18 February 2026 | 0 replies
And yet, a few months in, costs creep up, timelines stretch, communication gets messy, and stress replaces confidence.
4 February 2026 | 56 replies
Now to be fair the company we are funding is a Civil engineering firm with deep experience..
19 February 2026 | 4 replies
ARV Doesn’t Matter Until the Rehab Is RealisticToo many investors reverse-engineer their deal:ARV × 75 percent = “My max offer.”Then they plug in a rehab number that magically makes the deal look good.The problem?
19 February 2026 | 12 replies
I would need to check the books and then propose a price.I get the “AI will replace bookkeepers/accountants” argument, but I think it misses the core reality of what accounting actually is in practice: It is constantly a gray and depends on context that rarely lives inside the transaction itself.A bank feed line item is just a line item.
19 February 2026 | 8 replies
No industry, no engine for growth.My advice is to look at urban cores like Sacramento and invest where the action is.
15 February 2026 | 10 replies
My advice seeing what she's going through is to get a structural engineer.
6 February 2026 | 14 replies
I came to that conclusion for my own portfolio and had Cost-segregation guys do the engineered study.
3 February 2026 | 5 replies
I'd encourage you to check out ours :) There's also a link to my pricing engine at my website link below in my signature.
7 February 2026 | 6 replies
The big risk items are setbacks zoning coverage and any structural work or foundation work that was done without engineering.
3 February 2026 | 11 replies
The engineered study matters because it's your IRS defense for those numbers.