Agent wants 2% for not selling a house

Agent wants 2% for not selling a house

Real Estate Investor · Saint Petersburg, FL · Member since 2013 · 56 posts · 13 votes

I have a rehab property that was close to completion when a cash buyer walked up to the property with offer and a bank statement in hand showing he had the funds to purchase. My business partner and I decided to accept his offer. I informed the agent that helped me purchase the property and he was understandably upset and wants 2% which roughly equals $3600. I have worked with this agent in the past on several other deals and there was a general understanding that we would use him to list all properties that he helped us buy. My business partner and I prepared all the paperwork and went through the negotiations ourselves. There is no written agreement between us and the agent for this property. If I do not hand over the 2%, the agent inferred that I would be off of his "list", at the moment he calls me at least twice week to look at houses. My partner and I would like to live up to our word and pay the agent something. The buyer brought in an agent to help him with the paperwork and the buyer paid the agent $1,200. I thought paying $1,200 to my agent would be more than fair. He did get paid on the acquisition and told me he maybe spent 4 hours on this property. My agent does do some research and previews properties for me without me telling him to do so, he feels that I am devaluing him by cutting him out of the deal. I feel that it is a little ridiculous for him to feel that he deserves 2% for selling a property that he did not sell. I have a sneaking suspicion that even if we do pay him the $1,200, the effect would be the same as if we did not pay him at all, that effect being he won't be calling and looking for properties on my behalf. I hate to lose his local knowledge and maybe I am being too loyal, as this agent has been with me since the beginning (approx. 13 months) when most agents would not even give me the time of day. I recently earned my license so I have access to the same inventory he does. I have reached out to other brokers I have dealt with before and explained the situation and the general consensus seems to be that I am crazy for even considering giving him anything. Any and all input welcome! Thanks.

0Reply
150 views

Most Popular Reply

Ned CareyPro Member
Moderator
Investor · Baltimore, MD · Member since 2008 · 17k+ posts · 13k+ votes
12y

The red flag is that he "demanded" 2%.  Knowing he had nothing to do with the sale, and asking if you could throw him a bone, I wouldn't hold against him. The fact he asked in a way that implies he is absolutely entitled to it would concern me. 

I would have been tempted to give him something (perhaps the $1200 you suggested) even if he didn't ask. Now I would be tempted to say, "I was going to give this to you any way but since you don't appreciate it I am taking my business elsewhere."  That is known as the Takeaway in negotiating. If he apologizes you can continue and grow you relationship. If he acts like a jerk then you know you made the right decision. 

As far as him telling other agents I would not be the least concerned as long as you have been fair to him. If he is a true jerk no one will listen to him anyway.  If you do things right and honorably then others will see that over time.

See this reply in the discussion

78 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • J ScottPro Member
    Moderator
    Investor · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2008 · 18k+ posts · 17k+ votes
    12y
    Originally posted by @Wayne Brooks:

    It all depends, and we don't know, how much effort he put into finding the property(s) in the first place.  I know it's not worth a lot of extra work scouring around for $100k houses or less, unless there's also a commission on the back end.  That's the bait all the flippers use to get an agent to do a lot of extra work, for the small commission on the front end of the flip.

     I would agree with this IF he hadn't used the agent for multiple transactions.  If the agent found him one low-priced deal and didn't get the relisting, I can see how that would suck.  But, if the agent found him 5 low-priced deals and got the relisting on the other 4, then the agent needs to suck it up and accept that he's not always going to get paid.

    All that said, I would have paid the agent his full 3% (without a discussion) UP UNTIL the time he started demanding money.  I'm a proponent of treating people well (over and above), but the minute someone takes the attititude that they DESERVE to be treated over and above, I would walk away.

  • Specialist · Memphis, TN · Member since 2012 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    12y

    If he is a part of your team pay him what he wants. It is nothing in return for getting him to still call you twice a week. Consider it an entertainment and marketing expense. Pay your team well all the time, keep the relationship. This is a relationship business.

    It is NOT true at all that there are plenty of other agents out there to replace him. A good agent is like gold. Very few really undestand investors and even fewer are loyal so if you have one liek that look after them. I personally would say something like:

    " I think you are being a prick on this deal but I value you as  a part of my team so here is your check. You owe me one. Now buy me lunch"

    And then put it behind you

  • Investor, Entrepreneur, Educator · Springfield, MO · Member since 2009 · 21k+ posts · 12k+ votes
    12y

    Be nice, tell him you can't just cut a check, tell him there is no contractual basis for a property that sold, so ask him to put his justification in a letter to you and you'll take it to your partner saying the last thing we want is any backlash. But you need a letter as a billing and explaining why as you can't, at this point, assign costs of settlement to that property and you need it for accounting. 

