馃憠You don't have to buy a 400-unit for your first deal
But I would recommend this:
Just get started.
Figure out how much time you have to devote to real estate investing and determine your goals.
You can get started in 3 ways:
1. Buy a 6-unit on your own
2. Acquire a 40-unit with a few local partners
3. Invest passively with an experienced real estate investor
Stop procrastinating
Stop having analysis paralysis
Taking no action is the riskiest thing you can do.
// Let me know if you plan on investing in real estate this year 馃憞
@Justin Goodin - I'd be interested to learn more about this.
I want to call out some incongruities here, given that you just DM'd me asking to delete @Melanie P.'s direct challenge to you.
1) Your post is literally titled "You Don't have to buy a 400-unit for your first deal".
2) Melanie is calling you out on this one because the deal at the bottom of your "portfolio" page on your website (a reasonable person can infer that it is the earliest acquisition for Next Level Equity) is literally a 236 unit apartment building, which is a little incongruous with the title of your this forum thread you started.
3) Melanie is directly challenging you, stating that she doesn't believe you were involved in the deal. And, alleging your response deflecting her challenge.
4) You DM'd me asking to delete Melanie's posts.
5) You are the most prolific contributor in this multifamily forum.
You can see why this set of facts is setting off a number of alarm bells for me. My job is to preserve the integrity of this brand, and that starts with an open and honest forum, and the ability to be frank.
Good operators deal with challenges all the time - that's how they raise capital from skeptical LPs, like me.
You can put them all to rest by directly answering Melanie's question. I'd like to know now too.

Thank you for this. I see far too many newbies here ready to go start syndicating and buying 100s of units.... and they've never even met a tenant other than their neighbors. Sure, a few have gone out and killed it on the very first deal, but that is the exception, not the norm. Good advice comes from the norm. That's why they call them "Best" practices, not "Imma SLAY IT on my First Deal" practices.
I started with one dinky little Class C house in a so-so hood in 2005. Still own it to this day. Did I slay with it? Nope, and I never would have gotten someone to do a podcast for me. But... I'm still here in 2024. Lots of the "go big or go home" folks are not here because they went big, lost their shirts, then had to go home. You never hear about the failures, except maybe in the divorce decree filings because they forgot about their spouse and bankrupted their family trying to sprint before they learned to walk.
You are right. My first deal was a renovated duplex that i found on zillow. I didnt have a realtor. I just called the number connected to the posting. I closed in October 2022. Still househacking. Hopes of purchasing #2 duplex end of the year.
Be very careful about what constitutes the "experience" of "an experienced real estate investor." Today I reviewed the website of one of these shady syndicators, Next Level Equity in Indianapolis. Their portfolio page had a project that I was familiar with and based on what I knew I didn't think they could have been involved with it. So I asked the CEO, Justin Goodin, to explain why it was there and he had no explanation and said it, "didn't matter." Keep in mind it was the largest portfolio reference on their entire site.
Many people here hold themselves out as experts and experienced when the training wheels are still on their bicycle. Letting someone train with your investment dollars is a VERY risky proposition.
You are right. My first deal was a renovated duplex that i found on zillow. I didnt have a realtor. I just called the number connected to the posting. I closed in October 2022. Still househacking. Hopes of purchasing #2 duplex end of the year.
Thank you for this. I see far too many newbies here ready to go start syndicating and buying 100s of units.... and they've never even met a tenant other than their neighbors. Sure, a few have gone out and killed it on the very first deal, but that is the exception, not the norm. Good advice comes from the norm. That's why they call them "Best" practices, not "Imma SLAY IT on my First Deal" practices.
I started with one dinky little Class C house in a so-so hood in 2005. Still own it to this day. Did I slay with it? Nope, and I never would have gotten someone to do a podcast for me. But... I'm still here in 2024. Lots of the "go big or go home" folks are not here because they went big, lost their shirts, then had to go home. You never hear about the failures, except maybe in the divorce decree filings because they forgot about their spouse and bankrupted their family trying to sprint before they learned to walk.
Totally agree! Don't focus on unit count when you're getting started. Focus on buying great deals.
@Justin Goodin - I'd be interested to learn more about this.
I want to call out some incongruities here, given that you just DM'd me asking to delete @Melanie P.'s direct challenge to you.
1) Your post is literally titled "You Don't have to buy a 400-unit for your first deal".
2) Melanie is calling you out on this one because the deal at the bottom of your "portfolio" page on your website (a reasonable person can infer that it is the earliest acquisition for Next Level Equity) is literally a 236 unit apartment building, which is a little incongruous with the title of your this forum thread you started.
3) Melanie is directly challenging you, stating that she doesn't believe you were involved in the deal. And, alleging your response deflecting her challenge.
4) You DM'd me asking to delete Melanie's posts.
5) You are the most prolific contributor in this multifamily forum.
You can see why this set of facts is setting off a number of alarm bells for me. My job is to preserve the integrity of this brand, and that starts with an open and honest forum, and the ability to be frank.
Good operators deal with challenges all the time - that's how they raise capital from skeptical LPs, like me.
You can put them all to rest by directly answering Melanie's question. I'd like to know now too.

