Really high rental yields for cheaper housing - what's the catch?

Really high rental yields for cheaper housing - what's the catch?

San Mateo, CA · Member since 2014 · 5 posts · 4 votes

I'm looking at some data to identify the best areas to buy and hold. I'm less familiar with buying in some of these areas - so I thought I'd reach out. These zipcodes offer really high rental yields even accounting for the vacancy stats. I'm wondering what's the catch?

Zip City State Median Home Price ($) Average Rent ($) Gross rental yied 2013 Rental vacancy rate by Zip (%)
13165 Town of Waterloo NY 79,100 1,365 20.7% 6.7
13411 Pittsfield NY 76,400 1,424 22.4% 7.4
14125 Town of Oakfield NY 87,500 1,400 19.2% 4
14437 Dansville NY 81,300 1,416 20.9% 3.7
14445 East Rochester NY 95,800 1,289 16.1% 1.4
14510 Mount Morris NY 72,600 1,399 23.1% 4.1
14517 Town of Nunda NY 78,100 1,441 22.1% 7.5
14605 Rochester NY 40,900 828 24.3% 3.6
14608 Rochester NY 51,100 866 20.3% 6.3
14611 Rochester NY 47,400 855 21.6% 4
14621 Rochester NY 44,700 848 22.8% 5.4
14715 Town of Bolivar NY 47,400 1,401 35.5% 4.6
14727 Town of Cuba NY 69,800 1,456 25.0% 4.7
14735 Granger NY 57,800 1,402 29.1% 5.9
14739 Town of Friendship NY 46,300 1,395 36.2% 6.5
14806 Town of Andover NY 49,000 1,402 34.3% 5.1
14813 Amity NY 55,100 1,433 31.2% 4.2
14891 Watkins Glen NY 106,800 1,449 16.3% 1
14895 Wellsville NY 50,300 1,392 33.2% 3.6
15045 Glassport PA 53,100 776 17.5% 2.6
15110 Duquesne PA 44,500 780 21.0% 6.4
15132 McKeesport PA 46,000 780 20.3% 2.2
15148 Wilmerding PA 46,500 806 20.8% 0.5
15210 Pittsburgh PA 54,400 876 19.3% 3.4
21521 Barton MD 66,400 1,217 22.0% 5.1
21562 Westernport MD 59,600 1,279 25.8% 4.9
44055 Lorain OH 52,500 712 16.3% 1.3
44102 Cleveland OH 48,000 821 20.5% 6.2
44104 Cleveland OH 43,200 835 23.2% 8.3
61401 Galesburg IL 64,200 1,058 19.8% 4.1
73108 Oklahoma City OK 43,900 653 17.8% 3.8
73111 Oklahoma City OK 49,200 718 17.5% 0.7
1Reply
112 views

Most Popular Reply

Property Manager · Pittsburgh, PA · Member since 2012 · 267 posts · 136 votes
11y

For me the catch is the "boots on the ground" knowledge to know which areas are safe with a strong rental base.  I can only speak to PA on your list.  Certain areas of McKeesport and Glassport are fine.  I would stay way from Duquense and Wilmerding because they constantly come up in the morning news.....not for good things.  Knowing the neighborhood is everything....a few streets apart can be different worlds as it relates to drugs, crime, etc.

See this reply in the discussion

36 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Real Estate Broker · Orlando, FL · Member since 2013 · 57 posts · 15 votes
    11y

    @Rahul Bhandar As for what a mgmt company will and will not handle comes down to how hands on or hands off you want to be. I've got some clients that like to know each and every detail as to what is going on. Why was the tenant late, why was it $x dollars and some change to fix that leak and not $y dollars and change.. etc And then I've got some clients who as long as the cash flow stays positive and the check is there every month we never hear from them. In our Prop MGMT Agreement we have a $250 maintenance limit. Anything under that amount we just fix and bill anything over we quote and send for approval. Obviously major repairs like septic tanks, roofs, and the works we quote and wait for approval. It just comes down to the particular client.

    @K. Marie Poe I guess I should have caveated my response with 'typically in my area.' I manage roughly 300 units in Central Florida so I was really basing the credit range/property cost/tenant quality on my experience. I imagine somewhere there is a data set that does dive into the correlation but I was only speaking from my own experience. Alot of Central Florida properties are being priced out for 1st time home buyers and the likes. It's really becoming a renter based community in many areas. 

  • Investor · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2014 · 285 posts · 142 votes
    11y

    @Rahul Bhandari Good looking data! Where did you find it? I've been trying to find info like this for SoCal. Is there a site that aggregates the data? 

  • Real Estate Coach · Venice Beach, CA · Member since 2012 · 6k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    11y

    The catch is- tenants. Tenants will make or break your investment, and lower-quality tenants can be fatal for an investment because of how much they cost. With vacancy comes a ton of expenses, more than is probably being accounted for. Of course the lost months' rent (which is probably what is being accounted for), but tenant turnover- repairs, evictions, finding new tenants, etc. and general maintenance and appliances and such....

    You can do cheap areas and get those higher returns, but you have to know what you are doing. There are some people on here who that's all they do and are very good at it. But it takes an extra level of education (and patience) to do it right. There's a lot of risk associated with those higher returns.

  • Investor · Central Valley, CA · Member since 2012 · 6k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    11y
    Originally posted by @Jared Maltbie:

    @K. Marie Poe I guess I should have caveated my response with 'typically in my area.' I manage roughly 300 units in Central Florida so I was really basing the credit range/property cost/tenant quality on my experience. I imagine somewhere there is a data set that does dive into the correlation but I was only speaking from my own experience. Alot of Central Florida properties are being priced out for 1st time home buyers and the likes. It's really becoming a renter based community in many areas. 

