REQUIRE New Tenant Get RENTAL INSURANCE?

REQUIRE New Tenant Get RENTAL INSURANCE?

Member since 2020 · 36 posts · 5 votes

Property location = Sherman, TX.  It is a simple tiny house 1Bed,1Bath.  It has been over 6 years since I have had a NEW tenant.    I noticed that my last tenant had a renters insurance policy (without me mandating).  In 2026 is it normal to REQUIRE this from tenants?  What are Pros/Cons?  Grateful for advice!

1Reply
585 views

Most Popular Reply

Honolulu, HI · Member since 2008 · 3k+ posts · 2k+ votes
2mo

Reality is, yes, of course it is a "good idea" to require, BUT, can your C and D class property tenants afford it? Especially if they are on subsidized housing? What are their total monthly obligations? 

For A and B class property, not very many will push back on the requirement. "Tracking" is a non-issue. You require they name you/your company as "additional insured" or "additional interest" (this varies depending on the insurance company). Some insurance companies charge a fee to the tenant for this, others do not. Either way, YOU will get a written (regular mail) Notice from the carrier of cancellation and effective date (typically around 10 days in advance). You then need to send your own "Notice of Violation" to the tenant for breaching their Rental Terms.

Once the tenant makes the payment for the coverage, a rescission notice will be sent by the carrier, re-instating the coverage, possibly with a gap in coverage dates. As long as you check your own mail regularly, there is nothing you really need to do. If you are OCD, you can set up a reminder based on the stated term of the initial coverage certificate, or enter it into your database and generate a monthly report of "end" dates. But our office handled several thousand COA/HOA units in addition to well over a hundred rentals, and never had an insurance loss due to no coverage where it was required (COA/HOA projects typically require owners to carry HO6 coverage that meshes with the "master" project policy for proper coverage).

See this reply in the discussion

14 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Member since 2022 · 2 posts · 1 vote
    3mo

    Yes, I always request renters insurance at the beginning and renewals because some will stop paying during the lease period. Its best to have it.

  • Investor · Las Vegas, NV · Member since 2013 · 8k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    3mo

    It can’t hurt but sometimes won’t help a much as you think. It often only covers the tenant’s stuff in case it’s damaged/stolen. Even when it’s supposed to cover damage they cause you are sometimes disappointed.  

    I had a tenant start the tub fill and then fall asleep flooding the upstairs. They have USAA insurance which I’ve only heard good things about. They filed a claim and heard nothing. So they filed another claim and we called to confirm, they had a valid policy. The response? Oh yeah, they have a policy but we don’t cover water damage… Huh? Probably the most common kind of tenant damage ain’t covered?

    Anyway, they did send a $1,000 “look we’re good guys” payment but still had to file under my own insurance to get it rebuilt. 

  • Real Estate Broker · Northeast PA · Member since 2017 · 2k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    3mo

    For our management practice, there is no lease signing without renter's insurance.  We get named on the policy, so if it lapses we get notified.

    Had a tenant-caused kitchen fire that did about $15k in damages.  Our insurance carrier collected from the renter's policy, and didn't raise our premium.

    I believe renter's insurance is well worth it for all concerned.

  • Real Estate Agent · Memphis · Member since 2026 · 619 posts · 356 votes
    3mo

    We generally see renters insurance as a good requirement, especially because the owner's policy typically isn't there to cover a resident's personal belongings. It also helps make expectations clearer before move-in rather than after something happens. 

    The key is making the requirement part of the lease and having a process to verify coverage and renewals. Since requirements can vary by location, I'd also make sure the lease language lines up with Texas and any local rules. 

  • Investor · San Diego · Member since 2020 · 97 posts · 62 votes
    3mo

    @Kevin Turano - Margaret's absolutely right. I'd add: It's become way more common in the last few years, and enforceability varies by state. Texas generally allows you to require it in the lease, though it's not mandatory. Pros are solid: the tenant is financially responsible if they damage the place, and you're not the one they call for every broken lamp. Con: some tenants resist the upfront $15-20/month cost, especially if they're already tight on money. I've found requesting it (rather than demanding) at lease time gets better compliance, you can frame it as "this protects you from liability too." Have you thought about whether you'll enforce it if a new tenant refuses?

  • Owen RosenBusiness Member
    Professional · Clinton Township, MI · Member since 2015 · 709 posts · 267 votes
    2mo
    Quote from @Kevin Turano:

    Property location = Sherman, TX.  It is a simple tiny house 1Bed,1Bath.  It has been over 6 years since I have had a NEW tenant.    I noticed that my last tenant had a renters insurance policy (without me mandating).  In 2026 is it normal to REQUIRE this from tenants?  What are Pros/Cons?  Grateful for advice!


     If a tenant refuses to get renters insurance for their property - do you really think they'll take good care of your property?

    Royal Oath Insurance Group4.9211 Reviews
  • Honolulu, HI · Member since 2008 · 3k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    2mo

    Reality is, yes, of course it is a "good idea" to require, BUT, can your C and D class property tenants afford it? Especially if they are on subsidized housing? What are their total monthly obligations? 

    For A and B class property, not very many will push back on the requirement. "Tracking" is a non-issue. You require they name you/your company as "additional insured" or "additional interest" (this varies depending on the insurance company). Some insurance companies charge a fee to the tenant for this, others do not. Either way, YOU will get a written (regular mail) Notice from the carrier of cancellation and effective date (typically around 10 days in advance). You then need to send your own "Notice of Violation" to the tenant for breaching their Rental Terms.

