Wholesaling question?

Wholesaling question?

Real Estate Investor · Matthews, NC · Member since 2009 · 28 posts · 1 vote

I need help with this deal.
ARV 219,000
(.65*219,000)-10,000[repairs]-21,900[holding]-10,000[wholesale fee] = $100,450 MAO

Now the seller currently owes $157,000 on the property. Would it be an insult for me to offer the seller $100,450 knowing that they owe more than my offer. Should I at least offer what the seller owes on it, or should I not even worry about what the seller owes and just make offers based upon my numbers? I wanted to get an opinion from an experienced wholesaler on how you generally make offers. Any help will be appreciated.

0Reply
51 views

11 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • MA · Member since 2008 · 199 posts · 1 vote
    17y

    Why would you consider offering 157K if your MAO is 100K. Offer what you are willing to pay. Keep in mind I am NOT an experienced wholesaler, I just don't think you should EVER offer more than you are willing to pay.

    Good luck,
    Heather

  • Altus, OK · Member since 2008 · 2k+ posts · 690 votes
    17y

    No homeowner is going to sell you a home less on what they owe. Plus that would leave no equity and put the home upside down.

  • Rental Property Investor · Mercer Island, WA · Member since 2008 · 22k+ posts · 14k+ votes
    17y

    I think you're miscalculating your MAO. You wouldn't normally include the holding costs. If your buyer's criter is 65% of ARV, then:

    65% of $219K = $142.
    Less repairs of $10K is $132K
    Less your fee of $10K is $122K.

    Still below what the owner owes, so you would have to do a short sale to make this work.

  • Real Estate Investor · Myrtle creek , OR · Member since 2008 · 343 posts · 13 votes
    17y

    Paul, Generally the only time an owner might take less than what is owed would be a short sale situation. I'm also curious why you are figuring such a large amount for holding costs. You should have a buyers list ready before you put a property under contract, and you quickly assign the contract to one of them. There should be no holding costs to you. Jim

  • Will BarnardPro Member
    Moderator
    Developer · Santa Clarita, CA · Member since 2008 · 15k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    17y

    I think Jon hit the numbers more accurately so I would use that as your MAO. In doing so, you need to get both the seller and the bank on board with a short sale.

  • Plumbing Contractor · rutherfordton, NC · Member since 2008 · 66 posts · 0 votes
    17y

    guys, why would you not put in your holding cost in the formula? i understand it shouldnt be an expense with a good buyers list, but just in case it was, i would want it covered in my offer, so its not out of pocket or into my profit. please explain your thinking.

  • Will BarnardPro Member
    Moderator
    Developer · Santa Clarita, CA · Member since 2008 · 15k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    17y

    Chevis, the reason for the max offer of 65% is because holding costs are already factored into that figure. Or you could offer 70% less holding costs as another example.

  • Rental Property Investor · Mercer Island, WA · Member since 2008 · 22k+ posts · 14k+ votes
    17y

    Will's exactly right. Another reason is that it's likely your buyers will use 70% of AVR or 65% of ARV as their threshold. As long as price plus repairs are below their threshold, they will buy.

    For a flip, if purchase plus rehab is 70%, and you're using hard money, and you can turn the property in six months, you'll make 10-15% of ARV as your profit. All these other costs, including the holding costs, and in the other 15-20%.

  • Will BarnardPro Member
    Moderator
    Developer · Santa Clarita, CA · Member since 2008 · 15k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    17y

    Of course if you can get an offer of 65% less repairs AND less holding costs, more power/profit to ya!

  • Real Estate Investor · Matthews, NC · Member since 2009 · 28 posts · 1 vote
    17y


    I need help with this deal.
    ARV 219,000
    (.65*219,000)-10,000[repairs]-21,900[holding]-10,000[wholesale fee] = $100,450 MAO

    Now the seller currently owes $157,000 on the property. Would it be an insult for me to offer the seller $100,450 knowing that they owe more than my offer.



    So should I always take what the seller owes on their property into consideration when making my offers? Does a deal ever make sense if my MAO is less than what the seller owes on it (without having to do a short sale)? Would this be a situation where I would ask for seller financing? Basically, is this a good wholesale deal, or is it a dud?

  • Plumbing Contractor · rutherfordton, NC · Member since 2008 · 66 posts · 0 votes
    17y

    thanks jon and nationwide, the numbers make sens, i didnt catch it before when reading...jumped ahead of myself....paul, my opinion, though not worth much, offer it, all they can do is say no. i have a deal in the making right now where the owner is bringing48% to the table out of their pocket to get out of the house. if this goes through, and it looks good, it will be my biggest money maker to date! good luck!

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.