    After you get the letter, turn a copy over to his broker and the Board of Realtors, you'll cover your tail as to any backlash or bad mouthing which is another ethics violation.

    If he doesn't want to do business with you, as others mentioned, other broker/agents will.

    I think the agent knows better and is having a bad quarter.

    If you really want to keep him (don't know why) get the letter, then negotiate to make him happy enough.

    If he ditches you, you have the letter to bring to the surface with his broker and more than likely, the broker will appoint a better agent to represent you, the broker understands you have grounds for a more serious complaint.

    When folks don't act right, get them to take another step in the wrong direction with proof of what they are doing, then you got'em. He won't be saying anything, as you can cause him more grief than he can cause you. Besides, other agents have been stiffed before, they know what the issue is and it's his fault for not contracting in that manner in the first place.  :) 

  • Flipper/Rehabber · Rochester, NY · Member since 2014 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    12y

    The problem is, even if you paid him you wouldn't be able to totally trust him now. And he probably wouldn't quite trust you. I'd plan on moving on.

    Also, he has shown that he can be a bit of a loose cannon. And that won't change even if you make amends over this particular incident.  Or I should say if you mollify him, because you've done nothing wrong.  As others have said, he made a commission when you purchased. And your understanding was that you would list with him when the time came but it never came with this property. 

    Move on. 

  • Real Estate Investor · Saint Petersburg, FL · Member since 2013 · 56 posts · 13 votes
    12y

    I appreciate all the responses. I do think he provides value to my business and definitely want to keep him in my tool belt. There have been properties where I wanted to make an offer that he did not think would be money makers and he would talk me off the ledge and assure me that there is a better deal out there. I want to believe he does have my best interest at heart. Perhaps I chose my words incorrectly in the heat of the moment but he never used the word demand or deserve. I am going to pay him the $1,200 as I believe this is the morally right thing to do as I did indicate that he would receive something on the back end, however vague that agreement may have been. So, only time will tell if I am still on his "list". Going forward everything will be on paper. At least my conscious will be clear. Another factor in this decision is that I intend to farm a completely different area than the area that this agent works to cast a wider net. However, I will have to wait and see if he calls me to look at other properties if he doesn't that is OK too I will just have a little more work to do.

  • Real Estate Investor · New York City, NY · Member since 2014 · 121 posts · 47 votes
    12y

    From a purely legal point, since there is no written agreement, the agent isn't owned anything, but you did say in your question that there was a "general understanding that we would use him to list all properties that he helped us buy".  

    If he is working hard to bring you deals and he is under the impression that he will get the buy and sell side, then it makes sense that he is upset.  It comes down to what you have both discussed and what the expectation was. 

  • Bear, DE · Member since 2014 · 178 posts · 65 votes
    12y

    Marc,

    My question to you is this: Did you have a good relationship with the agent? It sound like you did because he did not have you sign a listing agreement. Myself I would never do that, it's not personal it's business so I ask all client's to sign the listing agreement or we can't do business. That agreement insures I will receive my commission for my work/cost involved in marketing this property. MLS fees are not FREE.

    It also gives you the assurance that I'll do my best to get the property sold. 

    My other question. Has this agent been in your corner and helped you with previous projects? See the investor that walked up most likely saw the listing and went around the process. That agent went around it too but if you didn't have an agreement I could see why. Is the $3600 worth it or could you do a lot more business?

    What so many do not understand is that when an agent get a listing it's work, time, and cost involved. 

    The strange part too this, is that the buyer paid his own agent. During any real estate transaction normally the fee is paid by the seller. That commission is split between agent and broker and in this cause the buyers agent would get a cut too. 

    So that $1200 you want to pay is split. Some brokerages will not allow agents to take a listing with such a small commission because you end up spending more than what you will receive. We and the office has cost, it's a business. 

    Flip the situation, place yourself in the agent shoes --- if you worked to get the property sold and someone went around the process wouldn't you want the 2%? So many people do not want to pay, business is about paying and charging. 

    @Michael Camaglia  the agent is suppose to get paid from any transaction that an agent assisted with the selling. Just like the title company, lawyer, etc.  Just like you expect to get paid we do too!

    The commission when you buy is not paid by the buyer, it's paid by the seller. When you sell and we assist through the listing, a commission is paid.  

