covington, KY · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 7 votes
  6h
  @Leo Stein agreed! As a property manager, I believe retaining a great tenant is often more valuable than pushing for the highest possible rent increase. Vacancy, turnover expenses, and the uncertainty of finding a new tenant can quickly outweigh a modest increase. I always encourage owners to look at the bigger picture. Consistent communication, timely maintenance, and reasonable rent adjustments go a long way toward protecting their investment and keeping quality tenants long-term.
  0 Reply
Daniel Jung
Member since 2026 · 69 posts · 24 votes
6h
Retention, but only for a tenant who has earned it. If someone pays late, ignores the rules, or is hard on the home, I would rather price at market and start fresh. For a good tenant, my order is different. I talk to them before any renewal letter goes out, so the increase is part of a conversation and not a surprise in the mail. I keep increases small and on a steady pattern, so they can plan around them, and I pair them with something real, like a repair or upgrade they have been asking about. That makes the new rent feel tied to value, not just a higher number. Empty weeks, cleaning, listing, and screening a stranger add up fast. A fair rent from a known, careful tenant beats top rent from an unknown one most years.
0 Reply
- Vicky McIntosh
  OP
  Property Manager · Covington, KY · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 7 votes
  6h
  @Daniel Jung I agree! Keeping a good tenant is always the goal, but not at the expense of the property owner. I really like your approach of having that conversation before renewal. Communication makes such a difference! A tenant who pays on time, takes care of the property, and respects the lease is worth keeping. Sometimes a little less rent today means a much better return in the long run!
  0 Reply
Drew SygitBusiness Member
Property Manager · Royal Oak, MI · Member since 2012 · 13k+ posts · 9k+ votes
4h
You should put the increase in PERCENTAGE as $100 increase when the rent is $4000+ isn't much.
Obvious answer:
Vacancy is 1/12 or 8% loss of rent
RentReady often at least half a month of rent = 4%
Total is 12% of annual rental income
So, anything less than that to renew a lease is a positive!
[email protected]248-209-6824
Logical Property Management4.9462 Reviews
Website View Page
0 Reply
- Vicky McIntosh
  OP
  Property Manager · Covington, KY · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 7 votes
  2h
  @Drew Sygit I completely agree! Tenant retention is one of the biggest factors in protecting an owner's investment. A reasonable rent increase with a reliable, paying tenant can be far more profitable than pushing for top market rent and risking vacancy, turnover costs, and additional wear and tear. Sometimes the best return comes from keeping a great tenant in place!
  0 Reply
Muyees Ayilara
Lender · Boynton Beach, FL · Member since 2026 · 162 posts · 68 votes
2h
Vicky, retention wins for me every time, and I learned it the hard way in Florida.
That 57% number is real. I have seen it in my own rentals in Boynton and Delray. When I respond fast on maintenance, tenants stay. When I drag it out, they start looking, even if they like the house.
On your question, I will keep rent the same to keep a great tenant. Here is the math I use:
If I raise rent by $100, that is $1,200 a year extra. Sounds good.
If that tenant leaves because of the increase, I lose one month of vacancy at $2,100, plus $300 to $500 in turnover clean and paint, plus a week or two of showings. That is $2,400 to $2,600 lost to make $1,200. I am behind before the new tenant even moves in. And the new tenant might not be as good as the one I just lost.
What I do instead is keep rent flat for a great tenant who pays on time and takes care of the place, and I raise rent $25 to $50 on renewal for an average tenant. For a great tenant, I would rather do a small increase every two years than push $100 in one year and risk a vacancy.
A vacant property does cost far more than a timely repair. A $200 repair today that keeps a $2,100 tenant for another year is the best return I get in this business.
How are you handling it in Covington? Are you seeing tenants push back more on $100 increases this year than last year?
0 Reply
- Vicky McIntosh
  OP
  Property Manager · Covington, KY · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 7 votes
  2h
  I completely agree with your approach, ! @Muyees Ayilara ! Here in Northern Kentucky, I believe the key is evaluating each property and tenant individually rather than applying a blanket rent increase. Unless a property is significantly under market value, I would much rather recommend a reasonable increase than risk losing a great tenant over $100 a month.
  This year, we kept increases to just $50, and surprisingly, we received more pushback than normal, even at that amount. I think that says a lot about where tenants are financially right now.
  My priority is protecting the owner's investment while maintaining good tenant relationships. A tenant who pays on time, takes care of the property, and communicates well has tremendous value. Sometimes keeping a great tenant is far more profitable than pushing for higher rent!
  0 Reply
Lee Futcher
Technology · Vancouver, BC · Member since 2026 · 109 posts · 17 votes
2h
Hey Vicky,
Glad the renewal note idea was useful! It's a small habit, but it's the kind tenants remember when they're deciding whether to stay.
All the best,
Lee
1 Reply
Patrick O'SullivanBusiness Member
Property Manager · Phoenix, AZ · Member since 2024 · 555 posts · 210 votes
56m
The part I’d push back on a little is treating flat rent as the safe option. Taxes and insurance usually keep climbing, so a flat renewal is a real cut in what the property earns, and a few years of it can leave rent so far below market that the eventual increase is the thing that pushes a good tenant out. Small, regular increases are usually easier on everyone than a big catch-up later.
On the pushback you saw this year, I’d find out what’s behind it before deciding. Some tenants push back because they’re genuinely stretched, and some just want to see if there’s room to negotiate. Asking what would make the renewal work for them often tells you which one you’re dealing with, and sometimes the answer is a repair or a longer lease rather than a lower number.
[email protected]480-795-7938
get MULTIfamily Property Management4.7214 Reviews
Website View Page
0 Reply

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.