Tank Sweep Company Missed Oil Tank

Tank Sweep Company Missed Oil Tank

Flipper · South Orange, NJ · Member since 2017 · 14 posts · 7 votes

Hi Everyone,

I purchased a property to flip about a year ago.  Prior to purchase, as is customary in NJ, I had a tank sweep company come investigate the property.  They indicated that there were no oil tanks on the property.  Fast forward a year later, we get an offer and the new buyers find an oil tank as part of their pre-purchase inspection.  I was completely shocked given that I had paid to have some one to look for a tank.  Anyway, the tank sweep company said they don't do oil tank removal and to take matters up with their insurance.  The adjuster says over the phone that they do not think the tank sweep company should be responsible for any removal costs which could go into 5 figures.  Has anyone else had this problem?  How should this be handled?  Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

-Mike

1Reply
148 views

Most Popular Reply

Joe SplitrockPro Member
Moderator
Rental Property Investor · Sioux Falls, SD · Member since 2015 · 9k+ posts · 18k+ votes
8y

@Michael Lear I would pursue them for the full cost of removal due to gross negligence on their part. The only service they were contracted to provide to you is finding tanks. They did not perform the function. Other professionals can attest that had they done the scan, they would have found it. My guess is they were in a hurry and skipped the scan or they had a bad battery or some reason it didn't get picked up. Of course their adjuster is going to try to avoid responsibility. Get an attorney and have signed statements from the professionals.

Think of it another way. If I got in a car accident due to running a light by accident, would I be responsible for the damage that occurred? Mistakes have consequences, tell the weasel insurance adjuster that.

See this reply in the discussion

32 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Real Estate Consultant · Bloomfield, NJ · Member since 2010 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Michael Lear:

    Quality Tank, LLC

     Thanks. That doesn't sound familiar. You sure it wasn't qualified tank services?

  • Flipper · South Orange, NJ · Member since 2017 · 14 posts · 7 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Ibrahim Hughes:
    Originally posted by @Michael Lear:

    Quality Tank, LLC

     Thanks. That doesn't sound familiar. You sure it wasn't qualified tank services?

    Sorry, it's Quality Tank Scanning, LLC

  • Real Estate Consultant · Bloomfield, NJ · Member since 2010 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    8y

    ok Thanks Michael. Good luck with getting this resolved. The worst scenario I ever saw was $100,000 contamination Cleanup in Cranford. Had the whole front and side yard dug up with steel girders running through the basement. Fortunately Insurance took care of it. So $13,000 is considered relatively light. Especially if it hasn't yet hit the water table. It could have been a lot worse. Best bet is to probably go with companies that most investors around here use. Qualified is 1 and ATS environmental is another.

  • Flipper · South Orange, NJ · Member since 2017 · 14 posts · 7 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Ibrahim Hughes:

    ok Thanks Michael. Good luck with getting this resolved. The worst scenario I ever saw was $100,000 contamination Cleanup in Cranford. Had the whole front and side yard dug up with steel girders running through the basement. Fortunately Insurance took care of it. So $13,000 is considered relatively light. Especially if it hasn't yet hit the water table. It could have been a lot worse. Best bet is to probably go with companies that most investors around here use. Qualified is 1 and ATS environmental is another.

    Qualified Tank Scanning was recommended to me by someone I trusted. Was thinking of going with ATS at the time. My broker said he’s only dealt with this kind of thing once or twice in 21 years. The property was tiny. Missing a tank on like a .15 acre lot is just unfathomable. It should never happen. This has to be the worst case for this size of house and property.

  • Engineer · Portland, OR · Member since 2014 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    8y
    @Michael Lear if it was decommissioned and showed a subsequent liakne then it should be indemnified by whoever was paid to decommission it
  • Engineer · Portland, OR · Member since 2014 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    8y
    *Subsequent leak
  • Flipper/Rehabber · 07728 · Member since 2018 · 7 posts · 0 votes
    4y

    Michael Lear.  I am just following up on this post. Did the insurance eventually pay?

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.