I feel like this is more and more common today with people that are just getting into real estate investing, buying at top dollar, and in general underestimate the construction costs in the scope of work. 

But to Chris's point, one of the common tactics right now is to sell a property for more than it's worth by using seller financing.

There are three common approaches, but the best strategy blends them:What typically works best:- Small predictable annual increases (2–5%) Tenants expect it, it prevents large jumps, and it keeps rent closer to market over time.- Market realignment at turnovers When a tenant moves out, reset to true market value.- Context matters - If tenant is excellent then prioritize retention with reasonable increases

ADU's are not as common in Indianapolis, We work with several contractors that have some experience with this and would love to connect with you to discuss this.

Homes are taking longer to sell compared with last year, and price reductions remain common when listings start above market expectations.

There isn't any info about the margin of error with the survey or any real info about the data collection. 

I recommend you get an estimate of cost and savings if you or spouse qualify as a REP or Dan use STR loophole (terrible name, but common name).  

It is not fair that they wont remove my post after SDIRA has done all they could to make up for the errors in a property manager that they do not even use anymore.

You’re asking the right questions, and this is a very common fork in the road I see as both a CA Realtor and investor.A few thoughts from someone who has been on both sides of this decision:The low rate you have is an asset, not just the house.Selling a 2020 rate is emotionally and financially hard for a reason.

There's so much culture and variation between the neighborhoods that each is like its own area. 2 families are common, and the occasional 3-4 unit as well.