Bought a $1.47M DC fourplex with $3,500 Section 8 rents. Now market rents are ~$2,000

Bought a $1.47M DC fourplex with $3,500 Section 8 rents. Now market rents are ~$2,000

Investor · Member since 2025 · 4 posts · 0 votes

Hey everyone,

Looking for some advice from people who have been investing in multifamily properties longer than I have.

I bought a fourplex in Washington, DC, in April 2026 for approximately $1.47M. Each apartment is a 3BR/1BA, around 790 square feet. I’m currently living in one unit and trying to rent the other three.

When I purchased the building, the existing Section 8 rents were around $3,500/month. I knew those rents were higher than market, but I don’t think I fully appreciated how much that would impact the economics once the tenants moved out.

Now I’m finding that realistic market rents are probably closer to $2,000–$2,200/month, honestly probably closer to $2,000.

To complicate things further, DC is changing how it calculates voucher rents, so my understanding is that even if I find new Section 8 tenants, the rents I’d receive would be substantially lower than what the previous tenants were paying. Basically, I don’t think I can realistically reproduce the original rental income.

My PITI is approximately $10,000/month, and the three vacant apartments have been on the market for around 100 days.

I’m a physician with a high W-2 income, so I can afford to carry the building. But being able to afford something doesn’t mean it’s a good investment.

Here’s the potential upside:

There’s an unfinished basement that’s currently generating no income. I’m considering converting it into two additional 1BR/1BA apartments, assuming zoning and permitting allow it.

Preliminary numbers:

  • Construction: $150K–$250K

  • Potential additional rent: $2,800–$3,600/month combined

  • Financing: Potentially around 6%

  • Total units afterward: 6

I’d also consider renovating the existing apartments as tenants turn over, potentially adding second bathrooms and upgrading kitchens and finishes to increase rents.

But that means investing even more money into a property that already isn’t performing the way I originally anticipated.

My biggest concern is cash flow and scalability.

I understand appreciation and mortgage paydown can create substantial long-term wealth. But if I’m subsidizing this building by several thousand dollars every month, that’s money I can’t use to acquire additional properties.

And if the original rents are no longer achievable, I’m also wondering how much less the building might be worth today than what I paid.

So I’m debating whether to stabilize and hold for 15–20 years, develop the basement and try to improve the economics, or sell and redeploy the capital into a better-performing investment.

I’m not particularly emotionally attached to the property. I want to build a real estate portfolio, and I’m trying to figure out whether this building is a good foundation for that or whether I’m just throwing good money after bad.

For those of you who have been in a similar situation, what would you do? Would you accept the negative cash flow for the long-term equity upside, invest more to add units, or cut your losses and move on?

Especially interested in perspectives from people familiar with DC multifamily, Section 8 rent changes, and value-add projects.

Thanks in advance.

2 votes total

Hold and ride it out
Renovate / add units
Rent it out, then sell
Cut losses and sell now
Other (comment below)
0Reply
389 views

Most Popular Reply

Real Estate Agent · Dallas · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 37 votes
14h

@Nathan Froelich I think you’re asking the right question: not whether you can afford to carry the property, but whether the capital tied up in it is working efficiently.

I’d be careful about putting another 150–$250K into the basement until youve established that the conversion is legally and financially viable. Beyond zoning and permits, you'd want to understand the costs of bringing the units up to code, including separate utilities, fire safety, egress, and any additional insurance or property taxes. I’d also run the numbers using today’s realistic market rents rather than the previous Section 8 income.

Calculate the building’s potential net operating income after vacancy, maintenance, management, taxes, insurance, and reserves. Then compare that with your actual debt service and the additional financing required for the conversion.

One thing I’d pay particular attention to is whether the two new units would genuinely improve the property’s overall return after accounting for construction costs and financing. Additional rental income is attractive, but gross rent alone doesn’t tell you whether the investment makes sense.

Ultimately, I'd compare three scenarios: holding the property as it stands, completing the basement conversion, and selling to redeploy the equity elsewhere. For the sale option, I’d compare your realistic net proceeds with the returns you could reasonably expect from another investment.

