Any type of income-producing property placed into service after 1986 qualifies for cost segregation, making this tax strategy widely applicable across the real estate spectrum.
We frequently work with both residential properties, including single-family rentals, multi-family buildings, and short-term rentals like Airbnb properties, as well as commercial projects ranging from office buildings and retail centers to industrial facilities and medical offices.
The key requirement is that the property must be used for business or investment purposes rather than as a personal residence.
This includes properties you actively manage as rentals, those held for investment appreciation, and buildings used in your trade or business.
Properties acquired through various means including purchases, 1031 exchanges, inheritances, or new construction all qualify, as long as they meet the income-producing requirement and were placed in service after 1986.
Real Estate Investor · Austin, TX · Member since 2017 · 69 posts · 16 votes
8mo
Great answers above. One thing to add - timing matters too. If you're planning renovations or improvements, it's often worth waiting until after those are done to do the study, since you can include those costs and potentially get better results.
Also, while technically any property over $50k can qualify, most professionals recommend the property be at least $250k-$500k in value for the study costs to really make sense (usually $5k-$15k for the study). The bigger the property, the better the ROI on the study itself. For smaller property you can use DYI software tools.
You’ve got the core idea right. Cost segregation is pretty flexible as long as the property is income-producing and placed in service after 1986. That can be anything from single-family rentals, small or large multifamily, and STRs like Airbnbs, to commercial assets such as office, retail, industrial, or medical buildings. How you acquired it doesn’t really matter either—purchase, new build, 1031, even inherited property can qualify. The real line in the sand is use: it has to be for business or investment, not a personal residence. Where people get tripped up is eligibility vs. usefulness just because a property qualifies doesn’t always mean the numbers justify a study, especially on smaller deals. I’ve found automated tools very helpful for sanity-checking material participation and audit risk before going too aggressive, especially when layering cost seg on top.
Real Estate Investor · Austin, TX · Member since 2017 · 69 posts · 16 votes
8mo
Great answers above. One thing to add - timing matters too. If you're planning renovations or improvements, it's often worth waiting until after those are done to do the study, since you can include those costs and potentially get better results.
Also, while technically any property over $50k can qualify, most professionals recommend the property be at least $250k-$500k in value for the study costs to really make sense (usually $5k-$15k for the study). The bigger the property, the better the ROI on the study itself. For smaller property you can use DYI software tools.
Rental Property Investor · Philadelphia, PA · Member since 2021 · 774 posts · 500 votes
8mo
@Sagiv O. - I've heard even slightly higher values ($500k) to make the costs worthwhile. What other software programs have you used for a similar analysis?
@Sagiv O. - I've heard even slightly higher values ($500k) to make the costs worthwhile. What other software programs have you used for a similar analysis?
Room42.io is an option for DYI cost segregation study.
Investor , CPA · Detroit, MI · Member since 2016 · 582 posts · 248 votes
8mo
Hi Melanie, Owner of Maven Cost Seg here.
This is directionally correct, but the part that is usually overlooked is practical eligibility, not technical eligibility.
Yes, any income-producing property placed in service after 1986 can qualify. In reality, though, not every property is worth doing a study on. Size, purchase price, renovation history, and your tax situation matter just as much as the asset type.
Where we tend to see the strongest results are properties with a decent basis and some complexity, such as multifamily, self-storage, medical, light industrial, and even short-term rentals if they’re large enough. Single-family can work too; it just depends on the numbers.
The easiest way to think about it isn’t “does this qualify,” but “does accelerating depreciation actually move the needle for me now?” That’s where a quick estimate upfront saves a lot of time.
Accountant · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2016 · 2k+ posts · 899 votes
8mo
Great post — this is exactly the kind of clarity people need around cost segregation.
It’s really important to educate folks that not all properties are eligible. For example, non-rental primary residences do not qualify for cost segregation, since the property must be held for business or investment purposes. I literally had to explain this to someone just the other day who assumed any home could qualify.
Posts like this help set the right expectations and prevent a lot of confusion (and bad advice) out there.