    If you start to work with other Realtor's, they will ask for that agreement! 

  • Investor and Real Estate Agent · Maize, KS · Member since 2014 · 270 posts · 53 votes
    12y

    don't pay him a penny. That's a joke.

    My day job is managing a rental car vendor and if I rent to a customer once a month for 6 months ; then make a reservation for him for month 7 but he cancels due to a screaming good deal he gets from another vendor I don't deserve compensation for that month.

    Sounds ridiculous huh ? That's how ridiculous it sounds for

    1. The agent to ask for anything

    2. You to consider anything

    Every city has an abundance of agents so saying it will be hard for you to find someone else who will look for properties for you simply isn't true. Tell the agent not only will you not compensate him but just for treating you this way ; your deducting 1 % from your next transaction with him and will find another agent if he doesn't change his stance .

  • Chagrin Falls, OH · Member since 2014 · 17 posts · 23 votes
    12y
    Originally posted by @Sean Brooks:

    Marc,

    My question to you is this: Did you have a good relationship with the agent? It sound like you did because he did not have you sign a listing agreement. Myself I would never do that, it's not personal it's business so I ask all client's to sign the listing agreement or we can't do business. That agreement insures I will receive my commission for my work/cost involved in marketing this property. MLS fees are not FREE.

    It also gives you the assurance that I'll do my best to get the property sold. 

    My other question. Has this agent been in your corner and helped you with previous projects? See the investor that walked up most likely saw the listing and went around the process. That agent went around it too but if you didn't have an agreement I could see why. Is the $3600 worth it or could you do a lot more business?

    What so many do not understand is that when an agent get a listing it's work, time, and cost involved. 

    The strange part too this, is that the buyer paid his own agent. During any real estate transaction normally the fee is paid by the seller. That commission is split between agent and broker and in this cause the buyers agent would get a cut too. 

    So that $1200 you want to pay is split. Some brokerages will not allow agents to take a listing with such a small commission because you end up spending more than what you will receive. We and the office has cost, it's a business. 

    Flip the situation, place yourself in the agent shoes --- if you worked to get the property sold and someone went around the process wouldn't you want the 2%? So many people do not want to pay, business is about paying and charging. 

    @Michael Camaglia  the agent is suppose to get paid from any transaction that an agent assisted with the selling. Just like the title company, lawyer, etc.  Just like you expect to get paid we do too!

    The commission when you buy is not paid by the buyer, it's paid by the seller. When you sell and we assist through the listing, a commission is paid.  

    If you start to work with other Realtor's, they will ask for that agreement! 

     Correct  - I am a licensed agent as well and quite aware. In this situation there was no listing agreement and the agent did not help with nor facilitate the sale. Using your example if you normally get title insurance from company X and you get no title insurance on this house - Company X isn't entitled to their fee because you normally get title insurance from them.

  • Investor · Dallas, TX · Member since 2014 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    12y
    Originally posted by @Curt Davis:

    There are plenty of other agents who would love to have your business.  If you decide to pay your agent the $1,200 make sure they will still provide you with the service you have been getting.  

    Remember, you are the reason this agent makes money when you purchase.  Though you stated he would be your selling agent, the home never made it to that stage for him to list. 

    You are not screwing any agent.  He made his money when you purchased.  

    Good luck

    Completely agree with Curt.  The agent gets paid, when he does work.  In this case, he was compensated for his effort, when you purchased.  He did no work to bring in this buyer and spent no money on marketing.  I think the fact you are even considering compensating him for the fact he isn't going to be able to sell this deal speaks volumes for your sense of fair play and your integrity. 

    My advice is to do what you feel is right and don't feel pressured by either the agent or some chronic Eeyores here on BP.  :)  Also, if this is the response I got from my agent, I would seriously consider finding someone who regards our relationship with a little more regard!

  • Greg H.Pro Member
    Moderator
    Broker/Flipper · Austin, TX · Member since 2013 · 4k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    12y

    Marc-

    I have been a broker and flipper for many years. As a broker, it would never have occurred to me to ask for a commission.  I would have said that is great and it's time for me to find you another property so we can both make some more money .  I didn't procure the buyer or help in the completion of the transaction and I got paid for the work I did do on the buy side

    Some of said that if you do not pay the 2% it may tarnish your relationship moving forward.  But that has probably happened from both sides already correct ?

