Denver, CO · Member since 2026 · 20 posts · 10 votes
When we've got a suite to fill, the first question is almost always "who's looking?" Call the brokers, find out which practices are in the market, work that list. That's how it's always worked, and it's not crazy — the tenants actively looking are the ones who can actually sign.
But it means the tenant you end up with is mostly a function of timing. You get whoever happened to be in the market that quarter.
The question I've gotten more interested in is the other one: what is this trade area actually short of? Not what's available and not who's looking — what kind of practice could this location support that isn't here yet.
It's a harder question, and most of us don't ask it, because the answer takes real work and the broker list is sitting right there. But the two questions produce different tenants. One gives you whoever was in the market. The other gives you a practice with a reason to be in that specific building.
For owners here leasing commercial space — do you ever start from what a market is missing, or is that a luxury when you've got vacancy to cover? Curious whether anyone's made it work without it just becoming a slower path to the same tenant.
Realtor · Willow Grove, PA · Member since 2017 · 974 posts · 641 votes
1w
I wouldn't ignore the people who are actively looking, especially if you have a vacancy sitting there. But I do like the idea of looking at what the area is missing. If you can find a tenant that fits the property and there is real demand for what they offer, that's a much stronger situation than just filling the space.
The hard part is knowing whether there is actually enough demand to support that business. That's where I'd want to do my homework before holding out for the perfect tenant.
Investor · Hatboro, PA · Member since 2016 · 2k+ posts · 850 votes
6d
This is a good point. A lot of times we’re focused on finding someone who already wants the space, but the better question is what does the market actually need?
The best opportunities usually come from understanding the area and finding ways to create value, not just filling a vacancy. Sometimes that means finding a tenant who wasn’t even looking yet because the location solves a problem for them.
It takes more work, but that’s often where the better opportunities are.
CPA, CFP®, PFS · FL · Member since 2017 · 5k+ posts · 3k+ votes
6d
Darren, I think the better question is exactly the one you’re asking: what use actually belongs in this location, not just who happens to be shopping for space this month.
The broker list is still useful because those tenants can move now, but I’d treat it as only one layer of the leasing strategy. If a suite has sat vacant for a while, I’d want to understand the surrounding demand generators, demographics, traffic patterns, nearby employers, competing uses, and which tenant categories are underrepresented before deciding who to pursue.
The other piece is making sure the “missing use” actually works economically in that specific suite. A medical practice, restaurant, daycare, or specialty service may look perfect for the trade area, but the TI package, parking, zoning, buildout, HVAC/electrical requirements, and lease term can completely change the return.
That’s where I’d compare tenants on net lease economics, not just face rent. A tenant willing to pay slightly less but requiring minimal TI, offering stronger credit, and signing a longer lease may be far more valuable than the highest-rent prospect.
From the tax/accounting side, I’d also keep tenant improvements, leasing commissions, rent concessions, and CAM reimbursements tracked separately because they can have very different treatment and materially affect the true return on the lease.
So I’d use both approaches: who is looking now, and who should be there. The best outcome is when those two overlap.
Feel free to DM me, I’d be happy to send over a few resources that might help with commercial-property underwriting, lease economics, and property-level tracking.