Your high W-2 income gives you flexibility, but I wouldn’t let that become a reason to keep funding a property that isn’t meeting your investment objectives. Sometimes the best decision is to improve an asset, and sometimes it’s to recognize that the capital could be put to better use elsewhere.

See this reply in the discussion

15 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Real Estate Agent · Dallas · Member since 2026 · 50 posts · 37 votes
    14h

    @Nathan Froelich I think you’re asking the right question: not whether you can afford to carry the property, but whether the capital tied up in it is working efficiently.

    I’d be careful about putting another 150–$250K into the basement until youve established that the conversion is legally and financially viable. Beyond zoning and permits, you'd want to understand the costs of bringing the units up to code, including separate utilities, fire safety, egress, and any additional insurance or property taxes. I’d also run the numbers using today’s realistic market rents rather than the previous Section 8 income.

    Calculate the building’s potential net operating income after vacancy, maintenance, management, taxes, insurance, and reserves. Then compare that with your actual debt service and the additional financing required for the conversion.

    One thing I’d pay particular attention to is whether the two new units would genuinely improve the property’s overall return after accounting for construction costs and financing. Additional rental income is attractive, but gross rent alone doesn’t tell you whether the investment makes sense.

    Ultimately, I'd compare three scenarios: holding the property as it stands, completing the basement conversion, and selling to redeploy the equity elsewhere. For the sale option, I’d compare your realistic net proceeds with the returns you could reasonably expect from another investment.

    Your high W-2 income gives you flexibility, but I wouldn’t let that become a reason to keep funding a property that isn’t meeting your investment objectives. Sometimes the best decision is to improve an asset, and sometimes it’s to recognize that the capital could be put to better use elsewhere.

  • Jay HinrichsBusiness Member
    Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
    11h

    @Russell Brazil I would talk to Russ he is the DC expert on this panel full stop.

    • Investor · Member since 2025 · 4 posts · 0 votes
      6h

      Thank you! I look forward to hopefully hearing from him.

    • Russell BrazilBusiness Member
      Moderator
      Real Estate Agent · Washington, D.C. · Member since 2012 · 17k+ posts · 30k+ votes
      5h

      Thanks for the tag @Jay Hinrichs . @Nathan Froelich I did take the liberty of looking up your property. Im very familiar with Kingman Park and have owned section 8 rentals in the neighborhood before, specifically because of how high those rents were there.

      I doubt you could get approval for 6 units here currently. Not impossible, but improbable. The neighborhoods general zoning allows 2 units on the lots.

      If this was 2020, Id probably have said this was a worthwhile purchase. However today, Id have been leery of it at this price. Prices are declining in the eastern half of the city, and multifamily has been the worst performing asset type over the last 2 years here. At this price point, I just closed a 4 unit property in Mount Pleasant.....much higher rents and a part of the city where prices are not declining.

      What you do have going for you is the future stadium. However, a lot of that pricing may already be baked into the prices here, as they have been a little more resilient than the neighborhoods just north of here.

      So whats the solution here? I dont know to be honest. Youre just 6 months into owning this, so turning around and selling would cause a loss. Section 8 rent schedules are in flux, and rents here havnt been that strong with those changes.

    • Member since 2025 · 2 posts · 0 votes
      4h

      I appreciate your feedback, thank you!

  • Realtor · Memphis, Shelby County · Member since 2026 · 248 posts · 85 votes
    7h

    You're asking the right question, and you've already spotted the key lesson: the building was priced on inflated, non-replicable rents instead of market rents. Sunk cost is sunk cost — run every decision off today's numbers, not what you paid in April.

    Underwrite strictly on the $2,000–$2,200/unit market rent, with realistic vacancy, maintenance, management, and reserves. Then pressure-test the basement math before committing: get real contractor bids, confirm zoning and permits with the city, and model the vacancy you'll carry during construction.

    Since you can comfortably carry the building, time is genuinely on your side. Renovating units at natural turnover to earn stronger rents is often the steadier path than forcing value with more capital. And a fresh rent survey from a local investor-friendly agent or appraiser will ground all of this in real comps rather than projections.

