My wife, son and I then moved, after 2 years of LPs, to be General Partners in large MF syndication mastermind so now we are in 13 deals, 3,500+ units, as co-GPs focused on Key Principal, At Risk Capital (EMD) and Capital Raising roles.   

So for a fund or multiple funds that Blackstone has set up and raised LP $'s for over the past couple years to acquire large swaths of single family homes, those investors (LPs) cannot just call capital and force Blackstone to sell.

@Sean O'DowdThis is soecific to Delaware LPs but they tend to be the most common:(a) Each limited partner has the right, subject to such reasonable standards (including standards governing what information and documents are to be furnished, at what time and location and at whose expense) as may be set forth in the partnership agreement or otherwise established by the general partners, to obtain from the general partners from time to time upon reasonable demand for any purpose reasonably related to the limited partner's interest as a limited partner:(3) A current list of the name and last known business, residence or mailing address of each partner;https://corporate.findlaw.com/corporate-governance/the-rights-of-limited-partners-and-members-to-obtain-information.html

They’re praying for 3x fed rate cuts this year, to stimulate refi’s and new buyers.

With 90% LTC initial debt it’s likely the LPs have about 20-25% of the capital stack.

This could be valuable to LPs.

That being said, there is no rule that says you have to put in a share, it's just more difficult to raise money from LPs with both no track record and no skin in the game.juan

Of course your plan will be different but this might stimulate something.

They don’t really want votes, they wrote this e-mail to show how “good” they are and to be able to shift blame to the LPs.

You need to understand your intention with time, and find something that stimulates enough that you can control with money.