The statements were accurate. The owner was still surprised.
An owner sees strong occupancy and higher rents throughout the year, then gets to December wondering why the property produced less money than expected.
The manager investigates. Collections are generally good, there haven’t been unusual vacancies, and accounting confirms the statements are correct. Eventually, the explanation emerges: insurance increased, contractor rates went up, and several turnovers required more work than anticipated.
Nothing dramatic happened, but the combined cost was enough to change the year’s result.
This is a fictional situation I explore in my latest podcast episode, and the most interesting moment comes when the manager calls the owner with her findings.
His response is: “I know expenses went up. What I don’t understand is why nobody told me this was becoming a pattern.”
He had received every statement. The information was there, but he’d taken steady occupancy and higher rents as signs that the building was having a strong year. Meanwhile, the team had been handling each expense as it came through, without stepping back to discuss what those increases meant together.
I think that’s where year-end reviews can become uncomfortable. A monthly statement can be accurate without making a gradual change particularly easy to recognize. One unusually expensive month might be temporary. Several months of rising costs could mean next year’s budget needs a different starting point.
Of course, calling an owner about every invoice wouldn’t help either. The challenge is recognizing when individual changes have become a financial trend worth discussing.
For owners and managers, what usually triggers that conversation? Do you use a budget variance threshold, watch for changes over several months, or handle it another way?