Has anyone ever used the Velocity Banking Strategy?

Has anyone ever used the Velocity Banking Strategy?

Don SpaffordPro Member
Investor · Idaho Falls, ID · Member since 2016 · 912 posts · 629 votes

I searched for Velocity Banking but did not get anything to return except for some lenders using that name. I just was introduced to this strategy this week and was curious if anyone has done it and what their experience with it was.

If yuo don't know, the basic concept is to use a line of credit from the bank and use it like a checking account so you put yout income into it but get a LOC for like $10k, add in your income for that month, and use the $10k to pay the principal, and then pay your other expenses from that account and as long as you are spending less than what is going in, you build that LOC back up again so you are able to pay back the $10k LOC and then use it again to pay toward the principal. So if you save $1k each month, then every 10 months you can use it again or get an increased LOC and use a larger amount. Doing this strategy gets a 30 yr loan paid off in about 7 years and saved tons of interest. The LOC calculates interest on an average daily balance, so as you have money going into it each month, you are creating less of an amount to charge interest for. So over the course of a year, for that $10k LOC, assuming $4k income and $3k expenses, for a $250k mortgage at 5.25%, you pay about $13k in interest on the mortgage payments (first year of mortgage) vs only a few hundred dollars on the LOC.

The only down-side I can see is opportunity cost. That money that you are saving each month could be deployed to purchase other properties rather than helping to pay off any specific loan. But if you have enough other sources of income and strictly use the rental income for any given property to put back into its own LOC, then theoretically, you can have full 100% cash flowing properties in 7-8 years, depending on how much you are saving each month. You could even use it for your primary residence.

I just bought my first 4 plex this week, literally closed the same day I was shown this strategy, and it blew my mind. I want to use it with this property since it will be cash flowing about $700/mo and if I can get it paid off much sooner and save a lot of money in interest, that would be awesome.

10Reply
2,494 views

Most Popular Reply

Rental Property Investor · Pasadena, CA · Member since 2016 · 164 posts · 149 votes
9y

What you have to remember with this Velocity banking stuff is that it really isn't this golden goose brilliant idea that some people make it out to be. If it was, everyone would be doing it. It's also the reason why smart people can't understand what is so "brilliant" about it, because it isn't brilliant or that helpful. People advertise it as a way to pay off a mortgage in 7 years etc blah blah blah it all sounds good to the ill informed or financial illiterate, but in all honesty, you could actually do that with any mortgage you want, you just have to be disciplined. The Velocity banking is more of a way to force you to diligently pay something off quickly. Another trick they like to talk about is how much interest it saves you, they typically show you how much interest you would pay over 30 years on a mortgage and take that entire interest amount as a % of the loan or house value, which is not a true % interest you are paying lol. And of course if you pay off a house in 7 years, you "save" a lot in interest, but you can do the same by paying off a mortgage in 7 years conventionally (albeit you would still pay a little more interest). This Velocity banking is more like one of those credit card hacking people where they have a slightly better rewards package on their credit card, sure they make a few bucks more, but the effort and time it takes to do it is not worth it to some people. Yes the method is probably slightly better than just using a conventional way of paying, but it's not absurdly better or genius. This is why it's so hard to try and understand why it's so much better, it's just not. Trust me, I'm a CPA and work in corporate finance and  I've sat through a demonstration on this.

You make a very good point about opportunity cost with the HELOC and it's a huge detractor from this method. Why would you seriously care to pay down a 4-5% mortgage quickly if you are an investor and can earn 8-20% on your money. I posed this same question to the person on stage in a 40 person presentation on Velocity method and the presenter gave some ridiculous response that didn't make any sense.

I'm not saying this is necessarily a bad idea or a scam, but rather not some crazy good thing. The benefit from a HELOC is that it allows you to front the payment for a month, which lowers the average amount you owe on your loan throughout the month, and thus the interest you pay is lower, whereas if you didn't have the HELOC, you would have to wait a month to see that decrease in interest. They then say to take that interest savings and put it against your mortgage again and keep doing that and you have it paid off in 7 years. Ok sure, why would I want to do that if my mortgage rate is 4.2% lol, why not take that savings and invest it. They target peoples emotions "pay off your mortgage in 7 years WOW!!!" when in reality it's probably not the smartest financial advice.

