Real Estate Investor · Huntington Beach, CA · Member since 2008 · 221 posts · 9 votes
We recently had a seller request we wire the deposit funds into escrow before they signed the purchase agreements. We backed out on this request. The escrow agent said that this was common practice but we have never heard of it. Is this true, that such a thing is now commonly done?
You should have responded, "Okay, but I'll need the sellers to turn over the keys to the property a week before closing," and see if they thought that was reasonable... :D
Sometimes asset managers selling REOs will require EM at the time of verbal agreement, but for a private sale, I see no reason to provide EM before the contract is signed. How do you know the seller will even sign the contract and what instructions are you including with the escrow money if there is no contract?
You should have responded, "Okay, but I'll need the sellers to turn over the keys to the property a week before closing," and see if they thought that was reasonable... :D
Sometimes asset managers selling REOs will require EM at the time of verbal agreement, but for a private sale, I see no reason to provide EM before the contract is signed. How do you know the seller will even sign the contract and what instructions are you including with the escrow money if there is no contract?
We've never been asked to do this. I would immediately think this was a scam if someone requested it. There are thieves out there who set up fake escrow companies and "sell" houses they don't own. I'm not saying that's what was happening in this case, but I think you were wise to be suspicious.
The escrow company is real, but according to reviews they have a split personality. Some people think they are great, some people think they are slime.
We are thinking about withdrawing from the offer. If the sellers are going to behave like this all the time....
Why don't you just choose another escrow company? According to Federal law (RESPA, specifically), the seller can't bind you to a specific title company or closing attorney...
Well it's normal in California for the seller to choose the escrow company. Not sure what you mean by "the seller specifically demanded". This is sounding more and more like a scam to me.
I don't think it's even legal for an escrow company (in California) to accept payment if the agreement hasn't been signed by both parties and delivered to them. For the last purchase we made, I drove to the escrow company to deliver the deposit check and they said they legally could not accept the check because they hadn't received the paperwork from the seller yet.
We have had to wire the EMD prior to contract signing by the bank. We did not like it, but dealing with an REO is largely doing stuff that you do not like.
For traditional sales, we would not be willing to do this.
Hi, this is common and customary here. An earnest money deposit goes with the contract offer and is initially held by the selling agent's broker in escrow until the seller signs, then it goes to the settlement agent (title company) escrow acount.
This is not the down payment required for the ltv amount for loan purposes, like 10%. It is a smaller amount that may be requested by the seller or listing agent and suggested by the selling agent. The specific amount is never suggested by the selling agent but they will give an example, saying something like; "usually people provide between a thousand and fifteen hundred" or more on large priced homes over 200K. The amount is only to cover initial expenses, mainly title search and perhaps inspections that the seller must provide, in the event the buyer fails, the seller is not out any money. And yes, here, the seller provides proof of good title, which means the title search,buyer pays for the title policy.
I suggest you check around at other real estate companies or call title companies and see what is customary in that area.
Good luck!
Hi, this is common and customary here. An earnest money deposit goes with the contract offer and is initially held by the selling agent's broker in escrow until the seller signs, then it goes to the settlement agent (title company) escrow acount.
This seems weird, especially in a market where there are a lot of buyers bidding on a lot of properties. This would mean -- essentially -- that if a seller were to receive 5 offers on a property, the 5 buyers would allow have to provide earnest money to the listing agent, and that listing agent would have to give all 5 earnest money deposits to the listing broker. The listing broker would need to hold 5 EM deposits despite a maximum of one actually being held, and a minimum of 4 having to be returned to the buyers.
Seems like a LOT of overhead for a listing broker...especially in a hot market where most properties are getting multiple offers...
I don't see why it couldn't wait until the contract is signed, since the title company isn't going to be doing any work on behalf of the seller before that point, so there is no risk to the escrow company or title company.
Why don't you just choose another escrow company? According to Federal law (RESPA, specifically), the seller can't bind you to a specific title company or closing attorney...
This is exactly how we handle this and it has happened more and more often as even private sellers are getting hit by investors who back out of contracts. We simply put the EM or deposit with our closing attorney who provides proof to their escrow agent. If they don't like that - then we walk, but most private sellers are reasonable at that point and realize you are serious about the offer but want to protect your interests as well.
I would take this option before backing out if you really want the property.
There is no rule that says the buyer and the seller can't be represented by different companies, and that the buyer can't procure his own title search/insurance from his company while the seller is represented by his own attorney...
The sale is contingent upon us using their escrow company.
I have been cooperating with their demands up till now, trying to show we are serious buyers. But I am losing patience, especially since the demand for wiring the cash deposit to their escrow. I agree, I can't see several competing bids wiring cash to the same escrow company with no signed contract. Maybe they want to make interest holding that cash, while the seller delays his decision?
My partner, however, doesn't want to back out yet. So we will wait and see.
The sale is contingent upon us using their escrow company.
What exactly does that mean?
Do they demand you get your title search/insurance through their company? Do they demand you hold the EM in their escrow company? Do they demand that their attorney close the deal? All of the above?
In general, if the other party is making demands that you're not comfortable with (or you feel is putting you at risk), you should either demand changes or walk.
In this specific case, there is no reason why a seller should require you to use their escrow company (at least not without more explanation of why); without additional explanation or compromise, I'd be concerned about something something going on that you're not informed about.
Mark, 4 posts and we still don't know if this is an REO or a private seller. And what state is this property in? That may help shine some light on which laws are applicable and whether or not you're using a closing attorney or title company.