Thank you for this. I see far too many newbies here ready to go start syndicating and buying 100s of units.... and they've never even met a tenant other than their neighbors. Sure, a few have gone out and killed it on the very first deal, but that is the exception, not the norm. Good advice comes from the norm. That's why they call them "Best" practices, not "Imma SLAY IT on my First Deal" practices.
I started with one dinky little Class C house in a so-so hood in 2005. Still own it to this day. Did I slay with it? Nope, and I never would have gotten someone to do a podcast for me. But... I'm still here in 2024. Lots of the "go big or go home" folks are not here because they went big, lost their shirts, then had to go home. You never hear about the failures, except maybe in the divorce decree filings because they forgot about their spouse and bankrupted their family trying to sprint before they learned to walk.
Totally agree! Don't focus on unit count when you're getting started. Focus on buying great deals.
Wow that's amazing that you still own the property from 05! although it is the hood, i bet you have alot of equity. Have you ever used a HELOC . You are right, we never hear about the failures, only those that typically start out with tons of cash
@Justin Goodin - I'd be interested to learn more about this.
I want to call out some incongruities here, given that you just DM'd me asking to delete @Melanie P.'s direct challenge to you.
1) Your post is literally titled "You Don't have to buy a 400-unit for your first deal".
2) Melanie is calling you out on this one because the deal at the bottom of your "portfolio" page on your website (a reasonable person can infer that it is the earliest acquisition for Next Level Equity) is literally a 236 unit apartment building, which is a little incongruous with the title of your this forum thread you started.
3) Melanie is directly challenging you, stating that she doesn't believe you were involved in the deal. And, alleging your response deflecting her challenge.
4) You DM'd me asking to delete Melanie's posts.
5) You are the most prolific contributor in this multifamily forum.
You can see why this set of facts is setting off a number of alarm bells for me. My job is to preserve the integrity of this brand, and that starts with an open and honest forum, and the ability to be frank.
Good operators deal with challenges all the time - that's how they raise capital from skeptical LPs, like me.
You can put them all to rest by directly answering Melanie's question. I'd like to know now too.

Thanks Scott!
I don鈥檛 owe any troll an explanation or proof about anything on my website. It鈥檚 a pretty small world, so you both can ask around and I鈥檓 confident you will hear great things about us.
I鈥檓 also challenging Melanie to prove her identity 馃槄 This is a random person with no info or profile pic, hiding behind their keyboard.
This is a little surprising that such trolls are allowed here on the forums. And they are allowed to spread misinformation. That鈥檚 why I asked for it to be deleted. It really hurts the quality and conversation of the group.
Thanks for checking out my website!