My current tenant looks like they will NOT renew. My agent has just sent me a listing agreement. This is a first time for me, so I want to pick the brains of the collective for their thoughts.
Commission is 5% if the agent ends up representing the tenant and the landlord. If it's an outside agent for the tenant, the commission is 6%. Weirdly enough if we simply renewed with the current tenant, the commission would be 5%, 2% to my agent and 3% to the tenant's agent. Thoughts on this? I've asked for a total of 5% for a new tenant.
If it's a Net Lease, I need to pay commission on the assumed insurance, taxes, etc. This doesn't seem right to me. Is this standard, or can I ask it to be removed? Why should commission on gross costs?
Real Estate Agent · Fort Worth, TX · Member since 2022 · 25 posts · 16 votes
6mo
Everything is negotiable, and yes, you can ask for anything to be removed. My advice would be to contact a few different brokers and ask their fees, and that will give you a good idea of what you can negotiate.
What City is this in? In some markets, it's standard to pay commissions on base rent only. But in others I've worked in, the agents get paid for the NNN expenses included.
In my experience in Dallas-Fort Worth, I will usually charge 6-6.75% if a cooperating broker is involved, with 2-2.5% going to the list side and 4-4.5% going to the tenant rep. If no tenant rep is involved, it will be 4.5% only. So it sounds very similar to what you are describing.
Real Estate Agent · Fort Worth, TX · Member since 2022 · 25 posts · 16 votes
6mo
Everything is negotiable, and yes, you can ask for anything to be removed. My advice would be to contact a few different brokers and ask their fees, and that will give you a good idea of what you can negotiate.
What City is this in? In some markets, it's standard to pay commissions on base rent only. But in others I've worked in, the agents get paid for the NNN expenses included.
In my experience in Dallas-Fort Worth, I will usually charge 6-6.75% if a cooperating broker is involved, with 2-2.5% going to the list side and 4-4.5% going to the tenant rep. If no tenant rep is involved, it will be 4.5% only. So it sounds very similar to what you are describing.
Interview a few leasing agents, ask about their marketing plans, recent lease closings, time on market, and ask each of them what they think market rates are for this property.
Cincinnati, OH · Member since 2020 · 4k+ posts · 3k+ votes
6mo
As noted, some of this is market by market, and all agreements are negotiable.
The piece that seems odd, although seemingly a non-issue, is a full 5% on renewal. First, if the tenant were to renew, which I know you state they aren't, you should handle that directly without the help of an agent. Attorney drafts renewal agreement, both sign, and all is well.
Again, likely a non-issue since tenant presumably has told you they are not renewing, but I would at least amend contract to bring down the renewal commission, in the off chance your agent does find a way to get them to renew.
Beyond that, it is not common, in my limited experiences, to have NNNs included in commission calculation. I worked for a landlord that would consider gross leases, too, and if one was signed, commissions were still calculated on effective net rent in those cases too. But as noted, this is likely landlord, brokerage and location dependent on customary practices.
My current tenant looks like they will NOT renew. My agent has just sent me a listing agreement. This is a first time for me, so I want to pick the brains of the collective for their thoughts.
Commission is 5% if the agent ends up representing the tenant and the landlord. If it's an outside agent for the tenant, the commission is 6%. Weirdly enough if we simply renewed with the current tenant, the commission would be 5%, 2% to my agent and 3% to the tenant's agent. Thoughts on this? I've asked for a total of 5% for a new tenant.
If it's a Net Lease, I need to pay commission on the assumed insurance, taxes, etc. This doesn't seem right to me. Is this standard, or can I ask it to be removed? Why should commission on gross costs?
Anything else I need to be aware of?
You do not state what the term of the renewal is, which should be an important factor. "Commercial" in my experience was primarily a 5 year term with two, 5 year renewal "options" with either a pre-determined step up, or tied to CPI. Only small, Mom and Pop type storefronts were ever on a one to three year term on a case by case basis. For the true Commercial Agreements, we typically charged the equivalent of three months base rent as commission for local businesses. National chains are usually a negotiated percentage of the total term of the period.
Property Manager · Calabasas, CA · Member since 2026 · 141 posts · 67 votes
6mo
On the commission calculation question — your instinct is right, and it's worth pushing back. The industry standard I've seen in SoCal is commission on base rent only, not on NNN reimbursements. Those pass-throughs aren't income you're earning from the lease, they're expenses getting passed to the tenant, so paying a leasing commission on taxes and insurance never made sense to me. I've had brokers try to include them and I always negotiate it out.
On the dual-rep commission structure (5% vs 6% with outside tenant rep) — that split is pretty standard, though I'd try to get the total cap at 5% regardless of whether an outside broker is involved. The 6% total with a co-broker situation is more common in some markets but you have room to push.
One thing worth nailing down in the listing agreement: make sure there's a specific carve-out for direct renewals with the current tenant without a commission, and clarify the tail period so you're not paying commission if they come back 6 months after expiration on their own. Those details bite people more than the rate does.
Investor · Fairfax, VA · Member since 2015 · 1k+ posts · 796 votes
6mo
4% if your rep brings a tenant. 6% for an outside rep. Pay structure is on the base rent only and also on the initial term. Absolutely No commissions on renewal terms! 1/2 paid to rep on lease signature, and the other 1/2 paid when the new tenant receives their Certificate of Occupancy!
Real Estate Broker · Canton, GA · Member since 2010 · 15k+ posts · 11k+ votes
6mo
Its whatever you negotiate. I have found after using dozens of leasing brokers for single tenant that most suck. About 20% do what they say they will do. The rest put you in their listing system and put time in first week then if have to actual work they only come back to it every few weeks with update. Meanwhile owner has to backfill it themselves and still pay a fee. I dont sign agreements now I tell them bring me the tenant and I will pay you if I want them.
You have to watch single tenant leasing brokers also. They are repping the tenants lots of times and will tell you your dark building can only get this much rent when taking your listing agreement to give their tenant in tow a cherry deal. I had this happen recently where I have A location dirt. Leasing rep said rents 18 a foot when Crexi had 28 and comps for days of actual in place rents for that box size. They were just trying to land a quick lease job for their tenant they get 6 to 7 sites to sign a year from while trying to screw the seller. Do your own rent comps to see what data says and make them defend their conclusion if you do not agree. If they can't defend and go running they are scamming.
Quick update. I questioned the broker about it and he apologized as the contract was a "cookie cutter" contract and that section on paying commission on insurance, taxes, etc for a NNN should not have been there. Not sure what or how this would have applied in any other situation.