New to Real Estate · Member since 2026 · 19 posts · 0 votes
I'm curious about the real-world experience here.
Under one of the SEC's non-exclusive Rule 506(c) verification methods, a CPA can provide written confirmation of accredited investor status if the applicable requirements are met.
But in practice, do most sponsors accept CPA letters, or do some prefer their own verification process?
For those who've invested in 506(c) syndications:
Was a CPA letter accepted?
Did the sponsor require specific language?
Did an existing letter work, or was a new verification required?
It seems like confirming the sponsor's requirements upfront could save time and avoid unnecessary sharing of financial information.
I'd be interested in hearing how others have handled it.
Narasimha, I think the safest approach is to confirm the sponsor's requirements before having the CPA prepare the letter.
A CPA letter can be one of the verification methods used for a 506(c) offering, but I wouldn't assume that an existing generic letter will satisfy every sponsor. I'd ask the sponsor exactly what information they require, whether they have preferred language or a template, and how recently the verification needs to have been completed.
From the CPA side, I'd also want to make sure the verification is based on documentation that actually supports the accredited-investor criteria rather than simply signing a letter based on the investor's representation.
If you're evaluating multiple syndications, I'd keep the verification question separate from the tax due diligence on the investment itself. The K-1 structure, projected taxable income, depreciation, passive losses, tax distributions, and potential phantom income can be just as important once you're actually invested.
Have you already had a sponsor ask you for a CPA letter, or are you trying to understand the process before approaching sponsors?