Real Estate Agent · Boston, MA · Member since 2016 · 106 posts · 69 votes
Hi BP,
I'm currently structuring a deal which I need to present to my seller tomorrow. Essentially, my seller is willing to do some owner financing in addition to the FHA loan. I will obviously disclose everything to the lender and make sure that my DTI still stands acceptable (and I have seen the HUD requirements to get a carry-back approved, and met them all).
My question is is there a difference on whether the seller financed note is secured or unsecured with regards to a possible refinance? What I mean is if I get the seller to take an unsecured note (with a better interest rate to compensate him on additional risk), will that debt be counted as part of the "loan" in an LTV assessment if I try to get the property refinanced in a year (essentially will that note amount become instant equity for me which I can play with?). Or will the unsecured note be treated the same as a secured note at second position lien and be counted as part of LTV when I go and try to refi the place?
And if the latter is the case, is there anything I can do to create a note that is not assessed as part of the debt for the property, but is rather stand-alone debt?
An unsecured note would not be tied to the property at all. Make sure you run your scenario by your lender, instead of just relying on your interpretation from HUD's web site.
Thanks @Wayne Brooks makes sense just wanted to check that. My lender is fully aware we are just finishing up final details now to make sure this all works. If this works, it will be a nice way to get quick equity to refi out of FHA and get rid of PMI