These expensive mentorship programs are like gym. 

If the federal government pulls the plug on Section 8 funding completely, then missing rent will not be the biggest problem — think chaos in the streets! 

I suggest you look up some people’s journey using the NACA program on YouTube to see others realistic experiences.

I’m interested in hearing directly from investors who have participated in turnkey programs and are far enough along to reflect on actual performance.Specifically, I’d like to hear from investors where all of the following apply:Property owned for 3+ yearsProperty has gone through at least one tenant turnoverOwner is out of stateDay-to-day operations handled entirely by third-party property management and vendorsUnder those circumstances, how has the investment performed relative to your original expectations:UnderperformingMeeting expectationsOverperformingIf you’re willing to share, it would also be helpful to hear:How closely actual maintenance and capital expenses tracked underwritingAny lessons learned that weren’t obvious at the time of purchaseThanks in advance.

The risk is far lower, with a better ROI.OR you can consider learning about government contracts and performing lease matching. 

Recent leadership confirmations at Ginnie Mae and FHA signal stability in government-backed lending programs, which remain vital for first-time homebuyers.

I also would not get involved with any Mentor or program that charges money....at least any amount over $500 or so.

Lots of government funded applicants.  

It sounds like Cityfheps is a New York program.

Has anyone try this program?