When a Flip Goes Bad, Is Holding It as a Rental Actually Smart?

Question

I’m seeing this a lot lately and wanted to get some real-world opinions.

When a flip doesn’t go as planned, longer DOM, thinner margins, higher holding costs, a lot of investors decide to keep the property as a rental instead of selling at a loss. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it feels like the only option.

But I keep wondering where the line is between being flexible and just not wanting to take the loss.

I’ve seen deals where the rental only works if everything goes perfectly. Full occupancy, no big repairs, rent projections that feel a little optimistic. In those cases, the deal didn’t really improve, the strategy just changed because selling would hurt.

At the same time, I know investors who always underwrite flips with a rental exit from day one. For them, holding isn’t emotional, it’s just part of the plan if the market shifts. So I’m curious how others here think about it.

When a flip starts going sideways, do you usually hold and ride it out, or do you cut losses and move on?
What makes you decide one way or the other?
And looking back, were you happy with that decision?

Would love to hear how others are handling this in today’s market.

Peter Mckernan · Answer

This all depends on the situation... If you want to hold out to the full offer, or profit to make you whole that is one thing. Typically there is a breaking point as people have posted on here. There will come a time on the holding costs and leverage that it does not make sense to hold on anymore and start to drop the price more, take the loss and move on. This is something we are seeing more and more today. It is true because more areas have higher days on market and selling timeframes/pricing is not working out for the first numbers.

You need to take it case-by-case. One example.. I did a partnership last year, and we did a deal with higher holding costs along with pricing the home at a price we felt good with, and after a couple months we had to aggressively price the home lower due to the holding costs and get to a point where we broke even. This is typical for many deals across the board.

Lipa F. · Answer

If the property will cash flow and you have Capital to move on to the next deal there is no reason to sell it

Chris Seveney · Answer

The answer like most answers is, it depends. As as there is mentioned, some underwrite these deals as a flip or holding long-term. If the numbers work and it can cash flow as a rental, then it can be a lot more lucrative to build wealth as overtime real estate has appreciated. You typically should also avoid any major cost expenditures since you just renovated the property.
some people are financially stable to hold the asset and others or not. I believe that is important to take into consideration,

Ashish Acharya · Answer

@Doug Clark

This is such a good question, and from a tax perspective, it really depends on your overall situation. Sometimes taking the loss makes sense, especially if you have other income or businesses it can offset. Other times, holding it as a rental makes sense.

I like what Chase mentioned about how much it depends on your "experience, bandwidth, and resources." If it’s in a strong area you believe in and managing the property won’t stretch you thin, holding it makes a lot of sense. Of course, it might not have been your original plan, but there are plenty of situations today, our clients included, where renting it actually worked out just as well for them.

You’ll also want to think about the tax side. Flips are taxed as ordinary income, but holding the property as a rental and selling later can qualify for long-term capital gains and give you depreciation benefits, which can make a big difference. I saw someone above mention considering an STR - turning it into a short-term rental can make sense if you’re looking to offset higher W-2 income, and even if it is an LTR adding it to your portfolio can help work toward REP status since management time counts toward material participation hours. I also agree with Sean on cost segregation. If the rental does work out, you could consider getting a cost seg, accelerate depreciation, and create early losses to offset other income. Like I said at the beginning and others mentioned in the thread, it really depends on your goals and overall picture.

I am glad someone brought these questions up because it is a good reminder as we head into this year to think through your exits before you buy and see how each outcome fits with your overall financial and tax picture. Good luck and happy to connect.

Sean Graham · Answer

Hi Doug, if holding as a rental becomes a viable option, remember to consider a cost segregation study immediately. Converting from a flip to a rental property makes it eligible for accelerated depreciation. A study can identify and reclassify components, often accounting for 20-30% of the property's basis, into shorter depreciation schedules (5, 7, or 15 years), and often includes 100% bonus depreciation. This generates substantial upfront tax deductions, significantly improving cash flow, and can help offset the unexpected hold.
Hope that helps!

Lipa F. · Answer

The thing is that usually in high class neighborhoods is it harder to cash flow but it's safer for flipping because people valued more renovated houses than outdated and also the prices are enough High to stay with profit and on the other hand the class C neighborhoods if it's go wrong you can keep it as a rental and sometimes even cash out refinance because even the market shift appraisal still looks on the old comps

Dan H. · Answer

I do my underwriting in the opposite direction. Plan A is a brrrr. If the rental market falls, Plan b is to flip. Fortunately I have never had to exercise plan b. However, I think it is safe to have alternate exit plans to reduce risk. Underwriting multiple scenarios with multiple exits is being thorough and reducing risk.

I believe my statements are true even if plan A is to flip and plan B is to rent. It is never bad to have multiple exits.

Good luck

I believe my statements are true even if plan A is to flip and plan B is to rent. It is never bad to have multiple exits.

Good luck

Lipa F. · Answer

Single family has low vacancy and it's just remodeled so low maintenance

Frank Pyle · Answer

Hold it only if it underwrites as a rental on today’s real numbers, not because selling hurts.

Quick check is rent minus PITI minus property management minus maintenance and capex, and you still want a cushion plus reserves for vacancy and repairs. If the rental only works with perfect occupancy and top end rent guesses, you are just delaying the loss and taking on more risk.

The actionable move is rerun the deal like a clean rental today using conservative rent, 8 to 10 percent vacancy, and real insurance and taxes, then compare that to the loss you take by selling now.

What are the actual monthly PITI and the realistic rent you are seeing today, and how much cash would you have left after closing if you sold it now?

When a Flip Goes Bad, Is Holding It as a Rental Actually Smart?

When a Flip Goes Bad, Is Holding It as a Rental Actually Smart?

Most Popular Reply

15 Replies