  • Real Estate Agent · Chicago, IL · Member since 2017 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    7h

    Interesting there is such a large spread from market to sec 8. Is this forsure accurate? Have you tried marketing the units at for example $2500 or $2750 with a good realtor and professional photos to see if can get higher?

    Not sure about DC market but here in Chicago prices are up yoy and anyone who bought in last 3 years can still sell for a nice profit. Possibly look at flipping it off in spring. Another option is pay down the loan a bit so you are not cashflow negative. These buildings assuming its a nice area tend to compound and look great after a few years if are able to hold on.

    • Investor · Member since 2025 · 4 posts · 0 votes
      6h

      Yeah, I had documents at rent from that amount. But they changed how they are compensating and now they do not pay that much.

      Right now they are listed for about 2200 per month and not having significant interest

      It is professionally managed with good photos from a photographer. 

  • Dan BeaulieuPro Member
    Lender · Knoxville, Tennessee (TN) · Member since 2016 · 426 posts · 671 votes
    7h

    Okay, so you're not throwing good money after bad yet. But you're close to the edge, and the basement is where that could happen.

    Let's run it at the rents you actually think you'll get, not the old Section 8 number.

    Four units at $2,000 is $8,000 a month once you eventually move out. Knock off 20% for vacancy, repairs, capex and turnover (conservative, but older buildings aren't cheap to keep up) and you're at about $6,400. Against $10,000 PITI that's roughly $3,600 a month negative, or about $43K a year. While you live there it looks worse on paper, but you'd be paying rent somewhere anyway so I'd judge it on the stabilized number.

    Here's the lender way to look at it. Rent divided by the payment is $8,000 over $10,000, a 0.80 DSCR. Most DSCR lenders want 1.0 minimum and like 1.20 or better. So at today's rents the building doesn't support its own debt... and that's the exact thing an investor buyer is gonna notice when you go to sell.

    Break even is about $2,900 a unit after that 20% haircut. You said yourself $2,000 is realistic. That gap is the whole problem.

    Now the basement. Say it comes in at the top of your range, $250K (it always does, budget for overruns). At 6% on a 30 year that's about $1,500 a month P&I. Two units at the low end, $2,800, minus the same 20% is $2,240. So you net maybe $700 a month before your property taxes go up. That's real money, and if you paid cash it's roughly a 10% return, not too shabby. But it shrinks a $3,600 hole to about $2,900. It doesn't fix the building. And I'd want zoning, egress, ceiling height and permits nailed down in writing before spending a dime on drawings.

    So the honest question is the one you already asked. To justify losing $43K a year you need around 3% a year appreciation on $1.47M just to stay even (principal paydown helps some, I'm ignoring it). If you believe DC does that for the next decade, holding is defensible. If not, selling and eating the transaction costs (call it 6 to 7%, so $90K to $100K, plus whatever the value dropped) might still beat bleeding for years.

    What I'd do first, before any of that: get the three units leased. 100 days vacant usually means price, not market. Drop to $1,950 and fill them, because zero rent is way worse than $2,000 rent. Then you're making the hold or sell call with real numbers instead of guesses.

    I'm a lender, fwiw, and I see this alot on buildings bought on someone else's rent roll. Curious what you're listing the vacant units at right now.

    • Investor · Member since 2025 · 4 posts · 0 votes
      6h

      Right now, the units are listed at 2295.

      Plan was to put in unit washer/dryer, which will cost about $28,000 to do for the entire building, and then either hold at that price for a week to see how that impacts desirability and if not, drop it to $2000 per month per unit and get it rented at that rate

  • Divin KanyamaBusiness Member
    Accountant · Seattle, WA · Member since 2025 · 640 posts · 268 votes
    6h

    @Nathan Froelich Not a DC expert, but I’ve worked with Section 8 a fair bit, so here’s my take. Good on you for asking the hard question instead of defending the purchase.

    First, I'd figure out what the building is worth today. Buyers will price it off achievable rents, not the old $3,500 voucher rents. At about $2,000 a unit, you're bringing in roughly $6,000 against $10,000 in PITI. That's a $4,000+ monthly hole before repairs and vacancy.