See this reply in the discussion

356 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Brian CardwellPro Member
    Investor · Odenton, MD · Member since 2017 · 204 posts · 144 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Joe Splitrock:
    Originally posted by @Brian Cardwell:
    Originally posted by @Shiloh Lundahl:

    @Brian Cardwell I just looked at your explaination and I appreciate you taking the time to write it out, but I didn't see any of the 10k going towards interest. Also, it looked like there was 2k a month extra. Couldn't you have just applied that towards the principle and have gotten the same effect without needing to use the HELOC?

    The 10k doesn't go to the interest. It goes towards the principle. The 2k represents the amount of money left over for the month. That money stays in the HELOC.

    Direct answer to your question is "yes". You could have done that. Here is why I didn't. I didn't because I wanted to still have access to that 2k if I needed it. By using the heloc it allowed me to still have access to that 2k each month.

    There will be those who say it doesn't make sense to do that. It did/does make sense to me and my mortgage was paid off in less than 7years. I also now have a line of credit to pull from if I want. Plus my credit score benefited from it too. 

    You could have just opened paid $2K extra to your mortgage every month and kept a revolving credit account open for emergencies, whether that be HELOC or credit card. Ultimately the HELOC isn't needed to pay off a mortgage faster. It is the extra principal payments that pay off the mortgage. Your HELOC and mortgage interest works out the same, assuming similar interest rate. I understand for you the HELOC made it easier, but it is not necessary and doesn't result in any faster pay off than just writing an extra principal check each month.

    @Joe Splitrock

    I am not going to go down this rabbit hole with you again. I don't believe anyone has said that anyone HAS to use a HELOC to do this, but it absolutely made it more comfortable for ME and a minimal cost. Heloc or another LOC it doesn't matter.

  • Investor · Cincinnati, OH · Member since 2012 · 506 posts · 331 votes
    8y

    Has anyone addressed the fact that HELOC interest is no longer tax deductible?

  • Investor · Midlothian, VA · Member since 2015 · 980 posts · 823 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Sean Cole:

    Has anyone addressed the fact that HELOC interest is no longer tax deductible?

    I believe it is still tax deductible up to $100k depending on what you use it for. 

  • Brian CardwellPro Member
    Investor · Odenton, MD · Member since 2017 · 204 posts · 144 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Edward B.:
    Originally posted by @Don Spafford:

    From what I have understood about, it is that it moves your amortization schedule way ahead each time you make the large LOC payment so that each consecutive normal monthly payment is then automatically paying more toward principle rather than interest. By simply paying more each month, you do not get as large of an effect on this. the further ahead in your amortization you get, the larger percentage of your payment goes toward principle. So if you pay an extra $500/mo in your payment toward principle, over a year you maybe get 2-3 payments ahead. But by making a large payment of $10k, it jumps you YEARS ahead in your payment schedule which is why you then are able to pay it off this way in 7-10 years and the extra minimal interest you pay on the LOC is negligible for the overall savings you get from it. I admit, it is not for everybody and if it doesn't make sense to you then you should maybe stay away or do more research to understand it better. Mathematically, it makes sense. As others have said, you could possibly get better use from the money to invest in other properties, so you have to do your own due diligence and decide what is best for you.

    The issue is that you are transferring the interest that you would have been paying to the 1st mortgage on that $10k to paying interest on the HELOC for that $10k. It may be negligible depending on your HELOC terms, but it is almost certainly more than just applying those payments to the 1st mortgage in the first place without the more expensive HELOC. The question then becomes do you want to pay for the right to access that money again. I believe the general consensus is that this is mostly a psychological strategy that allows you to justify paying your mortgage down much faster than you otherwise would have, but it will cost you more.

     I actually agree that it is somewhat psychological but if it helps one get out of debt, then I am for it.

