New to Real Estate · Lansdale, PA · Member since 2025 · 34 posts · 15 votes
For those operating short-term rentals in their personal name:
• Are you using homeowner or landlord insurance with an STR rider, or
• A dedicated STR policy (e.g., Proper or similar)?
For those using homeowner + landlord + umbrella:
• Do you feel this combination adequately covers STR-specific risks?
• Are there any risks you’re knowingly accepting or self-insuring?
I’m hoping to learn from real-world setups and the considerations behind them.
If you’re willing to share, I’d appreciate details on:
Whether your umbrella policy explicitly allows STR activity
Any claims filed, and how the experience (including renewal) went
• If you considered a dedicated STR policy but decided against it, what factors drove that decision?
• Would you keep the same insurance setup if you added a second STR?
Thanks in advance—trying to understand the trade-offs before finalizing a decision.
Property Manager · Gatlinburg, TN · Member since 2020 · 3k+ posts · 4k+ votes
8mo
I'm not going to address every bullet point, but I lost a cabin to a fire back in 2016.
Here is what I learned: You are probably underinsured. If your property is destroyed by a natural disaster, that means a lot of other folks' properties were destroyed, too. That means the cost of rebuilding jumps 50 percent overnight, because there are too few builders and hundreds of people looking to hire them. And the cost never seems to come back to earth, no matter how long you wait.
My rebuild cost was about 50 percent more than I was insured for, which translated into huge out of pocket for me to get it rebuilt. But it was either that or sell my empty lot and walk away.
As for liability claims...we did have one on a property that we manage - a slip and fall with broken leg (highly suspicious, but didn't seem to matter). They sued for $1 million. Eventually the case was settled for $250K. The homeowner's STR policy paid half ($125K), and my management company's insurance paid the other half.
Property Manager · Gatlinburg, TN · Member since 2020 · 3k+ posts · 4k+ votes
8mo
I'm not going to address every bullet point, but I lost a cabin to a fire back in 2016.
Here is what I learned: You are probably underinsured. If your property is destroyed by a natural disaster, that means a lot of other folks' properties were destroyed, too. That means the cost of rebuilding jumps 50 percent overnight, because there are too few builders and hundreds of people looking to hire them. And the cost never seems to come back to earth, no matter how long you wait.
My rebuild cost was about 50 percent more than I was insured for, which translated into huge out of pocket for me to get it rebuilt. But it was either that or sell my empty lot and walk away.
As for liability claims...we did have one on a property that we manage - a slip and fall with broken leg (highly suspicious, but didn't seem to matter). They sued for $1 million. Eventually the case was settled for $250K. The homeowner's STR policy paid half ($125K), and my management company's insurance paid the other half.
For those operating short-term rentals in their personal name:
• Are you using homeowner or landlord insurance with an STR rider, or
• A dedicated STR policy (e.g., Proper or similar)?
For those using homeowner + landlord + umbrella:
• Do you feel this combination adequately covers STR-specific risks?
• Are there any risks you’re knowingly accepting or self-insuring?
I’m hoping to learn from real-world setups and the considerations behind them.
If you’re willing to share, I’d appreciate details on:
Whether your umbrella policy explicitly allows STR activity
Any claims filed, and how the experience (including renewal) went
• If you considered a dedicated STR policy but decided against it, what factors drove that decision?
• Would you keep the same insurance setup if you added a second STR?
Thanks in advance—trying to understand the trade-offs before finalizing a decision.
You can only use homeowners insurance with an STR rider if you actually use the home and only occasionally rent it out. If it's a full-time STR you need actual insurance for that risk.
Specialist · Strongsville, OH · Member since 2016 · 303 posts · 217 votes
8mo
Only a dedicated STR or STR endorsed policy will cover your property. A normal homeowners policy will deny any/all claims once they find out you are using the property for STR or Landlord.
Tampa, FL · Member since 2022 · 3k+ posts · 3k+ votes
8mo
My wife is an insurance agent - you want to have dedicated STR policies. You also want to err on the side of caution and increase coverage a bit generally the cost estimator usually is decent. I use about $200/ft cost to rebuild. I also use an umbrella to cover additional liability.
My wife is an insurance agent - you want to have dedicated STR policies. You also want to err on the side of caution and increase coverage a bit generally the cost estimator usually is decent. I use about $200/ft cost to rebuild. I also use an umbrella to cover additional liability.
Does she advertise here? I'm guessing she is someone who would be helpful to us since she knows the biz.
My wife is an insurance agent - you want to have dedicated STR policies. You also want to err on the side of caution and increase coverage a bit generally the cost estimator usually is decent. I use about $200/ft cost to rebuild. I also use an umbrella to cover additional liability.
Does she advertise here? I'm guessing she is someone who would be helpful to us since she knows the biz.
Not yet, she is still training she is fairly new but is focusing on being an expert in STR for FL
Saint Paul, MN · Member since 2015 · 51 posts · 33 votes
4mo
I think one of the most important concepts in these discussions is distinguishing between:
a policy technically permitting STR activity and
a policy specifically underwritten for STR operations
Those are not always the same thing.
A lot of the real-world differences only become visible during:
claims handling
business interruption disputes
guest injury litigation
amenity-related incidents
reconstruction after regional disasters
I also think Collin’s point about rebuild cost inflation is extremely important and still underappreciated by many operators. Replacement-cost assumptions that looked reasonable several years ago may be materially inadequate today, especially in markets with:
labor shortages
catastrophe exposure
rapid construction inflation
ordinance/code upgrades
From a risk-management standpoint, I think the key question is less: “What is the cheapest acceptable structure?”
and more: “What exposures am I intentionally retaining, and am I financially comfortable retaining them?”
For some operators, retaining certain risks is perfectly rational. But I think it’s important those decisions are made consciously rather than assuming:
OTA protections
umbrella policies
or permissive standard policies
all function identically to dedicated STR underwriting.