Quote from @Aaron Breckenridge: @Jacob Atkins sorry about that, it should be working now. 

So this is why this is challenging, typically in these instances when you're also the operator, typically you may get 10 to 20% of the profit after giving a preferred return to the investorthis is why you are better off getting a loan and getting 80-90% financing and they include 100% renovation costs 

For instance if your credit limit is $1,000 do not have more than a $300 balance.

I have had numerous instances where I sent a deal to them, structured it for the client and then the client circumvented me on their retail channel.

A payment schedule would not have helped for this instance, but I could have asked to pay the materials distributor directly - which is what I did when I resumed the job with another connector.  

This means going beyond the office and sharing meals together.I remember one instance where we closed a significant deal, we made the effort to understand the broker's interests.

Here are some of the chargesBuying foreclosuresFalse & Misleading StatementsUsing Invalid ContractsExploitation of Vulnerable AdultsBankruptcy FraudProbate Court FraudTitle FraudUnlawful EvictionViolation of Consumer Fraud ActViolation of Consumer Fraud Act RecruitingViolation of Consumer Fraud Act OmissionsViolation of Consumer Fraud Void ContractsViolation of Consumer Fraud Foreclosure ConsultantsViolation of Consumer Fraud Unauthorized Practice of LawRacketeering - Scheme or Artifice to DefraudRacketeering - ForgeryRacketeering – Illegally Conducting an EnterpriseAlter EgoLis PendensAll parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law I am sure if you searched some of my prior posts I have been warning people about approaching people in foreclosure claiming to "help them" by taking advantage of them, even if you were trying to do the right thing, it does not matter in many instances as you may be perceived of taking advantage of someone in distress.I would also bet a very large sum of money we are going to see more of this occur just like we did ten years ago with CFD's getting into legal hot water, especailly as market softens and foreclosures start to ramp back up.Here is link to a summary of article:Attorney General Mayes Sues Real Estate Operators and Title Companies for Defrauding Arizona Homeowners | Arizona Attorney GeneralSubTo, Subject To, Foreclosure Yep.

For instance, if there was a total of $250K of debt on those properties that woud leave you with $350K of proceeds to use to purchase $600K of real estate.  

This is why lenders typically like to see borrower's equity contribution allocated to the project first and the lender then covers the rest of improvements and in some instances soft/carrying costs.  

As a former employee of Kristin Witherspoon, I was subjected to repeated instances of non-payment, which is a clear violation of basic employment principles.