What Could Make a Condo Ineligible for a DSCR Loan (or general Mortgage Financing)

What Could Make a Condo Ineligible for a DSCR Loan (or general Mortgage Financing)

Robin SimonBusiness Member
Lender · Austin, TX · Member since 2022 · 5k+ posts · 4k+ votes

Hi - wanted to share this research for anyone looking into purchasing a condo for an investment property - plenty of "pitfalls" that could make financing hard or even impossible outside of say a shady or high-price hard money or private money lender:

Chart: What Could Make a Condo Ineligible for a DSCR Loan
Risk FactorTypical Threshold for IneligibilityWhy It Matters for DSCR Lenders & Investors
Ownership BreakdownMore than 50% of units are owned or permitted to be owned by investors (rentals)While DSCR Lenders expect high investor concentration, extreme imbalances can lead to weaker upkeep standards, higher turnover, and less long-term commitment from owners, increasing project risk and reducing collateral stability.
Sales/Conveyance Status in New ProjectsFewer than 90% of units sold and legally conveyed to non-developer ownersIf a developer is struggling to sell units, they may liquidate remaining units at low prices, causing comps, including the subject unit, to drop sharply in value. High unsold inventory also raises completion and financial stability concerns.
Single-Entity OwnershipOne person, entity, or related group owns more than 20% of unitsConcentrated ownership means if that owner defaults on dues or mortgages, it could destabilize the HOA’s budget and put too much control in one party’s hands, creating financial and governance risks for all owners.
Delinquency RatesMore than 10–15% of units are 60+ days past due on HOA duesHigh delinquency rates mean fewer owners are contributing to the budget, often leading to higher dues for non-delinquent owners, reduced services, or deferred maintenance — all of which harm value and cash flow.
Annual Budget Dollar DelinquencyMore than 10% of the HOA’s total annual budget in dollar terms is delinquentEven if the percentage of delinquent units is low, a few high-dues units in arrears can heavily impact the HOA’s cash flow, forcing dues increases or deferring essential repairs.
LitigationSignificant pending litigation involving the HOALawsuits over structural, safety, or habitability issues signal potentially high repair costs and insurance complications. Minor or immaterial litigation may be acceptable but often requires a lender review and Letter of Explanation (LOE).
Commercial SpaceMore than 20–30% of the total square footage is used for commercial purposesHeavy commercial presence can shift the project’s character away from residential, reduce market demand, and introduce economic risks tied to business performance rather than housing stability.
Maintenance & RepairsAny significant deferred maintenance (generally >$2,000 in needed repairs)Major repair needs or unfunded special assessments signal current or future financial strain, potentially impacting both market value and DSCR eligibility.
HOA Master Policy DeficienciesMaster policy fails to cover 100% of replacement cost or has excessive deductibles (typically >10%), or lacks flood insurance when requiredInadequate master coverage shifts the cost of repairs or rebuilding to owners via special assessments or dues increases, directly impacting investor cash flow and property value.
HO-6 “Walls-In” Policy GapsBorrower fails to obtain required HO-6 policy when master policy excludes interior improvements; deductible exceeds 5%Without proper interior coverage, the investor could be responsible for costly repairs to unit interiors after a loss, reducing net returns.
General Liability Coverage ShortfallLess than $1M per occurrence and $2M in aggregate in general liability coverage for the project’s common areasClaims from injuries or damage in common spaces could drain HOA resources, increasing costs to all owners.
Fidelity/Crime Insurance DeficiencyLess than 3 months of total HOA dues coverage (projects >20 units)Protects against theft, fraud, or embezzlement of HOA funds. Without it, a loss could cripple the HOA’s operations and reserve funding, reducing project stability.
3Reply
562 views

Most Popular Reply

Mike GrudzienPro Member
Lender · Eugene, OR · Member since 2019 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
2w

Great analysis!  Thanks.

See this reply in the discussion

4 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Investor · Pacific Northwest · Member since 2026 · 495 posts · 283 votes
    3w

    Robin, good checklist. The one thing I’d change is the framing around “ineligible.”

