Seller is TRYING to walk with the last months rent!

Seller is TRYING to walk with the last months rent!

Sandwich, MA · Member since 2018 · 103 posts · 57 votes

We closed on a three family on the 4th and everything we received from the seller had stated he collected last month's rent from each unit, so we show up to the closing with the understanding that $2,600 would be deducted from the purchase price. Once the seller views the HUD he declares that he never collected last months rent and he only had the tenants pay first months rent and move in.

My closing attorney challenges him saying the info we received from his realtor had stated each unit paid last months rent upon moving in. This disclosure was not signed by the seller and the listing agent took responsibility for the “error”. RED FLAG went up and after talking with our attorney we decided to withhold $2,600 from the seller until we can get to the bottom of the problem.

Rewind two week I had requested the tenants to complete estoppel agreements, but the listing agent said none of the tenants spoke English and the seller lives out of state, so this would be impossible. I translated the document for him and he then said they all have trust issues. I see a trend. Since the closing I have had conversations with all three unit, in English, and they all completed the original estoppel agreement and stated they paid a double payment upon moving in, and the amount thy said to have paid matched the numbers on the “mistake” on the document provided by the listing agent. My attorney is working on the issue and I should hear back today about what course of action we will take moving froward.

I know tenants can lie to get the upper hand, but all three units said the something and the numbers all match. The previous owners TAW agreement with the units are awful (missing dates, unreadable etc) and they have all paid cash in the past so the paper trail is limited to hand written receipts over the past 3-5 years.

What does everyone else think? Solving this problem doesn’t not put more money in my pocket but it can take money out of my pocket.

Oh and the one unit was paying $50 dollars less than was disclosed (verified with receipts from previous owner to tenant) so honesty is not prevalent with the seller agent combo. 

0Reply
40 views

2 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Specialist · Lakewood, CO · Member since 2014 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    7y

    @Alexander Wardell

    Did you actually close? Is the money/lack of ethics enough to walk away from the deal? And is it worth your time to chase the $3k (adding some in for the lower rent)? Does the property perform at the higher price, and are you comfortable with the leases you will inherit and the tenants that signed them?

  • Sandwich, MA · Member since 2018 · 103 posts · 57 votes
    7y

    @Bryan O. 

    Yes we closed. My attorney withheld the $2,600 from the seller at closing until either side can prove he collected deposit/last months rent in the amount of one months rent for each unit or not. Honestly I was not willing to pass up this deal on the grounds of the seller/listing agent being untruthful because anything they could have hid from us was researched and uncovered. I am not trying to deal with the conflict of each tenant moving out in the future and not paying last months because they were under the impression they had already paid, or wanting their deposit back. 

    The purchase price was our absolute max price and although $2,600 is not a lot in the big picture, I would have had serious doubts if the purchase price was increased by the same amount. All the units are TAW on a month to month agreement, which I will be duplicating with my own agreement. As for the rents, I am increasing two of the units ($50 a month for one unit, and $100 a month for the other) to make all three units the same so the $50 lower rent is not a game changer but it does add to the dishonesty of the seller. 

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.