
20 May 2025 | 7 replies
., minor scuffs), while damages result from negligence or misuse.

26 May 2025 | 19 replies
We formally appealed to Airbnb, making the case that:The guest used the threat of a bad review to demand a larger refund — a misuse of the review system.The 30% refund was Airbnb’s suggestion after their own investigation, not an admission of fault on our part.Outcome: Airbnb agreed and removed the review.Final ThoughtsThis situation made me reflect on how important it is for both hosts and platforms to maintain fair boundaries.

2 May 2025 | 7 replies
Since the tenant is new and was unable to access the mailbox due to a broken key in the lock, it initially appeared to be a maintenance issue—possibly due to wear and tear or misuse.

3 May 2025 | 3 replies
Jason’s response was to simply suggest that we proceed without it on the deed and "pay the taxes [that would be assessed for misuse of funds] with the profit from the property" Given the significant financial implications of this decision, this suggestion felt both unprofessional and dismissive of the serious concerns at hand.At this juncture, I made the decision to terminate the process on April 9, 2025.

17 May 2025 | 29 replies
And if you misuse the ingredients you may come up with a dinner disaster.

30 April 2025 | 36 replies
But let's not confuse misuse with the tool itself being "very bad advice."

9 April 2025 | 7 replies
I am working with my PM comany to investigate water leakages or tenant misuse but beyond that any suggestions on how to handle this situation?

23 March 2025 | 20 replies
Misusing that term when you are operating as a transaction broker can get you in trouble.

15 April 2025 | 376 replies
His charity the Trump Foundation was fined $2M and was shut down by a court order for its misconduct, and for misusing charitable funds for Trumps own personal gain.

13 March 2025 | 145 replies
Biased "evidence" is gathered to support the special interest groups position which is totally centered on self interest but disguised as "protecting" consumers. 2- real estate investors who have seen or experienced, first, second or third hand these transactions "blow up" and believe (incorrectly) that anything that can be misused should banned completely. 3- real estate investors so turned off by gurus lying to wanna be investors, teaching dangerous methods, and then "unleashing" they're "students" on unsophisticated homeowners that they can't even acknowledge that a subject to transactions can be beneficial to both sides of the transaction.