Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

42
Posts
60
Votes
Wendy Stclair
  • Investor
  • Long Beach, CA
60
Votes |
42
Posts

Cost Segregation? Worth it?

Wendy Stclair
  • Investor
  • Long Beach, CA
Posted

I've been hearing the hype about Cost Segregation for a while and I wasn't sure i was a candidate. Still not. My w2 income wont be over $100k for 2022, I will hopefully be considered a RE professional and i had 5 properties, some already in the red due to rennovations.  But a provider did a prelim estimate for me and it says that for my 5 properties i'd have increased depreciation of $177k and estimated tax savings in year 1 of $68k.  Its just an "estimate" but i'm sure i'm supposed be wooed by it.  Do these "free estimates" usually come out close to the truth and if so, do those numbers make sense for someone in my situation? I heard you could carry the the depreciation forward if you don't use it all but i'm not clear the dollar for dollar value.  Are they saying i truly pay $68k less over time if i simply give them $18k today? what if my income is lower in future years? What do I need to consider that i'm not? Any advise is welcome! Thanks 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

48
Posts
80
Votes
Chelsea Monk
  • Accountant
  • San Angelo, TX
80
Votes |
48
Posts
Chelsea Monk
  • Accountant
  • San Angelo, TX
Replied

They're coming up with a ~38% tax bracket. Given that CA doesn't conform to federal bonus depreciation rules, you'd be looking at a max tax bracket of 24% fed and 9.3% state, so already their estimate is high. Then consider that you're not a RE professional (unless your work in RE accounts for more than 50% of your money-making time AND is more than 750 hours), and your losses are limited to $25k max, less if the rest of your income is over $100k. So max savings in a single tax year would be ~$8500, bearing in mind that you'd be offsetting any rental profits with the losses generated by the cost seg study, so potentially just a smidge higher on the federal side. And also bear in mind that the state savings may actually be less since you'll have to depreciate all class lives over their actual life and not up front.

Does it make sense for you? Maybe. I've recommended similar. But you'd need to sit down with your accountant and run projections to see the pros and cons, including what you expect income to look like in future years and your plans for your properties.

  • Chelsea Monk
  • [email protected]
  • 224-381-2660
  • Loading replies...