Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Real Estate Technology
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

13
Posts
4
Votes
Puja Varude
4
Votes |
13
Posts

The PadSplit 'Management Fee' is a Scam

Puja Varude
Posted

​"Warning to all co-living investors: PadSplit’s model is high-risk with zero protection. I am currently deplatforming after my property was ruined by members who smoked inside and caused thousands in damage. PadSplit’s legal stance is that they don't guarantee payouts for damages, even if they collected fees to manage that member. If you want to keep your property value and your sanity, look for a local management company that actually stands by their vetting process."

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,886
Posts
2,819
Votes
Stuart Udis
#3 General Real Estate Investing Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Philadelphia
2,819
Votes |
1,886
Posts
Stuart Udis
#3 General Real Estate Investing Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Philadelphia
Replied

@Puja Varude Are we really just discovering now that leasing a house to a company whose entire business model is subleasing individual bedrooms might come with additional wear and tear?

This is a bit like renting a house to a fraternity and then being shocked when the neighbors start calling about noise. Do you genuinely think this type of arrangement is designed to attract responsible, high-character, quality tenants?

None of this is surprising, unusual, or even particularly unfair. It is the predictable outcome of a use you likely selected because you wanted higher returns than renting the home to a single household. Risk and reward travel together. The only real surprise would have been if the property came back pristine.

  • Stuart Udis
  • [email protected]
  • Loading replies...