Also, with eggshell, we can wash the walls and remove most marks without painting.

This can materially alter opex compared to a multi-family building that requires snow removal, common area cleaning & utilities, pest service and other misc. opex items that may not apply to SFH'sThen there's the reliance on self-reported data from individual investors, many of whom self-perform work, defer maintenance, or ignore routine capex items that prudent real estate operators treat as ordinary annual expenses.

Both tenants will be notified upon closing that their leases will not be renewed, but we fully expect a majority of the items to be left behind.For those of you that have encountered this before, how did you handle removal of the items?

We are looking for the egregious outliers that give our industry a bad name.I want to clarify what HawkAudit actually does, because I think there's a misunderstanding:We're NOT:- Questioning every line item- Using "AI estimates" to lowball contractors- Encouraging clients to nickel-and-dime on legitimate costs- Telling contractors what they should chargeWe ARE:- Identifying duplicate charges (like being billed twice for the same attic debris removal)- Flagging vague line items that could lead to scope disputes later ("touch-up entire unit" - what does that mean?)

If anyone has previously completed this online form via Philadelphia's Tax Center, and would be willing to share a sample form or screenshots (obviously with all personal identifiable information removed), I'd really appreciate it. 

Here’s what’s changing Eviction courts will ONLY decide who gets possession No more tenant counterclaims slowing things down Faster timelines for service, hearings, appeals & writs Quicker removal of squatters & unauthorized occupants Notices can be mailed, posted, handed to occupants (16+), or sent electronically (if agreed) Tenants MUST pay rent during appeals—or the appeal is dismissed Statewide uniform rules (no extra local court hoops) Translation: Fewer delays.

He should expect to be ordered to remove the improvements at his expense.Unjust enrichment is used when there is NOT a contract... but under circumstances where it would be inequitable for the defendant to keep the benefits received from the plaintiff without compensation/restitution.

Option 2.1 - not sure size of yard but typically back yards are minimal and you can remove grass and add in combo of patio and small strip of turf.

FDICIn the context of real estate and promissory notes, stress-testing is best viewed as a risk awareness tool:It doesn’t remove risk, but it helps identify what could go wrongIt helps quantify how sensitive the deal is to changes in key assumptionsIt informs whether there are adequate buffers (reserves, conservative pricing, clear legal position) if stress scenarios occurThis perspective is consistent with commonly published guidance on note investing and risk management, which emphasizes both default risk and market fluctuations as primary areas of concern for potential investors. guideforinvestment.com

I will not trust the tenant to manage the risks prudently and will instead utilize a modified gross lease where I will retain control over physical work orders, snow removal and items that I view as greater liability occurrence related activities.