    I also wouldn’t count on Section 8 to fill that gap. With payment standards dropping, I’d underwrite at market and treat vouchers as a bonus for steady payments.

    The basement is the interesting part. $200K at 6% is about $1,000 a month in interest against $2,800 to $3,600 in new rent, which looks good on paper. But check zoning, egress, ceiling height, and permits first, get a firm bid, and add a 20% cushion for overruns.

    If the basement checks out, I’d add the units. If not, I’d sell and put the equity into something that cash flows. A building that costs you $4,000 a month is eating your next down payment. Talk to a CPA before you sell, since you live there. My vote is “Renovate / add units,” but only after the zoning and valuation checks.

  • Lender · Milwaukee, WI · Member since 2026 · 6 posts · 0 votes
    5h

    @Nathan Froelich Dan's DSCR math is right. One point nobody has raised that should shape the basement decision: going from four units to six moves you out of residential lending and valuation.

    As a fourplex, the building is appraised mainly on sales comps of other 2–4 unit buildings, which is why the value hit may be smaller than you fear. Residential appraisers don't price it straight off the rent roll.

    At five or more units it's commercial multifamily. Value comes from the income approach (NOI divided by a market cap rate), and permanent lenders typically want 1.20–1.25x DSCR, 25–30% equity, 5–10 year terms on a 25–30 year amortization, often with a prepayment penalty. At $2,000 rents, a six-unit building could appraise below what you'll have in it, which makes refinancing out of the construction money hard.

    Before spending on drawings:

    • Ask your servicer whether your current note allows a second lien or major alterations. Funding the build with a HELOC or second while it's still a 1–4 unit owner-occupied property is usually cheapest, but the next permanent loan will be commercial.

    • Get an as-completed six-unit value at market rents from a local commercial appraiser.

    • Confirm with a DC attorney whether adding units affects the small-owner exemption from DC rent stabilization.

    If the as-completed value doesn't clear your total basis, the basement isn't your exit.

  • Josh C.Pro Member
    Property Manager · Indianapolis, IN · Member since 2010 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    5h

    🤯 over 350k per unit? That’s what class A new construction costs in lots of markets. If you can afford it, take your medicine, and buy something with at least double rent to cost ratio.
    In Indianapolis you could buy almost brand new class A for less than 200k per unit with the same rents.
    Good luck, but I’d leave DC to the politicians unless that’s you are going to be pretty involved.
    15-20 year stabilization plan is silly even if you can afford it. Once you account for your opportunity cost it’s a no brainer. Sunk cost basis is not your friend.

  • Realtor · Columbus, Franklin County · Member since 2026 · 67 posts · 16 votes
    4h

    Sorry that's the situation, Nathan. Two thoughts from the underwriting side (I come from an affordable housing background). 1) Re-underwrite the building at the rent you can actually sign today, not at the old rent roll. With the units listed above where the market is clearing, each month a unit sits empty costs about a full month's rent plus carry, so that usually outweighs a week of testing a higher price. Pick a decision date (say 14 days with no applications) and reprice then. 2) Run the washer/dryer math before spending the $28k: $28,000 across three units is about $9,300 per unit. To earn even a 15% return, each unit needs to rent roughly $115/month higher because of it. If comparable units without in-unit laundry are renting for $2,000-2,200, I'd test price first and keep the cash for reserves. If any prospective tenant uses a voucher, note that the payment standard and a rent-reasonableness check cap what the housing authority will approve, so the old $3,500 contract rent won't be your guide. Feel free to DM me if you want to compare notes.

  • Real Estate Agent · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2018 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    1h

    A couple of thoughts:

    • Can you deploy the cash to buy a small rental in a different market to make up the difference?

    • Does it change the financing options now that you would be 5+ units and above? Are the rates better if you do it? That way you get more units rented and you have a better mortgage.

    • What does the long term horizon look like in DC? Getting more complicated? Seeing potential for mass appreciation?

    • Keep in mind we are in cycles. Right now there is a lot of inventory and few tenants are moving. Think long term rather than reacting to what's happening today.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.