9 February 2026 | 516 replies
Regarding BC/AC, Oakbrook, unlike your property, and other properties fit that description.
2 January 2026 | 2 replies
I didn't necessarily need to build my own, and I probably could've dived a bit deeper into current products to find the right fit, but I doubt I'd find what would work best for me.
30 December 2025 | 12 replies
Quote from @Patrick Roberts: This property wont fit the securitization model, so whomever lends on it will have to hold the paper.
12 February 2026 | 2064 replies
@Michael Plante It's certainly not a one-size fits all strategy/structure.
9 January 2026 | 38 replies
We are currently acquiring small new build multifamily BTR projects that fit perfectly with a long term net worth growth mindset.
30 December 2025 | 2 replies
Deals that fit my operating style, capital structure, and tolerance for uncertainty tend to perform better over time, even if the projected returns look more conservative.At this point, passing on a deal that technically works feels like risk management, not missed opportunity.
5 January 2026 | 10 replies
Without accountability, real estate investing is likely not a good fit.
2 January 2026 | 7 replies
If a deal only works on paper, it won’t work in real life.To build a strong network, focus on understanding each investor’s buy box (area, price range, rehab level) and only send deals that truly fit.
8 January 2026 | 9 replies
Be very clear about:The campuses you’re targetingYour ideal property type (SFH vs duplex, bed/bath count)Your plan to rent by the roomThat clarity helps them filter noise and surface opportunities that actually fit your strategy.Off-market deals can absolutely work in student housing, but they require consistency and a system.