Hello Everyone,
I am a newbie in RE and need your expert opinion. I live in the San Francisco Bay Area, have a solid W2 job and a high credit score, and want to invest in SFH or a duplex in San Antonio or Raleigh (ok with neighboring cities). I have done a lot of research and narrowed it down to these two cities (I know someone from Michigan, Ohio, or Indiana would comment on investing in those states., but please don't..I am only interested in TX or NC). I like Texas, but the only thing that holds me back is the higher property taxes compared to North Carolina.
1- Money: ok to spend 200-300K (prefer to put only 20-30% down) and invest in a couple of properties than buying one in cash
2- Prefer cash flow (of course, appreciation would also be great)
3-Prefer SFH over duplex just because with SFH (in a good neighborhood), I probably would have less headache and drama
Here are my questions:
1- Which city do you invest in and why?
2- Would you consider any other city in NC or TX? Why?
2-Am I correct in thinking SFH has less headache over multi? if not, why not?
3- How would you spend the 300k for investment?
Thanks,
MJ
I'm not familiar with the San Antonio market, can only speak to the Raleigh/Triangle area market but here's my take:
1) I'm currently invested in Raleigh, Cary, Smithfield, Selma, and Lake Lure NC
2) I would consider other cities in NC, but not in TX just due to proximity.
2) SFH vs multi... there are a lot of factors, so depends on how you define "less headache". Speaking in generalizations as it really depends on the deal, but SFHs won't have as much cash flow as a multi typically. You may have more options on the back end as far as resale, though, because you can sell it to an owner occupant OR investor. As far as a multi, personally if all things were equal I'd go for the multi for a few reasons. 1) Added diversification.. if one tenant doesn't pay, you can still cover property expenses with the other tenants 2) Shared capex... typically, one roof and one property to maintain but multiple streams of income 3) Less vacancy.. usually multi's rent for lower, for example one of mine is the sweet spot of 3 bedrooms for $1300. These are usually easier to fill because it's perceived as "better value" versus a 3 bed SFH that is renting for $1800-$2000. There are going to be more people who can afford $1300 so vacancy is less of an issue.
3) This is a broad question, and it really depends on so many factors. As a newbie, I would probably start with one property, and see how that goes.
Hello, I am local in the Raleigh market so I would be biased to say to invest in Raleigh. I am a license GC and Realtor and can help you located some properties to analyze. I will send you a DM.
@MJ Jav i m exactly in the same boat as you are. I started looking at Raleigh and surrounding Clayton, zebulon area. Right now its very difficult to even breakeven with 100k down on a 330-350k decent size sfh. I feel someone has to put more down to become cash flow positive. Not sure if this growth of Raleigh triangle area will stay as it is or we will see a slow down and 5-10% correction this year.
Raleigh's real estate market is characterized by its resilience, growth potential, and appeal to a wide range of tenants. These factors make it an attractive option for your investment criteria, balancing cash flow and appreciation prospects in a stable economic environment.
I'm not familiar with the San Antonio market, can only speak to the Raleigh/Triangle area market but here's my take:
1) I'm currently invested in Raleigh, Cary, Smithfield, Selma, and Lake Lure NC
2) I would consider other cities in NC, but not in TX just due to proximity.
2) SFH vs multi... there are a lot of factors, so depends on how you define "less headache". Speaking in generalizations as it really depends on the deal, but SFHs won't have as much cash flow as a multi typically. You may have more options on the back end as far as resale, though, because you can sell it to an owner occupant OR investor. As far as a multi, personally if all things were equal I'd go for the multi for a few reasons. 1) Added diversification.. if one tenant doesn't pay, you can still cover property expenses with the other tenants 2) Shared capex... typically, one roof and one property to maintain but multiple streams of income 3) Less vacancy.. usually multi's rent for lower, for example one of mine is the sweet spot of 3 bedrooms for $1300. These are usually easier to fill because it's perceived as "better value" versus a 3 bed SFH that is renting for $1800-$2000. There are going to be more people who can afford $1300 so vacancy is less of an issue.
3) This is a broad question, and it really depends on so many factors. As a newbie, I would probably start with one property, and see how that goes.
