I'm assuming they're cash flowing at the terms of their original deal, but haven't bothered to increase rents so it's a worthwhile deal in the current market.Maybe we're running the numbers wrong...does this resonate with what you're seeing? 

I'd be careful - this kind of thing can put you at risk if you are wrong.A more effective way to do this that might contribute value to the world in some way would be to put together a reasonable, rational, and professional post, asking for feedback, and inviting the person you are accusing or highlighting of wrongdoing to respond. 

Don’t Mess This Part UpQuick STR question I see trip people up all the time:Your rental averages 7 days or lessYou materially participatedSo yes — you likely qualify for the short-term rental “loophole.”Great.But then comes the part many investors get wrong Do you report the income on Schedule C or Schedule E?

If they were denied, send them an Adverse Action Notice, and keep all the information you collected about that applicant should the need arise to prove no wrongdoing on your part.

There’s definitely still wrongdoing here, just hoping something very serious in terms of legal charges will stick.

They place high-risk individuals in your home and then abandon you when things go wrong.

They place high-risk individuals in your home and then abandon you when things go wrong.

LPs who performed poor or no diligence at all and often cannot clearly articulate the business plan they invested in show up to point fingers, threaten SEC complaints, and talk lawsuits without being able to identify wrongdoing or fraud beyond the obvious.

They place high-risk individuals in your home and then abandon you when things go wrong.

But wouldn't we talk to the SEC about potential wrong doing (this could be low cost) and or do a group tort thus sharing legal fees?