If a lender wants to enforce a Due On Sale, a Land Trust violates the DOS anyway so it is ineffective in stopping the Due On Sale call.Line 35 is always negotiable, but the seller needs enough to rent an apartment and move their belongs or they will become squatters which causes serious problems.

If a lender wants to enforce a Due On Sale, a Land Trust violates the DOS anyway so it is ineffective in stopping the Due On Sale call.Line 35 is always negotiable, but the seller needs enough to rent an apartment and move their belongs or they will become squatters which causes serious problems.

I agree with John especially as you've done work around the property-could any of that have changed the drainage or caused the problem? 

Maybe the government shut down is causing the slow down.  

The ARV will come into play and can cause a cap, but I am happy to run your scenario. 

Yes, in the event they cause damage or have monies owing after move out, you'll have an address to serve them. 

Assuming that's the case you have a real estate problem that's causing your investor problem.

Eviction isn't a great option here- I think you'd have major problems in court proving which tenant caused this issue or if it were tenant caused at all.

This is the foundation I recommend every investor start with—not just preparing for the lawsuit, but preventing the event that causes it.

Then we have more Bid's/Offers and some people over bidding to win which then also causes a trend on appraisal value increasing.If you ever have ny questions feel free to check out my profile and reach out via message or email.