I recently bought my first rental property in Durham, NC ( which is a suburb of Raleigh North Carolina) . Here, it is difficult to meet the one percent rule Suggested in bigger pockets. Most of the properties go for about half a percentage. So you would probably end up having negative cash flow in most of the deals. The deal that I invested in was a $330k townhome 3 bedroom 3 bath. That is renting for 2k dollars. I put in 25% down. After taxes, hoa, mortgage, insurance, I end up with slightly negative cashflow. I am using a property manager and that costs 8% and I use 5% of rent as reapir reserve - this takes me deep in the red. My hope is appreciation in durham (rent and home prices).
I think @Ananth NA is right on point. A SFH can generate cash flow but is really more of an appreciation play compared to a MF property. The value of the MF will be determined mostly by the cash flow it brings in. If cash flow appreciates so will the property value. The SFH, however, will appreciate with or without cash flow.
I also agree with the observation about the 1% rule. In the Raleigh-Durham area 0.5% is the prevailing measure. Mostly, this is because of the growth in the area. While some deals may be negative cash in the early years, the area growth will push up both rents and home prices tuning the deal positive within a couple of years.
In your stated price range (200K - 300K) you are likely to find some SFH and some TH but mostly condos (which are totally a cashflow play as they appreciate last). For my first-time investors, I recommend going the townhouse route because they are very rentable, less per door than SFH, appreciate well and much of the exterior maintenance is handled by the HOA.
Happy to chat and answer any questions you have about the area. Just reach out through BP.
I live in Raleigh and have a close friend who is an active investor in San Antonio, TX. The purchase price of SFH seem to be a lot lower in San Antonion than they are in the Triangle area. I think it would be worth exploring that market as your money likely can go further. The Triangle is a great area bu tin high demand with a lot of people relocating here so you'll have a lot of competition with home owners and investors alike. Just another perspective :)
I live in Raleigh and have a close friend who is an active investor in San Antonio, TX. The purchase price of SFH seem to be a lot lower in San Antonion than they are in the Triangle area. I think it would be worth exploring that market as your money likely can go further. The Triangle is a great area bu tin high demand with a lot of people relocating here so you'll have a lot of competition with home owners and investors alike. Just another perspective :)
Alyson you are absolutely correct and I agree with you :)
@MJ Jav i m exactly in the same boat as you are. I started looking at Raleigh and surrounding Clayton, zebulon area. Right now its very difficult to even breakeven with 100k down on a 330-350k decent size sfh. I feel someone has to put more down to become cash flow positive. Not sure if this growth of Raleigh triangle area will stay as it is or we will see a slow down and 5-10% correction this year.
Have you found a home yet?
Raleigh's real estate market is characterized by its resilience, growth potential, and appeal to a wide range of tenants. These factors make it an attractive option for your investment criteria, balancing cash flow and appreciation prospects in a stable economic environment.
Thank you this is very helpful
I think @Ananth NA is right on point. A SFH can generate cash flow but is really more of an appreciation play compared to a MF property. The value of the MF will be determined mostly by the cash flow it brings in. If cash flow appreciates so will the property value. The SFH, however, will appreciate with or without cash flow.
I also agree with the observation about the 1% rule. In the Raleigh-Durham area 0.5% is the prevailing measure. Mostly, this is because of the growth in the area. While some deals may be negative cash in the early years, the area growth will push up both rents and home prices tuning the deal positive within a couple of years.
In your stated price range (200K - 300K) you are likely to find some SFH and some TH but mostly condos (which are totally a cashflow play as they appreciate last). For my first-time investors, I recommend going the townhouse route because they are very rentable, less per door than SFH, appreciate well and much of the exterior maintenance is handled by the HOA.
Happy to chat and answer any questions you have about the area. Just reach out through BP.
I will definitely look into TH..Thanks!
I live in Raleigh and have a close friend who is an active investor in San Antonio, TX. The purchase price of SFH seem to be a lot lower in San Antonion than they are in the Triangle area. I think it would be worth exploring that market as your money likely can go further. The Triangle is a great area bu tin high demand with a lot of people relocating here so you'll have a lot of competition with home owners and investors alike. Just another perspectiThank
Thanks for sharing..I agree seems like there is more competition in Raleigh than in San Antonio
I've lived in both texas and north carolina. Agent in both states too. More than happy to discuss differences, shoot a PM