Because I think they are either misinterpreted intentionally or unintentionally. https://youtu.be/FbiVenRL5JQ?

Statement Regarding Previous Forum PostDear Legal and Legislation Community,I am writing to clarify and correct any potential misrepresentations from my previous post dated [date of original post] regarding the real estate syndication deal I invested in, managed by Simple Passive Cashflow and Truepoint Capital, with Lane Kawaoka and Kyle Jones as General Partners.My initial post may have unintentionally conveyed inaccuracies or negative implications about the General Partners and the overall management of the deal.

That’s when it hit me—we were unintentionally excluding people who wanted to learn and contribute.

As a developer, one of my main pet peeves when working with wholesalers in the past was being misled on numbers—albeit perhaps unintentionally—simply because they didn't have a solid grasp on how much it genuinely costs to rehab a property.On another note, regarding getting your real estate license: I'd suggest perhaps not jumping into that immediately.

Hey @Christopher Burgos Thanks for the unintentional dinner inspiration...I was trying to figure it out, and you nailed it!

Though unintentional, this result can be misleading.

It could unintentionally discourage good tenants or push them toward not disclosing pets at all.If your goal is to cover risk, I’d recommend leaning on the one-time fee and doing annual inspections.

David Greene unintentionally got a lot of people in trouble, his book is making it sound too easy and totally ignores the human element of contractors, PMs and tenants. 

Let’s call a duck a duck.Ironically/unintentionally, they have/are injecting resources in these low-income neighborhoods.

Sticking to your approval criteria and treating everyone the same thwarts that from happening even unintentionally.