What actually changes once you bring in a partner or private money for the first time

What actually changes once you bring in a partner or private money for the first time

Andrew FreedBusiness Member
Investor · Worcester, MA · Member since 2020 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes

From my experience, I've used both notes and shared equity, and it really comes down to the opportunity and your own risk profile. Private money gives you more control but tends to cost more, while equity is cheaper upfront but means less control and less upside for you. Would you rather give up equity for a partner's cash, or pay a private lender's rate and keep full control?

1Reply
277 views

Most Popular Reply

Houston, TX · Member since 2025 · 29 posts · 9 votes
2d

I’m a lender, but I lend debt and equity so I can be unbiased here. So my first question is how clearly you can see the repayment. If the exit is close and well defined, I’d price the debt over that actual period and compare it with the equity you’re giving up. That being said in the longrun equity will always cost more than debt unless you're dealing with genuine loan sharks.

If the project needs time and the exit is less certain, I’d give more weight to a partner who can stay in the deal. I’d also look at who decides what happens if it runs over budget or needs to be sold. Borrowing doesn’t automatically mean full control, and equity isn’t automatically cheaper. The agreement and the way the deal performs decide that.

See this reply in the discussion

3 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Houston, TX · Member since 2025 · 29 posts · 9 votes
    2d

    I’m a lender, but I lend debt and equity so I can be unbiased here. So my first question is how clearly you can see the repayment. If the exit is close and well defined, I’d price the debt over that actual period and compare it with the equity you’re giving up. That being said in the longrun equity will always cost more than debt unless you're dealing with genuine loan sharks.

    If the project needs time and the exit is less certain, I’d give more weight to a partner who can stay in the deal. I’d also look at who decides what happens if it runs over budget or needs to be sold. Borrowing doesn’t automatically mean full control, and equity isn’t automatically cheaper. The agreement and the way the deal performs decide that.

  • Erik EstradaBusiness Member
    Lender · Member since 2022 · 6k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    1d

    You should also keep in mind the shared risk on the equity side. While private money is more expensive, they do not really share the same risk as you. If you default on their loan, they take the property and charge default interest, etc.. A partner risks losing their contributed capital and the deal/property..

    LuxePrivate Investments LLC 572 Reviews
  • Noah WrightBusiness Member
    USA, Nationwide · Member since 2024 · 172 posts · 87 votes
    9h

    Depends on how clearly you can see the exit and how much control you need. Private money is priced for a short term, so if your timeline is tight and well defined, the interest might cost less than the equity you'd give up. But if the deal stretches, that rate compounds and the equity might be cheaper in the long run. The bigger difference is control: a partner gets a vote, a lender just wants their money back. And on risk, a partner loses their capital if it fails, a private lender can take the property and come after you. Most investors I know use private money for flips or short holds, and partners for longer holds or when they need a skill set they don't have. What's your exit look like?

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.