Theyre under the microscope right now.At the end of the day, I don't what else to tell you other than you are wrong here.

My gut tells me that this would cause anybody reviewing this transaction to bring out the microscope, especially since you pulled yourself off title only a month ago as well as being owner of one of the properties involved in the exchange.

Unfortunately the things that Lonnie did back in his day were great money makers but have been all but made obsolete in this under the microscope predatory lending world that we live in.

Finally, make sure your rehab numbers are spot-on.if you're going to gut the place, that means you're opening up the walls and the city inspectors will be scrutinizing you with their Infamous microscope.

If 32% of all purchases are bought for cash (assuming no HML is involved), then we either have a huge influx of foreign  cash, or the inventory is so microscopically tiny that 1% or less of Americans buy almost third of existing inventory.

Your unit size is microscopic, telling yourself "many are just like this" is only making excuses for yourself, small is small, and that's tiny. 

I have tried for years to figure a way to use the Think or Swim charts and they are just too complicated and the fonts are microscopic because they need to show so many things on the same chart that I can't read the print.

The other practical aspect of this discussion that needs to be observed is that if you have a complicated asset protection set up, once there is a significant claim in which you desire the setup to protect you, their is a good chance it will be put under a microscope once litigation commences. 

No property manager will really screen tenants, put them under a microscope, not for the piddle they're being paid on a $50K property.

If you were to put their dna in an electron microscope you’d see tiny garbage bags of trash everywhere in their proteins and enzymes of the helix ..It’s part of who they are .