For a 52-year-old building, I'd set aside another $200-300/mth for big-ticket items (HVAC, water heater, future roof replacement).

I have 80% co-insurance with replacement cost value.  

Its gets indexed by search engines very quickly and all those search engines keep complete copies of everything they indeWe care about our users and future viewiers, which is why our policies exist.

For the investor, that meant holding costs piling up fast.Here’s how we resolved it:Got on-site immediately to document status and secure the property.Started calling vetted backup contractors to step in for plumbing and electrical.Negotiated with the GC to either replace the missing subs or risk losing the contract.Within a week, new crews were in place, and we recovered most of the lost time in the schedule.It wasn’t pretty, but it kept the project moving and prevented a major blow to the investor’s budget and timeline. 

It transforms a powerful tax strategy into a fundamental part of the investment engine itself. 

Now to be fair the company we are funding is a Civil engineering firm with deep experience..

And yet, a few months in, costs creep up, timelines stretch, communication gets messy, and stress replaces confidence.

ARV Doesn’t Matter Until the Rehab Is RealisticToo many investors reverse-engineer their deal:ARV × 75 percent = “My max offer.”Then they plug in a rehab number that magically makes the deal look good.The problem?

I came to that conclusion for my own portfolio and had Cost-segregation guys do the engineered study.

I'd encourage you to check out ours :) There's also a link to my pricing engine at my website link below in my signature.