    Once the tenant makes the payment for the coverage, a rescission notice will be sent by the carrier, re-instating the coverage, possibly with a gap in coverage dates. As long as you check your own mail regularly, there is nothing you really need to do. If you are OCD, you can set up a reminder based on the stated term of the initial coverage certificate, or enter it into your database and generate a monthly report of "end" dates. But our office handled several thousand COA/HOA units in addition to well over a hundred rentals, and never had an insurance loss due to no coverage where it was required (COA/HOA projects typically require owners to carry HO6 coverage that meshes with the "master" project policy for proper coverage).

  • Mike FisherBusiness Member
    New Lenox, IL · Member since 2024 · 141 posts · 72 votes
    2mo

    Good question, and the fact your last tenant carried it on their own tells you it is normal now. I have managed Chicago-area rentals since 1991, so a few specifics the usual pro and con list skips:

    Require the liability portion, not just "a policy." The real value to you is not their personal property coverage, it is the tenant liability limit that responds when they cause the loss (the tub-overflow and kitchen-fire examples above). Put a minimum personal liability figure in the lease, something like 100k, so you are not relying on whatever bare policy they happen to buy.

    Ask to be named as an interested party, not an additional insured. People use those two terms interchangeably but they are different. Interested party (some carriers call it additional interest) is what gets you the lapse and cancellation notice, which is the whole point of the requirement. Additional insured tries to extend your liability onto their policy and some carriers will not do it cleanly. For a single tiny house you want the notification, not the entanglement.

    Keep enforcement simple. You do not need tracking software for one unit. Two lines in the lease do the work: proof of coverage before keys are handed over, and language that a lapse is a lease default. When the carrier mails you the cancellation notice, you send a notice to cure. That is the system.

    One honest caveat from the replies above: renters insurance catches some tenant-caused damage but not all of it, and you still carry your own landlord policy on the structure. Treat the tenant policy as a first line, not a replacement for yours.

    I run MF CashFlow Property Management (M Property Group LLC) out of New Lenox, IL and require it on every lease, so happy to share the exact clause wording if it helps.

    M Property Group LLC | MF Cashflow Property Management4.995 Reviews
  • Honolulu, HI · Member since 2008 · 3k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    2mo

    Just to add to @Mike Fisher's comment about the liability portion and limits, ask YOUR insurance agent to write a "minimum" set of requirements for Tenant's to obtain, based on your LL coverage of the unit. Copy/Paste that info right into your rental agreement. They know the business best, including local specifics. 

    Also, to clarify further, the LL policy is primarily all about what you own, and your liability exposure. The Renter's policy is all about what they own (personal property), and limited liability exposure for them with regard to damages to YOUR real property, actually caused by them.

  • Aaron ZimmermanBusiness Member
    Accountant · Chicago, IL · Member since 2018 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    2mo

    I require this on my leases

  • Drew SygitBusiness Member
    Property Manager · Royal Oak, MI · Member since 2012 · 13k+ posts · 9k+ votes
    2mo
    Quote from @Kevin Turano:

    Property location = Sherman, TX.  It is a simple tiny house 1Bed,1Bath.  It has been over 6 years since I have had a NEW tenant.    I noticed that my last tenant had a renters insurance policy (without me mandating).  In 2026 is it normal to REQUIRE this from tenants?  What are Pros/Cons?  Grateful for advice!


    Most of these policies are primarily designed to protect tenant personal possessions, NOT the rental home.

    Landlord Benefit: tenant possessions insured if damaged by basement flood, leaks, etc.

    You may want to research local options to find policies that will protect you, then provide these to your tenants to use. 

    Be sure to be added as, "additionally insured".

    "Additional interest" will ONLY get you notified if coverage changes or lapses.

  • Jeffrey McKeePro Member
    Real Estate Agent · Plano, TX · Member since 2013 · 479 posts · 91 votes
    2mo

    Kevin,  I would require it. You will have to request a copy of it to verify it.  Ive never been added as named on the policy but its a good policy to implement.  It seems like extra work, but if you ever need it then it is worth it. Just requiring it will run off a lot of 'bad' tenants.  

    It's a lot like the landlord inventory and condition form. Even if you provide it to the tenant, they may not return.


    Did you get your vacancy filled? Curious what your rental rate is in Sherman for a 1 bed 1 bath. I have had a 3 bed 2.5 bath duplex in Sherman.

  • Real Estate Agent · Lansing, MI · Member since 2020 · 172 posts · 94 votes
    2mo

    @Kevin Turano

    I would have it in your lease that it's required. Actually enforcing it and checking yearly for renewed policies is another thing. 

    We had tenant last year that had to vacate a unit on short notice because of a 3-day plumbing repair under the floor. Their renter's insurance covered their entire hotel stay. We got lucky on that one. We're out of the Lansing, MI area and I'm sure it may be different for other areas. But, ever since, we've "required" it from our new tenants. 

    Just explain to them that more often than not, "Bundling" a renters policy with their other insurance probably will save them money over the year. 

    - Troy 

  • Kyle MccawBusiness Member
    Property Manager · Keller, TX · Member since 2011 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    2mo

    @Kevin Turano 

    Yes. I would absolutely require renters insurance.

    We require tenants to carry at least $100,000 in liability coverage.

    The biggest benefit to the landlord is liability protection. If the tenant causes a kitchen fire, overflowing bathtub, dog bite, or other damage, there may be an insurance policy to pursue instead of trying to collect thousands of dollars directly from the tenant.

    It also protects the tenant’s belongings and can provide temporary living expenses after a covered loss. That matters to the landlord too—otherwise, after a major incident, the tenant may look to you to solve problems their own insurance should be handling.

    For the relatively small cost to the tenant, I think requiring renters insurance is a no-brainer.

    McCaw Property Management4.4902 Reviews
Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.