    While I am a broker, I do list many of my properties with other agents due to the fact they are not in my immediate area.  Many ask or have even tried to give me a referral fee or discount their commission because I am a broker.  I always decline because I know how hard the business can be and I want their full effort

  • Investor · Southeast, MI · Member since 2012 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    12y

    I would never pay for services not rendered. Your agent was paid a commission when you purchased. He did nothing on the sale side. What if you had rented the house out instead of selling, would his panties be all in a bunch then?

    I'm a broker and an investor. My opinion is that it's a lot easier for a good investor to find a good agent than it is for a good agent to find a good investor. A lot of investors go straight to the listing agent on purchases to get a better deal. It sounds like you are loyal to this guy. If you've bought and sold other houses with this guy and will continue to do so, he needs to get his hand out of your pocket on this sale.

  • Real Estate Lender and Broker · Dallas, TX · Member since 2013 · 966 posts · 500 votes
    12y

    I would ask you a couple of questions.  1. What was the purchase price of the property when he represented you?  If you bought it really cheap, I could understand where he would want to be compensated on the selling end.  2. Do you value his relationship and does he make you money?  If so, then I would pay him the 3600.  I did over 400 flips in the 90s and occasionally, I would run into someone who was a great source of properties.  I would have no qualms paying them on the sales even if I sold it myself.  It is a cost of maintaining a good profitable relationship.

    Mark

  • Investor, Entrepreneur, Educator · Springfield, MO · Member since 2009 · 21k+ posts · 12k+ votes
    12y

    You still need a billing for your accounting if you pay him. If he's an agent he may well be cheating his broker charging fees other than commissions on closed sales! If he is going to charge for advising, his broker needs to approve such arrangements, under his agent's license he can't free lance RE business. He could lose his license acting without a broker involved. He's selling his professional soul pretty cheap, and you own him. I don't deal with extortion tactics unless they opened the door first, which it appears he did. I wouldn't burn the guy at the stake but I'd make him realize he can't be pulling stuff either. Yes, have a better meeting of the minds before you go further with him.

    Really, I would have a trust issue as well, I've never met a Realtor I had to work with, there are always others. :)

  • Real Estate Investor · Audubon, PA · Member since 2009 · 13k+ posts · 8k+ votes
    12y

    What if you had kept this as a rental - would he demand a cut of rents? Or demand a couple of percent of what it should have sold for if it wasn't kept?

  • Rental Property Investor · NY · Member since 2013 · 844 posts · 350 votes
    12y
    I agree with Steve Babiak what if you went into foreclosure and lost the home would he help pay off the debt? I don't think so.
  • Real Estate Broker · Cleveland Dayton Cincinnati Toledo Columbus & Akron, OH · Member since 2013 · 30k+ posts · 20k+ votes
    12y

    As an Agent & an Investor.

    I do not feel you owe the agent anything in this situation.

  • Real Estate Broker · Cleveland Dayton Cincinnati Toledo Columbus & Akron, OH · Member since 2013 · 30k+ posts · 20k+ votes
    12y
  • Landlord and Rehabber · Newton, MA · Member since 2010 · 2k+ posts · 877 votes
    12y

    SInce you indicated you have done other deals with him it seems that he is being a bit of a pissy b*tch.  How many deals have you bought and sold with him?

    Now IF he had been hustling for you for 13 months and this was first deal you guys did I would have a bit more sympathy for him.  As @Wayne Brooks  pointed out no agent is generally getting rich with the buy commissions on properties to be rehabbed.  

    But like @J Scott said if you have done like 5 buys and he relisted 4 already then he needs to put on his big boy pants and not cut off his nose to spite his face.

    You indicated you now have your license and have access to the same inventory he does. That says to me that he isn't bringing you pocket listings that never make it to MLS or is also an REO agent that gets you the scoop on the best potential deals so you can put in an offer the minute it is listed or something like that. Think about what true value he brings and if that outweighs the unprofessional stance he is taking.

    FYI if he didn't ask for it I would probably have looked into giving him something as well if he did put a lot of work into finding me the buy side deal. 

  • REALTOR® · Altamonte Springs, FL · Member since 2013 · 71 posts · 32 votes
    12y

    Hey @Marc Pfleger 

    I see you seem to have made a decision, but I would like to add my 2 cents, especially as I am a Realtor in the same state:

    I think @J Scott hit the nail on the head with everything he said in this thread.

    Personally I do a lot of work for nothing. I've worked for 3 buyers today, at home and driving around using my own gas, almost 12 hours off and on today. So if I was expecting to sell a home, that I had done 4 hours work on, then yes I be slightly miffed. But I'd get over it right away, and onto the next property especially if you had reassured me it was simply a one-off.