    A condo isn’t simply financeable or unfinanceable as a permanent characteristic of the property.

    It’s financeable under a particular lender’s rules, with a particular loan, at a particular moment.

    That distinction matters a lot with condos.

    You can have the same unit look perfectly acceptable to one lender and fail another because of investor concentration, insurance, litigation, reserves, deferred maintenance, or some lender-specific overlay.

    So before I bought a condo, I wouldn’t just ask, “Does this project pass?”

    I’d ask:

    Who can finance this today, what specifically could make them stop financing it tomorrow, and how many alternative lenders remain if that happens?

    That last part is the investment risk.

    If your exit requires the next buyer to find one unusually flexible lender, the financing problem eventually becomes your resale problem.

    The unit can be great.

    The HOA can look fine.

    And the deal can still be fragile because the buyer pool quietly disappeared.

    That’s the piece I’d underwrite.

    • Robin SimonBusiness Member
      OP
      Lender · Austin, TX · Member since 2022 · 5k+ posts · 4k+ votes
      2w
      Quote from @Michael Eskenasy:

      Robin, good checklist. The one thing I’d change is the framing around “ineligible.”

      A condo isn’t simply financeable or unfinanceable as a permanent characteristic of the property.

      It’s financeable under a particular lender’s rules, with a particular loan, at a particular moment.

      That distinction matters a lot with condos.

      You can have the same unit look perfectly acceptable to one lender and fail another because of investor concentration, insurance, litigation, reserves, deferred maintenance, or some lender-specific overlay.

      So before I bought a condo, I wouldn’t just ask, “Does this project pass?”

      I’d ask:

      Who can finance this today, what specifically could make them stop financing it tomorrow, and how many alternative lenders remain if that happens?

      That last part is the investment risk.

      If your exit requires the next buyer to find one unusually flexible lender, the financing problem eventually becomes your resale problem.

      The unit can be great.

      The HOA can look fine.

      And the deal can still be fragile because the buyer pool quietly disappeared.

      That’s the piece I’d underwrite.


       I would argue thats implied by the post and chart - lots of those things like investor concentrations, delinquency rates, single entity ownership are by definition ever-changing, not static

  • Mike GrudzienPro Member
    Lender · Eugene, OR · Member since 2019 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    2w

    Great analysis!  Thanks.

  • Lender · Coral Gables, FL · Member since 2026 · 20 posts · 3 votes
    6h

    Good chart. Broker in Miami here, where condos are half of what crosses my desk, so I'll add the Florida-specific layer and second Michael's point that eligibility is lender-by-lender, not a property trait.

    The three things that actually kill Florida condo deals right now, in order of frequency:

    1. Reserves and structural paperwork. Since the 2022 condo safety law, buildings three stories and up that are 30+ years old need a milestone inspection and a structural integrity reserve study, and associations can no longer waive funding those reserves. Lenders now ask for both documents in the questionnaire. A building that is behind on them, or that just passed a big special assessment to catch up, gets flagged. Fannie and Freddie both keep an internal list of projects they won't touch, and a surprising number of older Miami-Dade and Broward buildings are on it.

    2. Master insurance. Rows 9 through 12 in your chart are where South Florida buildings fail most. Wind deductibles above 5%, master policies that are not at 100% replacement cost, buildings self-insuring part of the risk, or a Citizens master policy with coverage gaps. The HO-6 fix on the borrower side is easy; the master policy problem is not, and it is the association's to solve.

    3. Investor concentration and short-term rental character. Buildings that are effectively condo-hotels or majority Airbnb get treated as condotels, which knocks out agency financing entirely and narrows the DSCR pool to a handful of lenders with lower LTVs.

    What has worked for my clients: run the questionnaire and the master policy before going under contract, not during the finance contingency, and shop the project (not just the borrower) across several DSCR investors, because their condo overlays differ more than their rate sheets do. One lender's 'non-warrantable, declined' is another's 'limited review, 75% LTV.' That is the whole reason to use a broker on a condo instead of a single direct lender.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.