Siding that is deteriorating or rotted will allow moisture that can cause more damage.

This is a very common issue on small multis, especially older duplexes where everything is master-metered.In practice, I see three approaches that actually work, and one that usually causes friction.1.

These exercises may include staff, vendors, and—when appropriate—residents.For example, when simulating a severe storm that causes property damage and power loss, consider:Extent of damage: What areas are unsafe?

Undue Financial or Administrative BurdenIf the cost of accommodating the ESA is excessively high or logistically impossible.Example: Modifying an entire building for one tenant’s ESA.Direct Threat to Health or SafetyIf the animal poses a real, proven danger to other tenants or staff.Example: A dog with a documented history of biting people.Significant Property DamageIf the ESA causes repeated and severe property destruction.Example: An ESA that has destroyed walls or flooring in multiple incidents.Invalid DocumentationIf the ESA letter is fraudulent, outdated, or not issued by a licensed healthcare professional.Exempt Housing SituationsCertain housing types are not covered by the FHA, such as:Owner-occupied buildings with four or fewer units.Single-family homes rented without a broker.

@John Underwood, Yes, I have explored the tax implications that later, , residential use would cause. 

If someone plugs in a faulty appliance they'll potentially get electrictuted or cause a fire.

A serious mistake on your petition might cause your bankruptcy to be dismissed, but if the mistake was not in bad faith, you may be able to refile and would be unlikely to face criminal charges."

in NYC some owners are known to rent out their semi basement which is on a grey side. so during inspection would that cause any issue?

Thanks for sharing, saw some of the webinar from the wallstreetoasis link.Curious how they communciated this to the original investors, cause them seemed to infur on the webinar that the 18% is such a great deal and better then what we would have offered the original investors.

It is not seller financing by definition because the seller is not financing anything, their lender stays in place while the deed transfers to the buyer, possibly violating the terms of the loan and potentially triggering the due on sale clause, or causing insurance issues, potential problems with heirs, etc.