Massachusetts Investors: Cash Flow or Location?

Massachusetts Investors: Cash Flow or Location?

Real Estate Agent · Boston, MA · Member since 2025 · 89 posts · 28 votes

If you had to choose in today’s Massachusetts-area market, would you take better cash flow farther out or lower cash flow in a stronger location? What’s winning for you right now?

0Reply
301 views

1 Reply

Jump to latestLatest
  • James JonesPro Member
    Investor · Collierville, TN 38017 · Member since 2017 · 1k+ posts · 710 votes
    1mo

    Cash flow wins, every time.

    I buy sub-$100K single-family houses in Memphis that rent for $1,395 to $1,950 on Section 8. That's the 1% rule working. A "strong location" that cash flows $200 a month is a hope-and-pray strategy. You're betting on appreciation to bail you out.

    I'd rather have $600 a month in real cash flow from a solid working-class neighborhood than $200 a month in a prime zip code. Location matters for tenant quality and vacancy, but it doesn't pay the mortgage. Cash flow does.

    Run the 1% rule. If the rent doesn't hit it, the location isn't strong enough for an investor, no matter how nice the street looks.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.