  • Investor · Midlothian, VA · Member since 2015 · 980 posts · 823 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Brian Cardwell:
    Originally posted by @Edward B.:
    Originally posted by @Don Spafford:

    From what I have understood about, it is that it moves your amortization schedule way ahead each time you make the large LOC payment so that each consecutive normal monthly payment is then automatically paying more toward principle rather than interest. By simply paying more each month, you do not get as large of an effect on this. the further ahead in your amortization you get, the larger percentage of your payment goes toward principle. So if you pay an extra $500/mo in your payment toward principle, over a year you maybe get 2-3 payments ahead. But by making a large payment of $10k, it jumps you YEARS ahead in your payment schedule which is why you then are able to pay it off this way in 7-10 years and the extra minimal interest you pay on the LOC is negligible for the overall savings you get from it. I admit, it is not for everybody and if it doesn't make sense to you then you should maybe stay away or do more research to understand it better. Mathematically, it makes sense. As others have said, you could possibly get better use from the money to invest in other properties, so you have to do your own due diligence and decide what is best for you.

    The issue is that you are transferring the interest that you would have been paying to the 1st mortgage on that $10k to paying interest on the HELOC for that $10k. It may be negligible depending on your HELOC terms, but it is almost certainly more than just applying those payments to the 1st mortgage in the first place without the more expensive HELOC. The question then becomes do you want to pay for the right to access that money again. I believe the general consensus is that this is mostly a psychological strategy that allows you to justify paying your mortgage down much faster than you otherwise would have, but it will cost you more.

     I actually agree that it is somewhat psychological but if it helps one get out of debt, then I am for it.

    For sure, especially if your goal is to payoff your mortgage. I just don't happen to agree with paying off your mortgage. 

    Thereare lots of different ways to play this game and the great thing about it is that we can all play by or own rules and do just fine. But don't play by someone else's rules if you don't fully understand the game they are playing.

  • Investor · Cincinnati, OH · Member since 2012 · 506 posts · 331 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Edward B.:
    Originally posted by @Sean Cole:

    Has anyone addressed the fact that HELOC interest is no longer tax deductible?

    I believe it is still tax deductible up to $100k depending on what you use it for. 

     Nope.  That was 2017.

    You'd have to show you used the money to make substantial improvements to your home AND be under a total of $750k between your 1st and HELOC.

  • Brian CardwellPro Member
    Investor · Odenton, MD · Member since 2017 · 204 posts · 144 votes
    8y

    Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, enacted Dec. 22, suspends from 2018 until 2026 the deduction for interest paid on home equity loans and lines of credit, unless they are used to buy, build or substantially improve the taxpayer’s home that secures the loan.

    So yes you can still take it as a deduction as long as it qualifies. So as the rule is written one could use a HELOC in the first position because you are using it to purchase your home. One can also use a HELOC in to pay down their first mortgage because it is being used to purchase your house.

  • Shiloh LundahlPro Member
    Rental Property Investor · Gilbert, AZ · Member since 2016 · 3k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    8y

    So after reading more about the explaination of the velocity of money. And after going to a presentation on it the other day, it doesn’t seem as awesome as it appeared to me at first. 

    Basically it is putting an extra 2k on the house payment a month. I think that this strategy is great if the goal is the get out of debt, however, if my goal is the build my portfolio and create cash flow, then a better plan for me might be to learn how to manage debt and leverage debt by learning to access more private money or lines of credit to purchase more properties that create more cash flow. Over time my tenants can pay off my debt and I still own the property. Also, I am less of a target for law suites when I have my properties leveraged then when I have them paid off.

    Let me know if my thinking is off somewhere.

  • Brian CardwellPro Member
    Investor · Odenton, MD · Member since 2017 · 204 posts · 144 votes
    8y

    Sounds spot on dude

  • Investor · Princeton, TX · Member since 2014 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    8y

    All this talk about paying off your home mortgage might distract people from what they should do first.  This should not even be considered unless they have ZERO higher interest debt and a reserve fund for emergencies.

    Home mortgage debt is one of the cheapest kinds you can have.

