No asbestos, and my realtor has had talks with the city about diagonal parking in front of and on the side since it is a corner lot.

It's diagonal from Dairy Queen. 

Does anyone have any suggestions on where I can find contracts for my wholesale deal to give to both parities (seller and buyer)?

It has merely been the one that has reached cultural parity.

Rightfully so as the fence was installed diagonally to the street and encroached onto their property. 

Now IF we had all the people in the world going to trade schools which are currently at about 5-10% enrollment of pre-collapse numbers, and IF we had every developer dripping in billions to start all the developments needed to get to parity now, IF we had magic wands to waive to make the ridiculous mountains of red tape disappear so it didnt's take ridiculous months on months to get permits to break ground, you'd still have to answer for the fact that we can't get lumber, decking, fasteners or really just name the material because there is the biggest materials shortage in recorded history, only WWII compares in material shortages and there is 0 relief on the horizon because there is still various covid shut downs and restrictions.

These are old, almost always brick-veneer properties that have a lot of life left in them but have lacked the kind of maintenance they need, especially in recent years.The subflooring in these houses is typically diagonal 1-inch pine plank and they were originally finished with 3/4-inch tongue-in-groove oak strip from end to  end, bedrooms and bathrooms and kitchens alike.

@Vlad Bird It appears to me that you have high-tension power lines running diagonally across the property.

The adjusted outside basis of each partnership interest would generally be stepped up to FMV.In this situation it's usually a good idea if the partnership makes a Sec. 754 election (if it doesn't already have one in place) and a Sec. 743(b) adjustment to bring the decedent's share of inside basis back into parity with the newly stepped up outside basis.This is rather advanced partnership tax law and something you'll want to discuss with your tax professional.

The purpose of the 1984 amendment to section 195 was to bring sections 212 and 162 into parity when determining whether an expenditure has been incurred in a startup activity."