    Renter based communities are happening in many places where the numbers didn't make sense before. Cash investors and hedge funds buying in the $200K range are accepting such low ROR, 1st time home buyers can't compete.  I know because I've gotten offers from both and I usually end up selling to the investor buyer.

  • Real Estate Broker · St. Louis, MO · Member since 2014 · 206 posts · 194 votes
    11y

    There is no "catch," but you do get what you pay for. I invest in St. Louis, MO and purchase in what I would consider to be B & C neighborhoods. I consider a C neighborhood to be one where it is (a) relatively safe and (b) most tenants, although not all, are government subsidized. I have a very high ROI, but those returns do not come as easy as it would in some better neighborhoods. I look for 20-25% cash on cash unlevered returns, which includes vacancy, taxes, insurance, etc.

    I would not suggest investing in these "higher yielding" areas unless you are personally familiar with the area and the specific house for which you are investing. These are not NNN properties and they should not be treated or sold "turnkey" as such.

    There is certainly money to be made in this segment, but you have to treat it like a business and not like a financial product with a predictable rate of return and fixed value.                 

  • Engineer · Portland, OR · Member since 2014 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    11y

    @Lee L.   

    http://www.zillow.com/research/data/

    you should be able to download enough housing data, in .xls format,to keep you busy for weeks.  Cross reference this with general demographic data from a site like USA.net or city-data to make an intelligent analysis.

    @Dustin S. 

    Your Housing price vs. Housing Appreciation theory seems to make sense.  However I believe it's incorrect  Without even normalizing for systematic risks the current value of house prices generally resemble future expectations of its worth on average given the whole housing market in total over time, much like stocks.  So cheap houses have their expected appreciation or depreciation "priced in" much the same way as a more expensive house would.  If you had any objective evidence you could link showing the correlation you mention I would be interested in seeing it.

  • Investor · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2014 · 285 posts · 142 votes
    11y

    @Steve B. That's excellent info. Thanks so much. I've learned so much from BP so far!

  • Broker · Logan, UT · Member since 2013 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    11y

    Also, there are markets with a high percentage of Section 8 tenant which may drive rents. (Section 8 brackets rent ranges for size of unit)  

    Housing prices may fall in these markets faster than Section 8 bracketing adjusts, leaving a high rent to value ratio in low income and recently pounded markets.

    It would be interesting to look the markets on your spreadsheet and see how they have performed (HPI) over the last decade.

    Interesting topic!

  • Rochester, NY · Member since 2014 · 83 posts · 19 votes
    11y
    Originally posted by @Stephen Masek:

    Another major issue is resale.  Our understanding is that getting bank loans to buy properties worth $50,000 and less is impossible.  That means your only option to sell the low-end properties is to find another investor, or do seller financing.  The owner-occupants will not be able to get loans, or if they have the cash, will probably put it down on a nicer house, instead of paying cash for a house worth less than $50,000.      

    I'm not sure what cases this is true, or untrue in. I am using conventional financing to purchase a rental property and when I called Bank of America asking if there was a minimum (75k, 50k, 40k, etc.) the mortgage agent told me there was no minimum as long as I put 25% down. Ultimately, I'm going with another bank that only requires 15% (with PMI) or 20% without, but they did not mention anything about a minimum either, we're purchasing the home for 50k. The above poster may be correct in instances of 3.5% or 5% owner occupancy.

  • Real Estate Broker · Cleveland, OH · Member since 2012 · 771 posts · 252 votes
    11y

    @Rahul Bhandari 

    It's not so much a "catch" as it is a trade off. As @James Wise and several others here have said...

    Higher yields generally mean lower priced properties and monthly rental amounts, lower income tenants, and less desirable areas with less hope of appreciation.

    Lower yields generally mean just the opposite, higher priced properties and monthly rental amounts, higher income tenants, and more desirable areas with more hope of appreciation.

    Don't think of it so much as an either / or proposition, but more of a continuum with varying degrees of risk and reward. Ask ten different investors where you should go on that spectrum and you'll likely get ten different answers. Personally, I generally prefer more risk and higher yields to the alternative, as I think cash flow today is a better proposition than the hopes of appreciation tomorrow. Of course, the correct answer for you really depends on your own particular appetite for risk and desired reward. 

    As I understand it, the Cleveland area and many other cities in the mid-west are popular locations for those who invest from a distance to seek better returns. If that's your angle, I strongly recommend you have a strong team in the ground in whatever market you choose to invest to provide you with local expertise and the ability to take care of things for you as needed. I can't vouch for markets other than Cleveland, but here things can change very drastically on a street by street basis and just looking at census tract statistics won't give you enough information to understand that. 

    If you're looking for more Cleveland specific knowledge, I've worked extensively with both James Wise and @Christian Carson and can personally vouch for them. James is a realtor, investor, and property manager that caters specifically to investors and understands the business very well. Realtors with that focus are knowledge are really rather rare. Both Christian and myself are attorneys with an accounting background and experience in real estate investment that could provide you with additional knowledge. I'm certain there are many others on here that could be of help to you as well. Best of luck to you.

    Tim

  • Lender · Rochester, NY · Member since 2014 · 3k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    11y

    I see a lot of these areas are in or near Rochester NY. I don't think these returns take into account the property taxes. Although, there are decent returns are taxes are high here and older homes require maintenance. Depending on the tenants you bring in some can cause damage or also bring in things like bed bugs, cochroaches, mice from not being cleanly. Yes, it is the landlords responsibility to pay for the extermination of all these pests. So, we have never seen that great of returns, but we try and keep our properties nice and decent. We have seen many houses that a ran by landlords that don't want to stick money into the homes, and there are much greater returns than. Just my opinion though. 

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.