  • Chicago, IL · Member since 2018 · 8 posts · 0 votes
    8y

    doesn't this only work if the LOC or HELOC is a rate lower than the other debt that you are paying off?

  • Investor · Cincinnati, OH · Member since 2012 · 506 posts · 331 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Brian Cardwell:

    One can also use a HELOC in to pay down their first mortgage because it is being used to purchase your house.

     That's interesting logic, but I think it's clearly outside the bounds of the Act.  Paying down a mortgage isn't the same as purchasing the house.  By your logic, a principal payment on the mortgage would always be tax deductible and it's clearly not.

  • Boston, MA · Member since 2018 · 1 post · 3 votes
    8y

    I was surprised how many people posting here don't understand this strategy. The best way to understand velocity banking is to create a spreadsheet and build your own mortgage amortization table. Then you plug in the extra payments from either HELOC or personal line of credit. Meanwhile, build another table to calculate how much interest you're paying by using the line of credit. You need to truly understand the concept of APR first before doing so. Simple cost and benefit analysis.

    However, there are things to watch out here. First, you need to have a positive cash flow. Say your paycheck is 10k you can't spend 15k per month.  Second, you need to be good with number and understand credit. Someone needs to manage both the mortgage and the line of credit, not to mention other credit cards and bank accounts. 

    Remember, positive cash flow is the king.

  • Member since 2018 · 7 posts · 12 votes
    8y

    It sounds like you're trying to lower the effective rate because you put a whole paycheck into the loc n pay for the mortgage.  Then you pay bills with the loc, but because you're spreading them out over the month your only spending interest for the average of how long they've been in there. The faster you pay them off the lower the effective rate and the slower the higher.  Which is why it doesn't make sense to me to put 10k in at a time when it takes a year to pay off as youre paying the full interest rate. 

  • Investor · Stilwell, KS · Member since 2015 · 7 posts · 1 vote
    8y

    I do something similar except I use credit cards for 3 percent transfer fee, 18 months zero interest.  I borrow whatever amount I can safely pay back in 18 months and throw it at the mortgage to save on interest.  I saved over 6000 in interest on 30k student loan debt.  

  • Member since 2018 · 3 posts · 1 vote
    8y

    I am a Kellogg Northwestern grad and we learned a similar technique in business school...  My mom recently wanted to increase her income and have a house paid off for every grandchild she has so it turns out that velocity banking was the right tool for her... 

    Now to respond to some negative comments I have seen posted on velocity banking... I think the one item that the people who are negative about velocity banking are missing a key point... First of all it is just a tool and shouldn't be viewed as "negative" as it is a just a tool... The difference between between conventional mortgages and lines of credit are that the bank has a long guaranteed cash flow from your conventional loan while your payments on your HELOC reduce the banks cash flow every time your pay it down... When I run companies,we work off "revolvers" or basically lines of credit.... so if the "conventional" mortgage was such a great debt instrument,why do you think the smartest folks in business don't use them?  

    The one really good point that was brought up in a "negative" response was that paying off you mortgage in that short of time could have lost opportunity cost... Good Point... I helped my mother work through the calculations and it turns out that she is better off right now buying the next cash flow property which she is netting about $400 to $500 in positive cash flow on her current deal profile... her payoff is only adds about $351 on her best property due to very low interest payments... best of luck and they are very effective tools to learn for specific use... As they say its not either/or one versus the other... "and" is better and you can mix the loans as appropriate for best results... until her cash flow property opportunity drops below $351 then she will continue purchase rather than pay down existing... best of luck and she 5 properties to date... Go Mom! love the community her and we did sign up for PRO... Thanks BiggerPockets

  • Investor · Boston, MA · Member since 2015 · 1k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    8y

    @Rich Weatherford what rates on their revolvers are the companies you run getting? 

    Also for purposes of this discussion, paying off long term debt, bonds and mortgages are essentially the same thing.

  • Member since 2018 · 3 posts · 1 vote
    8y

    I was under NDA and an officer of the company for the private family when I was working for as COO at Arrowhead Products as well Crane electronics so I can't discuss... I can tell you about the LOC we're currently in negotiations with a community bank... It looks like variable prime plus one depending on how much we take right away... I'm open to other sources... I would even consider a little higher rate to avoid the bureaucracy of the bank and have better flexibility...