    He is being greedy, I'm sorry to say, but maybe that's because he's losing commission on each deal—who knows what he's thinking? Maybe he wants to cut the cord and is using this as an excuse?

    Also he sees you have your license now, and he might be wondering why you wanted it when he was doing a good job for you. You have the same access to active properties through myfloridahomesmls.com if you don't have a license. (it's owned by the same company, CoreLogic) But you had your reasons obviously.

    I hope you resolve your situation, but if not, then welcome to our side of the fence!

  • Wholesaler · Mount Pleasant, SC · Member since 2014 · 45 posts · 10 votes
    12y

    I appear to be in the minority, but I would pay the realtor the full 3%.  They took the time and help you with your business.  Few things can be better than a good realtor/client relationship and throwing it away for 3 grand on a decent size deal just doesn't make a lot of sense to me.  Pay the realtor because their value to you is worth more than the 3 grand you are talking about. 

    Just my .02.  

  • Specialist · Memphis, TN · Member since 2012 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    12y

    You are right on @George Wendt this is a relationship business and is a chance to build an even closer relationship with a trusted professional associate. i am stunned so many people consider the relationship as so valueless. There must be some cities in America where there are lots of good agents. i have never found one yet, most cities have a handful of great people and thousands of terrible ones!

  • Real Estate Investor · Atlanta, GA · Member since 2013 · 42 posts · 23 votes
    12y

    The issue here is who is the procuring cause of the deal. While it may have appeared to you that the buyer just randomly walked up with a contract and POF in hand, they very well may have seen some marketing from the agent. When you pay a commission you are paying for a lot of things including the marketing so it's not all about who negotiated or filled out the paperwork. In addition if your deal with the agent was that he got to list properties he found you then you should by all means live up to that. Many investors use that strategy because it's successful in landing them deals. Not paying the $3600 could cost you tens of thousands in lost profits in the future with this agent and possibly others.

  • Queen City, TX · Member since 2014 · 50 posts · 6 votes
    12y

    Actually You sound like someone Ide like to do business with in the future.  I wont be greedy. I'll cut you a better deal than this guy.

  • J ScottPro Member
    Moderator
    Investor · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2008 · 18k+ posts · 17k+ votes
    12y
    Originally posted by @Kathryn C.:

    The issue here is who is the procuring cause of the deal. While it may have appeared to you that the buyer just randomly walked up with a contract and POF in hand, they very well may have seen some marketing from the agent. When you pay a commission you are paying for a lot of things including the marketing so it's not all about who negotiated or filled out the paperwork. In addition if your deal with the agent was that he got to list properties he found you then you should by all means live up to that. Many investors use that strategy because it's successful in landing them deals. Not paying the $3600 could cost you tens of thousands in lost profits in the future with this agent and possibly others.

    I've already said that I would typically pay the agent a full commission, because that's the way I personally do things.  But, I can certainly see the other side, and here are some thoughts on the response above:

    -  I agree that if the agent was marketing the property, the agent is entitled to a commission regardless of whether it was the marketing that brought the buyer.  That said, I'd be pissed if one of my agents was marketing a property before it was complete and before we had discussed that s/he should start marketing it.  So, if the agent was marketing the property without the OP's permission, that's even worse.

    -  If the agent is greedy (as the original post would insinuate), it begs the question of whether the agent would really respect his/her fiduciary responsibility to the OP in the future.  What if the agent saw an opportunity in the future to make some extra money at the expense of the OP (for example, soft negotiation to generate a higher sale price) -- would s/he do it?  Based on the little that we know of this agent, it sounds like a reasonable possibility.  That's not the type of agent I want representing me.

    -  Based on the attitude the OP described of the agent, my guess is that the relationship is already strained -- possibly irreparably.  So, even if the OP pays the extortion money...I mean "commission"...I'm not sure I'd recommend trying to work with this agent in the future.  The OP may find that the agent is already doing things to negatively impact the his business.

    All signs point to the fact the relationship between the OP and the agent is effectively over; at that point, it becomes (to me, at least) a question of whether there is a moral obligation to pay the agent -- it's no longer a question of whether it's the strategic thing to do (it's not).  If the agent didn't do anything to procure the buyer, I say don't pay.  That simple.

    And again, if it were my agent and he didn't act as if he were entitled to the commission, I would have happily paid it anyway...strategically, that would have been the better decision BEFORE the agent started making demands.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.