Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

20
Posts
6
Votes
David Kim
  • Seattle, WA
6
Votes |
20
Posts

Is "comparable sales" a good approach for setting list price?

David Kim
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

I'm working on listing a commercial property for sale. One of the brokers I'm talking to prepared a doc showing a comparison between a comparable sales approach, and an income (cap rate) approach, to estimate value per square foot.

The two values are fairly different, with the income based one being the lower of the two, so they're recommending going forward with the comparable sales approach and listing at that price.

My concern is, what if those other sales that we're comparing to were sales to investors shopping on an income basis, which means it's really not an apples-to-apples comparison? How does one determine if it makes sense to go with that higher "comparable sales" value, or if the lower value is more realistic?

I'm leaning towards going forward with it. Worst case, we pivot and lower the price if needed. I just want to make sure they're not deliberately over-estimating, in an attempt to lure me into choosing them over other options. WWYD?

Loading replies...