  • Rental Property Investor · San Francisco, CA · Member since 2016 · 215 posts · 42 votes
    8y

    I'm still trying to wrap my head around all this but I think the salient points are these:

    1. Total debt still remains the same regardless if you use the HELOC or not; this strategy is essentially moving money around from one loan to another and doesn't "magically" pay off one's loan more quickly; the reason why folks are commenting that their loan was paid off in X years is because they made additional principal payments

    2. The strategy of simply paying off your first loan principal directly (without HELOC) should achieve the same result; however, with this strategy, you run the risk of having less cash on hand. If that's an issue, one can simply pull from the HELOC when he/she NEEDS the cash

    To sum up, the only benefit to using the HELOC and applying it towards velocity banking, is that your entire cash balance is constantly working towards paying down principal (and thus, total interest). This would have the exact same effect if you paid down principal early each month with all your cash (but with this method, you run the risk of not having cash on hand when needed to pay bills, etc.)

  • Rental Property Investor · San Francisco, CA · Member since 2016 · 215 posts · 42 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Scott L.:

    Let's say your mortgages are calculated monthly and HELOCS are compounded daily. Fine, its really a small point with daily or monthly compounding. If you run a calculator as if you're the bank, you'll find it makes a couple percent difference in the total interest paid (received by the bank) over the course of the loan. If you pay $3000 on your first lien HELOC on the first, then borrow back $1500 of it to pay your bills on the 15th. You save 15 days of interest on $1500 at say 5%...So you save $3.12. If you do it every month for 30 years it saves you $1125 over the 30 years. Not even a full payment. So this helps you pay it off in 7 years how?

    The only difference with a regular mortgage is you can't "borrow back" an advance payment of principal to pay your bills later in the month. And on the "monthly" vs. daily calculation, ask your bank when they credit an early principal payment for the calculation of interest...On the date it's received....or at the end of the month it's received? Even if they waited it's still only a difference of the interest on that payment for one month. So a couple dollars. There was a long thread on this method a couple years ago. Someone finally did a "daily cash flow" spreadsheet with assumptions described in these plans for a 30 year mortgage payoff.  The result was it paid off a month or two early assuming no additional early principal payments. The monthly/daily interest calculation and amortization differences are negligible. There are two ways to pay off a loan faster. Get a lower interest rate. Pay more principal sooner. 

    I paid of my 200,000 7% mortgage originated in 1998 in two years. How? By paying extra principal instead of investing it in Internet stocks like my colleagues. They laughed at my 7% return, until they didn't...

    Hey Scott,

    One important point that your math omitted: you need to compound the interest on the "savings " that you noted in your first paragraph. In your example, the savings would be much greater than $3.12 bc that would be compounded over the life of the loan (e.g. 10, 20, or even 30 more years).

    A simple way to think about it: if I have a 10 year loan for $1000 that I take out today and tomorrow, pay it off completely while it only accrues $1 in interest, my "savings" is much more than that $1. I wouldn't tell my friends that I "saved" $1 by paying off my loan early. I've effectively "saved" on all interest payments on the $1000 principal for the next 10 years.

    To be clear, I'm not advocating for velocity banking and like many of you, I'm just starting to research & understand the topic before deciding if it's the right thing for me. It does look like it has some merits, although folks need to understand that it's not doing anything special (i.e. direct principal pay down with all your monthly cash surplus would do the exact same thing, and perhaps even better bc you wouldn't be paying interest on the HELOC). I'm actually nervous at all the advocates here who are posting it as "it just works" without being able to articulate the math and mechanics behind the strategy.

  • Investor · Flower Mound, TX · Member since 2017 · 182 posts · 198 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Cliff T.:
    Originally posted by @Scott L.:

    Let's say your mortgages are calculated monthly and HELOCS are compounded daily. Fine, its really a small point with daily or monthly compounding. If you run a calculator as if you're the bank, you'll find it makes a couple percent difference in the total interest paid (received by the bank) over the course of the loan. If you pay $3000 on your first lien HELOC on the first, then borrow back $1500 of it to pay your bills on the 15th. You save 15 days of interest on $1500 at say 5%...So you save $3.12. If you do it every month for 30 years it saves you $1125 over the 30 years. Not even a full payment. So this helps you pay it off in 7 years how?

