@Tzook Bar Noy the problem with your ROI calculation is that it has nothing to do with the 1-2% rule. That is because it is all about income and expense, which varies. Your low ROI stems from the fact this is an all cash deal. Run the numbers if you were to finance the property with 20% down ($17K).
$68K for 30 years at 5% yields a payment of $365 per month or $4380 per year
So your net income is $1500, which would be an ROI of 8.8% based on $17K down payment.
I would also challenge your insurance number as being too high. I pay half that much for a property worth twice as much. Assuming your actual insurance was $400, then it changes to this:
$1900 with an ROI of 11.1% based on $17K down payment.
You can see how a small change in income will affect your ROI. In another situation if you self manage and have no vacancy, then your ROI increases to 26%.
Financing not only means higher ROI, but also leaves money for down payments on several other properties. You can buy four properties instead of one and your net income increases 4X.
@Tzook Bar Noy that's why your ROI is so low. Change your numbers to reflect a 20-25% down pmnt and a mortgage on the remainder. Now your investment is a way lower number Also my area doesn't need that much vacancy or depending On the property I don't need that much for repairs. Make sure all your numbers are real not ball park. They all look high compared to my areas. RR
@Tzook Bar Noy the problem with your ROI calculation is that it has nothing to do with the 1-2% rule. That is because it is all about income and expense, which varies. Your low ROI stems from the fact this is an all cash deal. Run the numbers if you were to finance the property with 20% down ($17K).
$68K for 30 years at 5% yields a payment of $365 per month or $4380 per year
So your net income is $1500, which would be an ROI of 8.8% based on $17K down payment.
I would also challenge your insurance number as being too high. I pay half that much for a property worth twice as much. Assuming your actual insurance was $400, then it changes to this:
$1900 with an ROI of 11.1% based on $17K down payment.
You can see how a small change in income will affect your ROI. In another situation if you self manage and have no vacancy, then your ROI increases to 26%.
Financing not only means higher ROI, but also leaves money for down payments on several other properties. You can buy four properties instead of one and your net income increases 4X.
My farm area is Decatur mainly 30032, Many of the investors I work with typically look for 10% or more roi in that area...7.9% isnt bad but depending on your exit strategy, and your numbers it isnt the best deal.
I have a deal that on the bottom line will cost: 85K
rent is 1050$ monthly,
a year = 12600
and expenses:
- manegement - 10% rent = 1260
- insurance = 800
- tax = 1300
- fixes 10% = 1260
- vacancy 10% = 1260
total income = 12600
total expenses = 5880
yearly profit = 6720
ROI cash only = 7.9%
** this home is on Decatur area in Georgia
Is my calculations right? it looks good at first, but super lower roi then expected...
The 1% rule is bull&*$# and it's doing more harm than good for those of you applying it. Instead, learn to run your own investment analysis, including the cash-on-cash return (COC) and internal rate of return (IRR). Google "APOD" (which stands for Annual Property Operating Data) to locate the form/template that will help you create your own investment analysis in excel. The APOD is a form developed by CCIM to standardize the investment analysis of real estate investments.
The insurance numbers definitely seem a bit high for that area. In that zip code the going rate for insurance is nearly half the amount you listed. I would shop around for a better rate. Also, as others have mentioned you have to take into account the down payment on a loan for the property as opposed to an outright cash purchase. This will change the ROI significantly. Makes more financial sense in my opinion.