Investor · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2008 · 17k+ posts · 17k+ votes
15y
I'm not a HML, but I can't imagine any HML would have an issue with you borrowing LESS money than what's needed for the purchase + rehab, especially if they're still secured in first position by the property.
Investor · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2008 · 17k+ posts · 17k+ votes
15y
Originally posted by Philip Bourdon:
I would think so too, since my credit is in the process of being "rehabbed!"
Hard money lenders (just like all lenders) like good credit, but if an HML can loan out against a property where there is a LOT of equity, it really doesn't matter the borrower's credit, as the lender can easily take back the property and resell for a profit if necessary.
Most lenders don't want to do this, but again, if there's enough equity that it would be *EASY* to sell for a profit, I can't imagine most would have any issues.
Is it true that with REO's one's "position" is improved if it's a straight cash deal and no loans?
Absolutely. Banks love contracts with no contingencies, and the financing contingency is a big one that banks are happy not to have to deal with...