    The only difference with a regular mortgage is you can't "borrow back" an advance payment of principal to pay your bills later in the month. And on the "monthly" vs. daily calculation, ask your bank when they credit an early principal payment for the calculation of interest...On the date it's received....or at the end of the month it's received? Even if they waited it's still only a difference of the interest on that payment for one month. So a couple dollars. There was a long thread on this method a couple years ago. Someone finally did a "daily cash flow" spreadsheet with assumptions described in these plans for a 30 year mortgage payoff.  The result was it paid off a month or two early assuming no additional early principal payments. The monthly/daily interest calculation and amortization differences are negligible. There are two ways to pay off a loan faster. Get a lower interest rate. Pay more principal sooner. 

    I paid of my 200,000 7% mortgage originated in 1998 in two years. How? By paying extra principal instead of investing it in Internet stocks like my colleagues. They laughed at my 7% return, until they didn't...

    Hey Scott,

    One important point that your math omitted: you need to compound the interest on the "savings " that you noted in your first paragraph. In your example, the savings would be much greater than $3.12 bc that would be compounded over the life of the loan (e.g. 10, 20, or even 30 more years).

    A simple way to think about it: if I have a 10 year loan for $1000 that I take out today and tomorrow, pay it off completely while it only accrues $1 in interest, my "savings" is much more than that $1. I've effectively "saved" on all interest payments on the $1000 principal for the next 10 years.

    My mistake was saying compounded instead of calculated. All standard mortgages are simple interest and they apply principal payments the day they are received. They calculate interest daily on the outstanding balance same as a HELOC. They just have required fixed payments, and you can't borrow back the money that you paid in early.

    The difference between a HELOC and a mortgage at the same interest rate is negligible. There is ONE way to pay off a loan faster. Pay the principal sooner. That's it. Which begs the question of where you get the money to pay the principal faster. Perhaps the HELOC strategy helps you psychologically to manage your money better. So you spend less money and pay more towards principal every month. Great but that isn't magic, just math. :-)

  • Brian CardwellPro Member
    Investor · Odenton, MD · Member since 2017 · 204 posts · 144 votes
    8y

    The fact of paying more towards your principle to payoff ones loan early is accurate. The question here is how are you going to do it? Are you going to use your own cash or OPM. I choose to use OPM. Why? So I didnt have to dip into my cash reserves. Also so I could use the extra money I had during the month to pay towards the principle and still have access to it. It's not magic, it's math. 

  • Rental Property Investor · Round Rock, TX · Member since 2016 · 1k+ posts · 971 votes
    8y

    @Scott L. There is a difference between a standard mortgage and HELOC - The standard mortgage in the US accrues interest monthly, meaning that the amount due the lender is calculated a month at a time. There are some rare mortgages, however, on which interest accrues daily.

    Interest on a HELOC is calculated daily rather than monthly, and that can make a substantial difference if used properly (you place all your incoming deposits in the HELOC).

  • Investor · Flower Mound, TX · Member since 2017 · 182 posts · 198 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Costin I.:

    @Scott L. There is a difference between a standard mortgage and HELOC - The standard mortgage in the US accrues interest monthly, meaning that the amount due the lender is calculated a month at a time. There are some rare mortgages, however, on which interest accrues daily.

    Interest on a HELOC is calculated daily rather than monthly, and that can make a substantial difference if used properly (you place all your incoming deposits in the HELOC).

    This is a common misunderstanding. If you send additional payment to a standard mortgage the balance for calculating interest is updated the day the payment is cleared.

  • Rental Property Investor · Round Rock, TX · Member since 2016 · 1k+ posts · 971 votes
    8y

    @Scott L., when is the interest recalculated? The day you make that additional payment or at the end of the month?

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.